In this assignment, you must answer the “Answer Implying Guilty,” and the “Answer Implying Not Guilty” questions. Both responses must start by stating either “Yes” or “No” for each charge and a brief summary that explains why. One example of the first question was provided.
IMPORTANT: ALL IMPLYING GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS “NO” RESPONSES AND ALL IMPLYING NOT GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS ‘YES’ RESPONSES.
Name:
In this assignment, you must answer the “Answer Implying Guilty,” and the “Answer Implying Not Guilty” questions. Both responses must start by stating either “Yes” or “No” for each charge and a brief summary that explains why. One example of the first question was provided.
IMPORTANT: ALL IMPLYING GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS “NO” RESPONSES AND ALL IMPLYING NOT GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS ‘YES’ RESPONSES.
Question |
Answer Implying Guilty |
Answer Implying
Not Guilty |
|
EXAMPLE: |
Could other DLP traders have manipulated GEDS’s transaction systems like Kerviel did? |
No, the methods employed by Kerviel were so intricate that no one else could have replicated them. |
Yes, Kerviel did not have to customize the systems in any way in order to conceal his unauthorized and fictitious trades. |
1 |
|||
2 |
Was it typical for middle office employees to be promoted to the front office? |
||
3 |
When Kerviel worked in the middle office, did he show any unusual aptitude for manipulating the transaction systems? |
||
4 |
Did DLP have any rules or disincentives designed to deter traders like Kerviel from undertaking unauthorized trading? |
||
5 |
Why did Kerviel make such huge bets when he did not derive any personal benefit from the profits? |