I uploaded a literary essay that I had already done but I need that based on that article you make a poster where you answer the questions that are asked there. I uploaded the template and uploaded an example of the template so you can guide yourself, as well as what my teacher asks me, all in different documents. I need you to make tables and charts, you’ll see the examples in everything I give you as a guide. If you have any questions please contact me, thanks.
Poster Presentation
Students this project will allow you to formulate and hypothetically develop your own research project. The purpose of this project is for the student to follow all of the different steps in a research project on an already published article and presented as a poster presentation. A poster session or poster presentation is the presentation of research information by an individual or representatives of research teams at a congress or conference with an academic or professional focus. The work is usually peer reviewed. Poster sessions are particularly prominent at scientific conferences such as medical congresses.
Students will select a nursing research already published and following the article information you will create a poster presentation that include the below information:
The outline of the poster should include the following tabs (minimum requirements)
Abstract Outline:
-Title of Project
-Problem Statement: what is the problem that needs fixing?
-Purpose of the Project
-Research Question(s)
-Hypothesis
-Methodology (Qualitative vs. Quantitative)
-Steps in implementing your project
-Limitations
Results (Pretend results)
-Conclusion
-References
I have attached an example of a poster presentation for guidance. The due date for the poster presentation is WEEK 13. Please feel free to be artistic and provide graphs and data. You are welcome to use any poster template. Please submit it via turn it in.
|
Criterion |
Outstanding 4 |
Very Good 3 |
Good 2 |
Unacceptable 1 |
Score |
|
Completeness |
Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements |
Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements |
Incomplete many respects; reflects few requirements |
Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements |
|
|
Understanding |
Demonstrates excellent understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
|
|
Analysis |
Presents an insightful and through analysis of the issue (s) identified |
Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issue(s) identified |
Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issue(s) identified |
Presents an incomplete analysis of the issue(s) identified. |
|
|
Evaluation |
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied |
Makes appropriate connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied |
Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied |
Makes little or no connection between the issue(s) identified and the concept(s) studied. |
|
|
Opinion |
Supports opinion with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective |
Supports opinion with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective |
Supports opinion with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument |
Supports opinion with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective. |
|
|
Recommendations |
Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts studied |
Presents specific, realistic and appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied |
Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation supported by the information presented and the concepts studied |
Presents realistic or appropriate recommendation with little, if any, support from the information and the concepts studied. |
|
|
Grammar and Spelling |
Minimal spelling and grammar errors |
Some spelling and grammar errors |
Noticeable spelling and grammar errors |
Unacceptable number of spelling and grammar errors |
|
|
APA guidelines |
Uses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite sources |
Uses APA guidelines with minor violations to cite sources |
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA guidelines |
Does not use APA guidelines |
|
|
Total |
Titleof Project
Presenter Name
University name
Introduction and Problem
Variables
Descriptive Data
Results
Results (cont
.
)
Clinical Questions/PICOT
Discussion
Project Limitations
Conclusion and Recommendations
Purpose of the Project
Data Analysis
References
.
.
.
.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008
www.PosterPresentations.com
1
Titleof Project
Presenter Name
University name
Introduction and Problem
Variables
Descriptive Data
Results
Results (cont
.
)
Clinical Questions/PICOT
Discussion
Project Limitations
Conclusion and Recommendations
Purpose of the Project
The data analysis was in line with the needs of the project: statistical tests, including t-test and Wilcoxon signed ranks, were employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between pre- and post-test measurements
.
This way, the relationships between the independent and dependent variables were reliably inferred (Polit & Beck, 2017)
Data types:
Survey: quantitative, ordinal (Likert scale).
Reports: quantitative, ratio (number of mistakes).
Data analysis approaches:
Software: SPSS.
Survey: Wilcoxon signed ranks test.
Reports: paired t-test.
Data Analysis
The project employed four Advanced Practice Registered Nurses, three Medical Doctors, and one Physician Assistant who exhibited significant resistance to the use of EHR.
