please see attached
Strategic
Plan, Part
3
: Strategic
Evaluation and Recommendation
Grading
Guide
STR/581
Version
12
Strategic Plan, Part 3: Strategic
Evaluation and Recommendation Grading
Guide
STR/581 Version 12
Strategic Planning and Implementation
Copyright
Copyright
©
2017
by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other co
untries. All
other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these ma
rks is not intended
to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Individual Assignment: Strategic Plan, Part 3: Strategic Evaluation and Recommendation
Purpose of Assignment
Students explore a variety of strategies. They then make their recommendations for strategies or a combination of strategies for the organization.
Resources Required
Strategic Plan: Part 1, Strategic Plan: Part 2
Grading Guide
Content |
Met |
Partially Met |
Not Met |
Comments: |
||||
The paper uses the organization selected in Week 1. |
|
|||||||
The paper includes an evaluation of the potential business-level strategies for the organization. |
||||||||
The paper includes an assessment of the potential corporate-level strategies for the organization. |
||||||||
The paper includes the assessment of the potential global strategies for the organization. |
||||||||
The paper includes a recommendation of a strategy or combination of strategies the organization should implement and includes a rationale for that recommendation. |
||||||||
The paper is a minimum of 1,050 words in length. |
||||||||
Total Available |
Total Earned |
|||||||
85 |
#/85 |
Writing Guidelines |
||
Organization |
||
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. |
||
The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. |
||
Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
||
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews the major points. |
||
Mechanics |
||
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. |
||
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. |
||
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. |
||
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. |
||
|
35 |
#/35 |
Assignment Total |
# |
120 |
#/120 |
Additional comments: |
Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Strategic Plan, Part 3: Strategic
Evaluation and Recommendation
Grading
Guide
STR/581
Version
12
Strategic Planning and Implementation
Copyright
Copyright ©
2017
by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other co
untries. All
other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these ma
rks is not intended
to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
Strategic Plan, Part 3: Strategic
Evaluation and Recommendation Grading
Guide
STR/581 Version 12
Strategic Planning and Implementation
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All
other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended
to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.
STR/581: Strategic Planning & Implementation
Wk 4 – Strategic Plan, Part 3: Strategic Evaluation
Top of Form
Resource:
Strategic Plan Part 3: Strategic Evaluation and Recommendation Grading Guide
In this section, you will be evaluating various strategies and making recommendations for the organization.
Write a 1,050-word minimum strategic evaluation in which you include the following:
· Evaluate potential business level strategies for the organization.
· Assess potential corporate level strategies for the organization.
· Assess potential global strategies for the organization.
· Recommend a strategy or combination of strategies the organization should implement, and include a rationale for that recommendation.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.