Which political party do you more closely associate with and why? Your choices include Republican, Democrat, Green Party, Libertarian, Communist – you don’t even have to stick with these if there is another one out there you identify with – just tell me why. After you take a stance on one of these, you are required to take the quiz at the link below. You may have done this in the past, but please do it again.
Even if you are pretty sure of who you side with, it is fun (and required) to take because it will give you percentages of how much you agree with each party on certain issues and tell you which candidate is your best match. No one is 100% anything. I cannot emphasize this enough, you must include, discuss and analyze your results in your paper. In the analysis, include your top three percentages and analyze and discuss the answer you gave that most likely led to those identifications. This should be a well developed paragraph or two of questions and answers you provided that most likely led to you being identified with the top three ideologies in your results. Next, choose the bottom two percentages and do the same. This should be a well developed paragraph or two of questions and answers you provided that most likely led to you being identified with the bottom two ideologies in your results. Finally, discuss some of the people the quiz said you aligned with and possible reasons why. Several students a year tell me what party they favor, but they do not develop this part of the paper sufficiently to earn all of the points in this section. The objective is for you to analyze the political ideals and your responses that led the quiz to identify you with a particular party.
2. Who or what influenced that decision (examples may be a parent, teacher, friend, event). Do you have friends or family that hold the opposite beliefs from you? If not, why not? Do you have debates with this person or do you only talk to people who agree with you? If so, why? A paper that simply states that no one influenced their results will not receive as much credit as one that analyzes their own beliefs and discusses you shaped their thinking. This could even be an opposite stance from the person that shaped your ideology. Make sure to review primary and secondary socialization factors in Chapter 6 to answer this question completely. Include both primary and secondary political influencers of your ideology. Discuss all of the above mentioned in detail.
3. If you could run for office, what would you run for – Judge, Congress/Legislature or President/Governor – and why? Read the explanations of all three below to help you answer this. Make sure that your answer is thorough.
What office you might want to run for says something about your personality:
Judge – You are comfortable making decisions that may make some people unhappy, but you try to settle disputes by finding middle ground – all while remaining in the confines of the law. You understand that your decisions may not change the world, but they are important to the people and the case in front of you. You right wrongs and mete out appropriate justice – and you can only do so because you follow the rules yourself.
Legislator/Congress – You like to represent people and fight passionately for their issues. Making laws is ugly work, but you will fight in the trenches for what you believe in and make only the concessions necessary to create a bill that will help your constituents and your ideology win the day. You realize you don’t need to make everyone happy – just the people in your district and your party. The executives (governor/president) talk a lot, but you actually get to the details and get stuff done.
Governor/President – You are the big picture person. You announce broad initiatives and let congress or the legislature figure out how to pull it off. You need to have a thick skin because just under half of your constituents resent the fact you got elected. You have little to no say in the details of how your vision is pulled off – you just provide leadership and motivation. You get the credit when it works, but you get the blame when it doesn’t – you probably deserve neither the blame nor the credit. People look for you to lead them in both good times and bad.
The rules: Remember, this needs to be at least three pages of solid, thoughtful material in order to even be considered for full credit. Students receiving full credit usually turn in papers of at least 4 to 5 pages. Have some fun with it, but remember this is an academic paper. No cussing or slang, use proper grammar and proof-read before sending, use the spell-checker, do not end a sentence with a question mark (you are supposed to answer questions, not ask them), et cetera.
Make sure that you give a complete analysis of why you would run for which and not just I choose this and not discuss completely.