References
.
.
Several studies have shown the benefits of the use of electronic health records (EHR) for patients’ safety, as well as their ability to improve efficiency in primary care settings (Porterfield, Engelbert, & Coustasse, 2014). Regardless of the positive effects of the implementation of EHR, health care providers have moved slowly to adopt this technology (King, Patel, Jamoom, & Furukawa, 2014). Practitioners who do not want to adopt EHR, especially electronic prescription, can endanger patient safety.
Medication errors, in turn, are a serious issue that causes numerous safety incidents in primary care. Studies have shown that the use of EHR significantly reduces the number of prescription errors that can harm patients (Liao et al., 2017). Palabindala, Pamarthy, and Jonnalagadda (2016) showed that the use of EHR could reduce medication error while also resulting in improved communications between patients and healthcare teams
The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental project was to determine if there was a relationship between the application of an educational program and the improvement of practitioners’ perception of EHR usability, as well as the reduction of the number of prescription medication errors, at a medical group practice in the Southeastern of the United States (US).
The PICOT question created for the project was as follows: (P) Among healthcare practitioners, (I) how does the implementation of an educational program in a primary care medical center in the Southeast of the US (C) compared to the pre-intervention measurements in the prior four weeks (O) influences primary care practitioners’ perceptions of the usability of EHR and the incidence of prescription medication errors (T) within four weeks of participating in the program?
The following clinical questions guide this quantitative project:
Q1: How does the implementation of an educational program influence the perceptions of primary care practitioners regarding EHR usability?
Q2: How does the implementation of an educational program influence prescription medication error incidence?
Variable 1: Quality improvement educational program (independent)
Variable 2: Primary care practitioners’ perception of EHR usability (dependent)
Variable3: Number of prescription medication errors (dependent).
The educational program can enhance the participants’ perceptions regarding EHR, but the described project cannot reject the null hypothesis that the intervention had no effects on the medication error rates. However, since the project was constricted by significant limitations, this finding is not conclusive.
Some of the research recommendations include the proposal to increase the sample size, have a greater timeframe for future projects, and consider randomizing the sample into two groups.
The project can also be used to recommend educational EHR efforts for the reduction of EHR resistance and the specific program that has been tested for the same purpose.
The sample was small (8 participants) and could not be expanded because the facility was small.
The data collection process was limited by the short time allocated to observing the results (4 weeks)
The project employed a quasi-experimental design. Since its sample was so small, trying to split it further was not feasible.
King, J., Patel, V., Jamoom, E. W., & Furukawa, M. F. (2014). Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: National findings. Health Services Research, 49(1pt2), 392–404. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12135
Liao, T. V., Rabinovich, M., Abraham, P., Perez, S., DiPlotti, C., Han, J., … Honig, E. (2017). Evaluation of medication errors with implementation of electronic health record technology in the medical intensive care unit. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials, 9, 31-40. doi: 10.2147/OAJCT.S131211
Porterfield, A., Engelbert, K., & Coustasse, A. (2014). Electronic prescribing: Improving the efficiency and accuracy of prescribing in the ambulatory care setting. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 2014, 1-13
Palabindala, V., Pamarthy, A., & Jonnalagadda, N. R. (2016). Adoption of electronic health records and barriers. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 6(5), 1-3. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.32643
Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
The survey contained 11 individual items and used a Likert scale in which 1 stood for an extremely negative assessment of an aspect of usability or usefulness and 5 referred to an extremely positive one. The summary of the mean and standard deviation for each of the items before and after the intervention is presented in Table 1.
. The raw data indicate that the most common errors for the clinic include incorrect dosage, incorrect drug, and drug-drug interaction, as well as incorrect frequency and drug omission.
Table 4 presents the results of the paired t-test analysis of the errors that occurred and those that were reported. No statistically significant differences were found for either pair (p>0.05). Thus, the findings do not suggest that the program had an impact on medication error rates; a relationship between the independent variable and medication errors was not found.
