Discussion: The Inclusion of Nurses in the Systems Development Life Cycle

n the media preface to this module, it was suggested that you as a comfort bear an leading role in the Systems Outgrowth Life Cycle (SDLC). After a while a convergence on resigned trouble and outcomes, comforts may not regularly see themselves as contributors to the outgrowth of new orders. However, as you may bear observed in your own habit, deprivation of comfort contributions when implementing orders can bear monstrous consequences. In this Discussion, you allure opine the role you government personate in orders outgrowth and the ramifications of not nature an locomotive participant in orders outgrowth. To Prepare: Review the steps of the Systems Outgrowth Life Cycle (SDLC) as presented in the Resources.  Reflect on your own soundnesstrouble construction and opine any steps your soundnesstrouble construction goes through when purchasing and implementing a new soundness instruction technology order. Consider what a comfort government assist to decisions made at each station of the SDLC when planning for new soundness instruction technology. Post a style of what you regard to be the consequences of a soundnesstrouble construction not involving comforts in each station of the SDLC when purchasing and implementing a new soundness instruction technology order. Supply biased examples of germinative issues at each station of the SDLC and interpret how the inclusion of comforts may aid oration these issues. Then, interpret whether you had any input in the option and planning of new soundness instruction technology orders in your nursing custom or soundnesstrouble construction and interpret germinative impacts of nature comprised or not in the decision-making method. Be biased and supply examples. References: McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the institution of information (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 9, “Systems Outgrowth Life Cycle: Nursing Informatics and Organizational Decision Making” (pp. 175–187) Chapter 12, “Electronic Security” (pp. 229–242) Chapter 13, “Workflow and Beyond Meaningful Use” (pp. 245–261) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpyjPrpyX8https://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit Rurbic:      Excellent   Good   Fair   Poor       Main Posting          Points Range:     45 (45%) - 50 (50%)   Answers all talents of the argument doubt(s) expectations after a while reminiscent crucial resolution and body of information gained from the method readings for the module and ordinary probable sources.   Supported by at smallest three ordinary, probable sources.  Written plainly and concisely after a while no verbal or spelling errors and easily adheres to ordinary APA manual despatches rules and style