Prompt Questions/Essay
For the writing assignment, you can respond to as few/many prompt questions as you like, so long as you have written a combined 875-1000 words for each paper, which are equal to 3.5-4 pages in Times New Roman font size 12, double-spaced with 1” margins. This assignment will be due twice—at the end of Week 5 and at the end of Week 10. Or, if you prefer a family history project (or that of someone else) pertaining to migration, or any other topic related to the course, please seek permission from me no later than the second Friday of the Quarter. All papers are due on the last Friday of the Quarter, before Finals Week.
Paper Rubric (up to 5 points each)—must be about immigration/comparative perspective
- State thesis clearly–what are you trying to say? Be direct! This should be no more than a paragraph at the beginning. Also, have a descriptive title consistent with your topic.
- How you use evidence to support your statements–did you cite correctly? In simple terms, back up your argument. Always cite quotes and any claim a casual reader wouldn’t believe! If you need a citation style to follow, see the ASA Quick Tips Style Guide at the end of the syllabus.
- Analysis consistent with thesis statement. Be consistent throughout the paper. The thesis/intro statement should match the rest of the paper, and vice versa.
- Mechanics are good (grammar, sentence structure, and diction). To avoid long run-on sentences, where papers can get lost, write shorter sentences. Also, avoid colloquial and vague language.
- Use of in-class readings. For a weekly assignment, you can just reference the reading for that week/set of weeks pertaining to the question you’re responding to. If it’s a term paper, then you don’t have to use all in-course readings but demonstrate understanding of at least three of them, plus one scholarly source away from the syllabus. Term papers will be graded more strictly.
- Be original! Use your own words to describe/analyze. What does the topic/prompt mean to you? Limit quotes to one sentence.
- Prompt question: How does anti-immigrant racism connect to the rise of Trump and Brexit? Or, how do migrant populations resist xenophobic racism? Please explain.
- Prompt question: Just how old is our deportation apparatus and what are some of the more recent unintended consequences? Please explain.
- Prompt question: How does the assigned literature explain the difference between refugees and migrants and why? Please explain.
- pick any one or more prompt questions to solve.
Transnational Behavior in Comparative Perspective
The Relationship between Immigrant Integration and Transnationalism in
New York, El Paso, and Paris
Ernesto Castañeda, Maria Cristina Morales & Olga Ochoa
CMS 2 (3): 305–334
DOI: 10.5117/CMS2014.3.CAST
Abstract
This paper examines transnationalism across migrant generational statuses in
three urban centers. The objective of this study is to explore how immigrant
integration influences the maintenance of social and economic connections
with the communities-of-origin. To accomplish this objective we examine the
impact of socio-economic status and generational status (first to third) on
whether respondents remit, visit their communities-of-origin, or desire to
return. The data for this study is based on survey data collected in New York
City, New York, U.S.A.; El Paso, Texas, U.S.A.; and Paris, France. We find that
transnational practices differ across the three locations. In Paris we find
evidence of reactive transnationalism – looking abroad due to exclusion in
the new society. In New York, however, there is more support for resourcebased transnationalism – better legal and socioeconomic integration that
allows for more transnational involvement. Transnationalism in El Paso differs
from NYC and Paris in large part due to being located along the U.S.-Mexico
border. Surprisingly, we find that El Paso respondents are less transnational
than those in Paris or New York when it comes to remittances, visiting, and the
desire to return to the sending community. We conclude by proposing a new
typology of transnationalism that accentuates the contextual aspects of these
practices.
Keywords: migrant transnationalism, reactive transnationalism, remittances, third
generation, incorporation
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014 ET AL.
305
COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES
1
Introduction
Transnationalism can be simply defined as the back and forth movement
and exchanges between migrant sending and receiving communities.