Example changes in pre- and post-test scores can be found in Figure 4. Table 2 summarizes the results of analyzing the survey items with the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 demonstrate statistically significant results (p<=0.05).
Therefore, the intervention improved the perceptions of the participants regarding the effect of EHR on one’s performance and job effectiveness, the usefulness of EHR, the clarity of interacting with the system, the ease of EHR use, and the use of EHR for clinical care and research. The relationship between the independent variable (program) and perceptions (one of the dependent variables) was found.
Figure 1. The occupations of the participants.
Figure 2. Age of the participants.
Figure 3. Gender of the participants.
Figure 4. Example changes in survey results before and after the intervention.
As had been planned, the data were collected before and after the intervention using an already established survey tool and the clinic’s pharmacy call reports regarding medication errors.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008
www.PosterPresentations.com
1
Table 2
Survey Analysis Results Summary
Item Significance (1-tailed)
Q1 0.04
Q2 0.07
Q3 0.04
Q4 0.04
Q5 0.05
Q6 0.03
Q7 0.04
Q8 0.04
Q9 0.03
Q10 0.04
Q11 0.244
Table 1
Survey Summary
Item Pre-Test Post-Test
Mean St. Deviation Mean St. Deviation
Q1 2.25 0.707 4.75 0.463
Q2 2.13 0.991 4.38 0.744
Q3 1.75 0.707 4.38 0.744
Q4 2.25 0.707 4.75 0.463
Q5 2.13 0.991 5 0
Q6 1.63 0.744 4.75 0.463
Q7 2.38 0.744 4.38 0.518
Q8 2 0.756 4.13 0.641
Q9 2.25 0.886 5 0
Q10 1.63 0.518 5 0
Q11 4 0.756 4.38 0.518
Table 3
Error Data Summary
Error Type Number
Occurred
Number
Occurred
Number
Reported
Number
Reported
Incorrect Drug 3 4 3 4
Incorrect Dose 5 3 6 4
Incorrect Generic Selection 0 1 0 1
Outdated Product 0 0 0 0
Drug Unavailable/Omission 3 2 2 3
Incorrect Dosage Form 1 2 0 3
Incorrect Patient 3 3 2 4
Allergic Drug Reaction 1 0 1 0
Drug-drug Interaction 4 2 4 2
Incorrect time 1 2 1 2
Incorrect Route 1 2 1 2
Incorrect Frequency 3 3 4 3
Illegible or Ambiguous Prescription 3 0 4 0
Other 3 4 3 4
Total 31 28 31 32
Table 4
Total Errors Analysis Results: Paired Samples Test
Sig. (2-tailed)
Pair 1 .587
Pair 2 .846
OPIOID IN ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
1
ARTICLE CRITIQUE
9
Opioid use and the presence of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias among elderly Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic pain conditions
Chan Shen, Xiaohui Zhao, Nilanjana Dwibedi, R. Constance Wiener, Patricia A. Findley & Usha Sambamoorthi
Odanayza Casanola Chavez
Article title: Opioid use and the presence of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias among elderly Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic pain conditions
Authors: Chan Shen, Xiaohui Zhao, Nilanjana Dwibedi, R. Constance Wiener, Patricia A. Findley & Usha Sambamoorthi
Introduction
Summary: The study by Shen et al. (2018) represents a retrospective-cross-sectional study which aimed at determining the relationship between ADRD (Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias) and opioids prescription among elderly patients as compared to their counterparts without ADRD. Through the use of Medicare beneficiaries from 2006 to 2013, the study was able to determine the fact that opioids prescription among elderly patients with ADRD is comparatively lower than their non-ADRD counterparts hence leading to possibly unmet pain management needs for elderly patients with ADRD. This trend is largely caused by the unfounded notion that opioids use have negative effects among ADRD patients in as far as worsening ADRD symptoms is concerned.
