After re-reading the chapters and conducting additional research, you should be able to list the advantages of switching to IPv6, including the benefits of auto-configuration, better traffic prioritization and delivery assurance, better inherent security, and a virtually endless supply of IP addresses. On the other hand, transitioning to IPv6 is not always seamless. Therefore, in 750-1,000 words, address the following:
- What is the network’s supportability with both IPv4 and IPv6 during its transition?
- How will you ensure that all of the network’s applications and TCP/IP services also support IPv6?
- How will you coordinate with other organizations with which the networks connected to determine how to handle their IPv4 or IPv6 traffic?
- How will you devise a new addressing approach for the network?
- How will you address networking hardware compatibility and addressing?
- How will you address outward-facing application compatibility and addressing?
A few notes to keep in mind:
1) My essay should relate to the corporate company I have selected for my projects, which is Canyon Aeronautics (see attachment).
2)This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
3) This paper is due on Sunday at 11:59 PM. I will need it by tomorrow midnight if possible please because I need to submit it to Lopeswrite for any plagiarism.
After re-reading the chapters and conducting additional research, you should be able to list the advantages of switching to IPv6, including the benefits of auto-configuration, better traffic prioritization and delivery assurance, better inherent security, and a virtually endless supply of IP addresses. On the other hand, transitioning to IPv6 is not always seamless. Therefore, in 750-1,000 words, address the following:
1. What is the network’s supportability with both IPv4 and IPv6 during its transition?
2. How will you ensure that all of the network’s applications and TCP/IP services also support IPv6?
3. How will you coordinate with other organizations with which the networks connected to determine how to handle their IPv4 or IPv6 traffic?
4. How will you devise a new addressing approach for the network?
5. How will you address networking hardware compatibility and addressing?
6. How will you address outward-facing application compatibility and addressing?
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
My company I have chose to do my projects for is: Canyon Aeronautics
Link to my company’s website:
https://lc.gcumedia.com/itt115/company-website-profiles/v2.1/canyon-aeronautics/#/
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||||||||
ITT-116 | ITT-116-O500 | Transitioning to IPv6 | 40.0 | |||||||||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) | Satisfactory (75.00%) | Good (85.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | ||||||
100.0% | ||||||||||||||
Network Supportability: Transition, Support, and Traffic | 3 | 5.0% | The student provides incomplete coverage of the problem/issues under investigation. | The student outlines a few of the components of the problem/issues under investigation; details are lacking. | The student appropriately describes most of the components of the problem/issues under investigation; some rationales are included. | The student provides detailed components of the problem/issues under investigation; rationales are accurate. | The student comprehensively provides all components of the problem/issues under investigation. The student draws warranted conclusions. Information and rationales are accurate and appropriate. | |||||||
Approach, Hardware, and Application Compatibility | ||||||||||||||
Sources | 10.0% | No outside academic sources are used to support major points. | Few relevant sources beyond assigned readings are used to support major points. Important relevant sources are neglected. Quoted material and paraphrasing are overused. | Sources are adequate, relevant, and extend beyond assigned readings. Quoted material and paraphrasing are included to support major points and writer’s idea development. | Sources are academic, current, and/or relevant to support major points. Quoted material and paraphrasing is used effectively and consistently to support the major points and writer’s idea development. | Sources are academic, comprehensive, current, and/or relevant. Quoted material and paraphrasing expertly support, extend, and inform ideas but do not substitute for the writer’s own idea development. Sources are well synthesized to support major points. | ||||||||
Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||||||||
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | |||||||||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. | |||||||||
Total Weightage | 100% |