Project deliverable: Possibilities for products include development of a manuscript for an approved journal, a poster, a presentation for a professional conference, and others. If you have an idea about how you would like to satisfy this requirement that is not listed, contact your course instructor to discuss it further and obtain approval. Also include a short paper to describe the requirements of the conference, journal, etc. you will submit.
School of Nursing
DNP 767 Project Deliverable Grading Rubric
1
Criteria Excellent Proficient Meets Standards Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Dissemination
Potential
(140 points)
The DNP project
holds the potential for
publication or
dissemination
through other means.
The submission for a
national conference
presentation, article
or poster was clear
and complete.
Appropriate content,
overall process and
findings were
included in the
submission. Content
met the submission
requirements for the
proposed submission
venue.
The submission for a
national conference
presentation, article
or poster was clear
and complete the
majority of the time.
One key area was
not fully developed or
needed clarity.
Appropriate content,
overall process and
findings were
included in the
submission. Content
met the submission
requirements for the
proposed venue.
The submission for a
national conference
presentation, article
or poster was clear
and complete the
majority of the time.
Two to three key
areas not fully
developed or needed
clarity. Content,
overall process and
findings were
included in the
submission but may
need additional
clarity. Content met
the submission
requirements for the
proposed venue.
Four or more areas
require significant
revision or content
requires revision in
one to three areas to
meet standards for
proposed venue.
Six or more areas
require significant
revision or content
does not meet
standards for
proposed venue
including three or
more areas.
Topic and Audience
(20 points)
Topic and audience
including journal for
submission or venue
for presentation are
clearly delineated.
Submission reflects
the venue and
audience for which it
is being developed.
References are
current and
appropriate to
support the content.
Topic and audience
including journal for
submission or venue
for presentation are
clearly delineated.
Submission reflects
the venue and
audience for which it
is being developed
80% of the time.
References are
current and
appropriate to
Topic and audience
including journal for
submission or venue
for presentation are
clearly delineated.
Submission reflects
the venue and
audience for which it
is being developed
60% of the time.
References are
current and
Topic and audience
including journal for
submission or venue
for presentation may
not be clearly
delineated.
Submission overall
does not reflect the
venue and audience
for which it is being
developed.
References may not
be current or are not
Missing information
regarding topic and
audience and/or
inappropriate
audience chosen for
dissemination.
School of Nursing
DNP 767 Project Deliverable Grading Rubric
2
Criteria Excellent Proficient Meets Standards Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory
Topic reflects DNP
Project and the
projected venue for
submission.
support the content.
Topic reflects DNP
Project and the
projected venue for
submission.
appropriate to
support the content.
appropriate to
support the content.
Topic reflects DNP
Project but differs
from requirements for
the presentation,
poster, or journal
submission.
Clarity, Readability,
Relevance
(40 points)
Writing is relevant to
the topic and is
presented logically
and clearly using
standard English
language. Application
and synthesis of
scholarly information
is easily discernible in
submission. Word
choice is correct,
precise and
unambiguous.
Sentence structure or
bullet points are
clear, concise and
well- constructed.
Poster or slide
presentations are
clear, uncluttered and
easy to read.
Writing is relevant to
the topic but is
unclear in 1-2 areas.
Writing is presented
logically using
standard English
language.
Applications and
synthesis of scholarly
information is easily
discernible within the
submission. Poster or
slide presentations
are clear and
uncluttered. Type or
format may make
submission difficult to
read.
Writing may lack
some logic or clarity
in 3-4 areas but is
overall discernible.
Application and
synthesis of scholarly
information is easily
discernible. Poster or
slide presentations
are clear and
uncluttered in 60% of
the work. Type, color
or format may make
submission difficult to
read in one or two
slides or within the
journal submission.
Most sections of the
submission are
unclear and difficult
to read. Relevance to
the submission venue
is difficult to discern.
Poster or slide
presentations are
cluttered. Words may
not be focused or to
small; color of
lettering may be
difficult to read.
All sections of
submission are
unclear and are
difficult to read.
Writing lacks
relevance to the
submission. Poster or
slide presentation is
disjointed, cluttered,
includes graphics or
pictures that are not
reflective of content
or otherwise lacks
relevance to the
submission.