Problem: The fundamental problem that informed this study has been clearly stated. Arguably, the problem is quite practical owing to the fact that pain is a major cause of low quality of life among elderly persons. There have been a lot of fears associated with opioids use among elderly patients with ADRD due to the assumptions that opioids may exacerbate ADRD symptoms. Although opioids have been evidently associated with major pain relief capabilities- their use among ADRD patients experiencing pain is minimal. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that there is great risk of going with unmet pain management needs among elderly persons with ADRD as compared to their counterparts without ADRD.
While the research questions have not been explicitly highlighted, it is apparent that as can be extrapolated from the research aims- the primary research questions that the study pursued to answer relates to whether opioids use in elderly patients is in any way linked to increased risk of ADRD and whether elderly patients with ADRD are more likely to endure sub-optimal pain management due to limited prescription of opioids. The researchers utilized a sample of n= 19,347 participants who were Medicare beneficiaries between 2006 and 2013. Among these participants, 7.7% of them had ADRD and the rest were ADRD-free. By analyzing opioids prescription for this period, the study found out that participants with ADRD received less opioids prescriptions as compare to their non-ADRD counterparts therefore confirming that community-dwelling elderly patients with ADRD are more likely to experience unmet pain management needs. In addition to that, the key terms have been clearly highlighted and defined.
Evaluation of research methods
Does the author provide a literature review?
Although there is no particular section that has been purely focused on literature review, it is apparent that a comprehensive review of literature has been conducted especially in the description of the background of the study. The ultimate purpose of a literature review is to retrieve any related research information that has been published in relation to a research topic (Ellis, 2019). This serves the purpose of validating the research based on an identified gap. This is something that the study has appreciably done and there is sufficient utilization of existing literature not only to show case the existing information about the topic but also to validate the need for research enquiry on the area of opioids prescription among elderly patients with ADRD.
Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?
The sources of literature that have been used include systematic reviews, quantitative studies and qualitative studies on this topic. These use of these literature sources means that the literature is based on best sources of evidence (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2017). In addition to that, the sources of the literature fall within the last one decade prior to the publication of the study. This means that the research is current and tuned with the present-day healthcare practice in as far as opioids use is concerned. Arguably, use of recent and up-to-date literature translates to increased credibility and sound understanding of a research issue under enquiry and that the knowledge utilized is tuned with the current research knowledge.
Describe the research type utilized? – Experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
The research is non-experimental in nature since there are no causal relationships being established. In this connection, the study can be termed as largely explorative or descriptive in nature since it uses published data on opioids use to describe trends and patterns of opioids prescription among elderly patients with ADRD as compared to elderly patients without ADRD.
Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
The sample size of any study goes a long way when it comes to influencing the generalizability of research findings. A good sample should be able to represent the larger sample of population under study in terms of age, gender and other pertinent demographic characteristics (Dale, Hallas & Spratling, 2019). The sample size in this study is large and sufficient to paint a clear picture of the issue being investigated. The use of this sample size enhances the accuracy and generalizability of research findings in multiple care settings or scenario. The sample is well represented in terms of gender and there is an even distribution of people from all socio-economic and literacy levels. In addition to that, the sample was inclusive enough since information had been retrospectively retrieved from factual clinical data between 2006 and 2013. In this regard this prevents any room for bias in as far as sample selection is concerned.
How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied?
This work and the subsequent findings are quite practical. Arguably, pain is a major impediment towards enjoying a high quality of life for elderly patients. The exclusive or somewhat discriminatory use of opioids for certain elderly populations such as those with ADRD is not warranted and leaves them enduring pain due to denied access to opioids for pain management. There is no scientific evidence that links ADRD with opioids and for that reason- healthcare professionals seem to prescribe opioids based on personal persuasions and unfounded evidence. The authors therefore suggest that real life practice should embrace use of opioids for all patient populations including those with ADRD so as to enhance quality of life through effective pain management. However, it is important to acknowledge that the use of opioids should be done in line with existing guidelines and practice protocols in order to prevent the possible scenario of addiction.
Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved.
Definitely, the study could have been improved since the issue of opioids use among elderly patients present different facets. The study could thus be improved through incorporating views from elderly patients on opioids for pain management as well as the views of healthcare professionals about their attitudes about opioids use among elderly patients with ADRD. This could have fostered a holistic understanding of the research issue from different perspectives other than clinical data. In this regard, this improvement could have been made through the use of a mixed approach that utilizes both quantifiable clinical data relating to opioids use as well as a qualitative approach that seeks to understand different opinions surrounding opioids use for the study population.
Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?
The article has been written clearly and concisely making it easy for the reader to go through the entire piece without encountering an area of ambiguity. To aid in reading and understanding the research article, the authors have gone an extra mile to define complex terms. In addition to that, there is smooth transition from one section to the other or from one idea to the next hence making it easy to follow through the entire article effectively.
Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
It is apparent that opioids use among the elderly patients may be associated with various behavioral problems such as addiction. The use of opioids for management should be done in the most cautious manner to prevent these negative effects. In this regard, future research can be done on characterization of pain in terms of pain intensity and duration and subsequently assist in providing guidelines on which pain characteristics qualify for opioids prescription. Finally, future research can also focus on coming up with factual evidence-based guidelines that can be used to come up with noble prescription opioids practices. It is through such an approach that the larger healthcare system can strike a healthy balance between the pain management needs of elderly persons and the need to shelter elderly persons from various possible behavioral and psychological effects of opioids.
Conclusion
In conclusion it is apparent that opioids use for pain management among elderly patients with chronic pain has been an area of much scholarly and scientific debate. Some quotas hypothesize that opioids increase the risk of dementia or Alzheimer’s among this patient population. Nevertheless, there is no tangible scientific evidence that supports this claim. Such notions have led to decreased use of opioids among elderly patients with chronic pain due to the dementia-related fear. To a large extent, this leaves many elderly patients enduring chronic pain with potential unmet or sub-optimally met pain management needs. In this regard, the findings of this study are of great significance and ought to influence future practice and other similar research undertakings. Old age and frailty attract a myriad of physiological alterations that can hamper the quality of life of elderly persons. For instance, this group of patients experience age-related conditions such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal pains and different forms of cancer.
All these conditions are characterized by severe levels of pain that compromise quality of life and hence lead to impaired uptake of daily living activities and independence (Wang, Hill, Gomes, Pinto, Wijeysundera, Scales & Wunsch, 2020). Opioids have been evidently associated with significant positive effects in as far as pain management is concerned. Therefore, it is not logical to withhold prescription of opioids for elderly persons due to the unfounded fear of the link between opioids and dementia/Alzheimer’s. Nevertheless, there is the need to acknowledge that long-term use of opioids may attract behavioral problems such as addictions and hence the need to use the currently existing standards on opioids prescription so as to shelter elderly patients from the risk of addiction of opioids dependence (Wang, Hill, Gomes, Pinto, Wijeysundera, Scales & Wunsch, 2020). For instance, there is the accentuation to monitor behavioral outcomes for elderly patients under opioids prescription so as to identify signs of addiction beforehand and subsequently pursue interventional measures.
References
Dale, J. C., Hallas, D., & Spratling, R. (2019). Critiquing Research Evidence for Use in Practice: Revisited. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 33(3), 342-346.
Ellis, P. (2019). Critiquing research: general points. Evidence-based Practice in Nursing, 46.
LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2017). Nursing research-E-book: methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Shen, C., Zhao, X., Dwibedi, N., Wiener, R. C., Findley, P. A., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2018). Opioid use and the presence of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias among elderly Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with chronic pain conditions. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 4, 661-668.
Wang, H. T., Hill, A. D., Gomes, T., Pinto, R., Wijeysundera, D. N., Scales, D. C., … & Wunsch, H. (2020). Trends in opioid use before critical illness among elderly patients in Ontario. Journal of critical care, 55, 128-133.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
