Your company wants to implement a Virtual Private Network for employees that work remotely. Research remote virtual computing software products not covered in the textbook readings for this topic. Then, provide a 750- to 1,000-word report to the company’s CIO that includes the following:
- Compare the top VPN products on the market.
- Find out how the security features of VPN products may benefit the organization.
- Provide three suggestions for VPN products for the company. Explain your ideal choice for the corporation.
Note: You must use at least one credible reference.
While GCU style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using GCU formatting guidelines, which can be found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
My company I have chose to do my projects for is: Canyon Aeronautics
Link to my company’s website:
https://lc.gcumedia.com/itt115/company-website-profiles/v2.1/canyon-aeronautics/#/
I need this assignment to be private and not shared on the internet please.
I need this paper done by tomorrow by 6PM (MAY 3, 2020)
Your company wants to implement a Virtual Private Network for employees that work remotely. Research remote virtual computing software products not covered in the textbook readings for this topic. Then, provide a 750- to 1,000-word report to the company’s CIO that includes the following:
1. Compare the top VPN products on the market.
2. Find out how the security features of VPN products may benefit the organization.
3. Provide three suggestions for VPN products for the company. Explain your ideal choice for the corporation.
Note: You must use at least one credible reference.
While GCU style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using GCU formatting guidelines, which can be found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
My company I have chose to do my projects for is: Canyon Aeronautics
Link to my company’s website:
https://lc.gcumedia.com/itt115/company-website-profiles/v2.1/canyon-aeronautics/#/
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| ITT-116 | ITT-116-O500 | Virtual Private Networking (VPN) | 40.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% | |||||||
| Comparison of the Top SSL VPN Products on the Market | 20.0% | Comparison is incomplete or not submitted. | The student compares the top SSL VPN products on the market but requires details. Little subject knowledge is evident. | The student compares the top SSL VPN products on the market with some details. Subject knowledge appears to be decent. | The student compares the top SSL VPN products on the market with supporting details. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | The student comprehensively compares the top SSL VPN products on the market with extensive details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. | ||
| Explanation of How the Security Features of SSL VPN Products May Benefit the Organization | 30.0% | Explanation is incomplete or not submitted. | The student explains how the security features of SSL VPN products may benefit the organization, but requires details. Little subject knowledge is evident. | The student explains how the security features of SSL VPN products may benefit the organization with some details. Subject knowledge appears to be decent. | The student explains how the security features of SSL VPN products may benefit the organization with supporting details. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | The student comprehensively explains how the security features of SSL VPN products may benefit the organization. Subject knowledge is excellent. | ||
| Recommendation of How to Choose the Right SSL VPN for the Company | Recommendation is incomplete or not submitted. | The student recommends how to choose the right SSL VPN for the company but requites details. Little subject knowledge is evident. | The student recommends how to choose the right SSL VPN for the company with some details. Subject knowledge appears to be decent. | The student recommends how to choose the right SSL VPN for the company with supporting details. Subject knowledge appears to be good. | The student comprehensively recommends how to choose the right SSL VPN for the company. Subject knowledge is excellent. | |||
| Sources | 10.0% | No outside academic sources are used to support major points. | Few relevant sources beyond assigned readings are used to support major points. Important relevant sources are neglected. Quoted material and paraphrasing are overused. | Sources are adequate, relevant, and extend beyond assigned readings. Quoted material and paraphrasing are included to support major points and writer’s idea development. | Sources are academic, current, and/or relevant to support major points. Quoted material and paraphrasing is used effectively and consistently to support the major points and writer’s idea development. | Sources are academic, comprehensive, current, and/or relevant. Quoted material and paraphrasing expertly support, extend, and inform ideas but do not substitute for the writer’s own idea development. Sources are well synthesized to support major points. | ||
| Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 5.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
