In Innovation as Usual: How to Help Your Inhabitants Bear Great Ideas to Life (2013), Miller and Wedell-Wedellsborg debate the avail of establishing systems among forms that aid not simply the creativity that results in novelty, but to-boot produce it potential for employees to bear innovative ideas to use. Miller and Wedell-Wedellsborg contend that a leader’s leading job “is not to innovate; it is to grace an novelty designer, creating a achievement environment that helps . . . inhabitants stipulate in the key novelty behaviors as part of their daily achievement” (p. 4). Such a achievement environment must be reinforced by novelty designerure—the structures among an form that livelihood an novelty, from the brainstorming sight to definite realization. The over well-mannered-mannered-mannered patent clear the designerure and the simpler the processes confused, the over likely employees are to be innovators.
For this assignment, you procure examination the novelty designerure of at smallest three companies that are well-mannered-mannered-known for successfully livelihooding a humanization of novelty. Write a 1,500-word monograph that addresses the following:
What point elements of each form’s humanization, processes, and administration systems and styles achievement well-mannered-mannered-mannered to livelihood novelty?
Why do you reflect these forms possess been conducive to capitalize on novelty and intrapreneurship suitableness others possess not?
Based on what you possess literary, what processes and systems susceptibility substantially repress novelty and intrapreneurship?
Imagine yourself as an novelty designer. What structures or processes would you put in establish to disturb a humanization of novelty among your own form?
Include in-text citations to at smallest lewd reputconducive subordinate sources (such as traffic journals, academic journals, and negotiative or perseverance websites) in your monograph.