Transnationalism has historically been a characteristic of migration (Espiritu, 1997; Foner, 1997; Gamio, [1930] 1971; Glenn, 2002; Massey, Alarcon,
Durand, & González, 1987; Sayad, 2004; Thomas & Znaniecki, 1918), but it
is not until recently that it has become an object of study in itself. The
pioneering research on transnationalism discovered this phenomenon
through ethnographic work with immigrant communities and the connections they kept with their migrant-sending communities (Glick Schiller,
2003; Levitt, 2001; R. C. Smith, 1998, 2006). For the most part, comparisons
were made through secondary sources or through the comparison of fieldwork findings (Basch, Glick Schiller, & Szanton-Blanc, 1994; Glick Schiller
& Fouron, 1998; R. C. Smith, 2003). Most recently, important articles have
analyzed this phenomena from quantitative and comparative perspectives
(de Haas & Fokkema, 2011; Dekker & Siegel, 2013; Guarnizo, Portes, &
Haller, 2003; Portes, Haller, & Guarnizo, 2002; Snel, Engbersen, & Leerkes,
2006). Despite such advances, the study of transnationalism has mostly
been applied to the first generation and less attention has been given to
the transnational behavior of the children and grandchildren of migrants.
This paper seeks to narrow this gap.
In this study we examine various migrant-sending and receiving sites
(New York, El Paso, and Paris) and describe transnational patterns across
several immigrant generations (1st, 1.5, 2nd, and 3rd) to further examine the
relationship between transnationalism and integration. In particular, our
objectives are to examine the association between socioeconomic status
and immigrant generation and whether or not 1) they visit the country-oforigin, 2) send remittances, and/or 3) wish to return. In addition, we evaluate the reactive transnationalism hypothesis, where negative integration
results in more visits and identification with the sending community (Itzigsohn & Giorguli-Saucedo, 2002). Furthermore, the socio-economic connections that individuals maintain with their communities-of-origin will
be assessed as indicators of transnationalism. The examination of these
patterns of transnationalism will focus on individuals of Latin American
descent in El Paso and New York City (NYC), and individuals of North
African-origin in Paris, France.
This paper is comparative on many levels (Martiniello, 2013). It compares transnational behavior across generations, models of integration,
immigrant groups, and geographical settings. It utilizes descriptive statis306
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014
TRANSNATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
tics to examine the various patterns of transnationalism of immigrants
living in three cities Paris, El Paso, and NYC. It compares two practices of
immigrant integration, the American one with de facto laissez-faire multicultural immigrant integration and the French case with a republican expectation of full assimilation (Bloemraad & Provine, 2013; Bowen, 2007;
Lacorne, 2003). Lastly, it examines differential locations that allow for a
comparison between remote and border forms of transnationalism, thus
contributing to scholarly discussions about the degree to which geographical proximity matters in regards to transnational behavior.
2
Transnationalism within Migration Studies
Traditionally, migration studies in the U.S. have focused on the processes
of immigrant integration into their host society (Alba & Nee, 2003; Brubaker, 2004; Gordon, 1964; Itzigsohn, 2009). Recently, scholarly attention has
turned to transnationalism. The term “transnationalism” is used in various
contexts and thus requires further clarification. In its broadest sense, transnationalism is the movement of capital, people, and ideas back and forth
political borders. Classic examples of transnationalism are corporations
such as Sony, HSBC, or Citibank which have headquarters in one country
but branches and operations across multiple nation-states (Sassen, 2001).
Scholars use a transnational lens to understand a series of presences, identities, and movements that do not map easily within the geographical
borders of contemporary nation-states.
Migration scholars use the term transnationalism to describe migration
while taking into account the twin processes of emigration and immigration (Sayad, 2004, 2006) and the social ties that keep emigrants connected
to their communities-of-origin (R. C. Smith, 2006; Tilly, 2007). This approach can also be taken for internal migration, in which case the sending
and receiving communities are part of the same national territory, but may
have enough cultural, ethnic, or economic differences to be studied under
this methodological framework (Besserer, 2004; Fitzgerald, 2009).
Transnationalism provides a framework to simultaneously consider the
role of the sending and receiving communities in migrant behavior. In
contrast to migration that largely focuses on long-term settlement, transnationalism examines the social, political, and economic processes at both
sending and receiving communities. Historically migration has not entailed the complete severance of ties with the sending society (Foner,
2000; Thomas & Znaniecki, 1918). Transnational studies show the strong
CASTAÑEDA ET AL.
307
COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES
connections that migrants share with their native country (R. C. Smith,
2006). Even exiles, political refugees, asylum seekers, and those migrating
to escape violence may engage in their own form of transnationalism
(Dufoix, 2008). We call this “refugee transnationalism,” which occurs
when groups escape a political regime and engage politically in the diaspora, send money, and create plans for regime change in the country-oforigin but we do not discuss it here for lack of space.
Transnationalism gained scholarly attention in the 1990s (Basch, et al.,
1994; Kearney, 1995; M. P. Smith & Guarnizo, 1998). Over the last several
decades, the academic sub-field of migrant transnationalism has grown
considerably. A great deal of effort has been spent on “proving” its existence by adding new case studies and debating whether it is a novel phenomenon or if it has historically existed before it was recognized and
labeled as transnationalism (Foner, 2000; Morawska, 2001). Some groundbreaking work in the field includes the introduction of the concept of
social remittances to discuss cultural changes at the migrant-sending side
(Levitt, 1998, 2001); the documentation of the role of religious institutions
in transnationalism (Levitt, 2007; Mooney, 2009; Pasura, 2011); the study of
the involvement of the sending state in fostering ties with the diaspora
(Cano & Delano, 2007; Delano, 2011; Fitzgerald, 2009; Iskander, 2006; R. C.
Smith, 2003), and transnational parenting (Abrego, 2009; Åkesson, Carling,
& Drotbohm, 2012; Castañeda & Buck, 2011, 2014; Dreby, 2010; Suarez-Orozco, Todorova, & Louie, 2002). Building upon on this literature, we ask to
what extent does first, 1.5, second, and third generations engage in transnational activities (Levitt & Waters, 2002)?
Given the relative novelty of transnationalism as a theoretical perspective and its particular emphasis on multi-sited field research as a method
(Marcus, 1995), there is still a lively debate about its theoretical implications, procedural definition, and to how to operationalize it through survey
data collection and analysis. More research is needed on how transnationalism interacts with migrant integration and/or migrants’ desire to return
to their country of birth. This gap is in part attributed to the amount of
labor requited to obtain rich qualitative and quantitative data for immigrants of different generations in different locations. This articles starts to
fill in this gap.
308
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014
TRANSNATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
3
Transnational Behavior and Socio-economic Status in
the Receiving Society
Few studies address the relationship between integration and transnationalism. Among the classic works that do address this interaction – albeit in
passing – some pose that when faced with low wages, a stigmatized socioeconomic position, and discrimination, immigrants look to their sending
communities for the status that they perceive to be lacking in their host
community (Basch, et al., 1994; Sayad, 2004; R. C. Smith, 2006). On the
other hand, some researchers have used survey data to show that the
more legally, culturally, and socially integrated a migrant is, the more likely
it is that he or she will be able to engage in collective transnational activities (Portes, Escobar, & Arana, 2009; Portes & Rumbaut, 2006).
A study by José Itzigsohn and Silvia Giorguli-Saucedo (2002) is one of
the most cited empirical papers discussing incorporation and transnationalism. Itzigsohn and Giorguli-Saucedo (2002) compared the transnational
participation of Colombians in two New York neighborhoods, with those
of residents in neighborhoods with high concentrations of migrants from
the Dominican Republic in Providence, Rhode Island, and with heavily El
Salvadorian neighborhoods in Los Angeles, California and Washington,
DC. They note the importance of comparative analysis for understanding
incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism arguing that “conclusions and theories derived from the analysis of only one immigrant group
are bound to be limited in their explanatory powers” (Itzigsohn & GiorguliSaucedo, 2002, p. 767). This paper builds on their work by comparing
transnational practices across different sites using the same approach.
Yet, while Itzigsohn and Giorguli-Saucedo compare immigrant groups in
several U.S. cities and concentrate on the first immigrant generation, this
paper extends their analysis by comparing multiple generations of immigrants living in three cities located in two different countries.
Reactive Transnationalism and Resource Based
Transnationalism
We draw from the literature to analyze whether transnationalism – operationalized as remitting, visiting, and wishing to return – is strongest for
those of high socioeconomic status (SES), and for those who are the most
and the least integrated immigrants.
We use Itzigsohn and Giorguli-Saucedo’s (2002) term of “reactive transnationalism” to talk about heavy engagement in transnational activity in
order to ameliorate the discrimination and low social status in the place of
3.1
CASTAÑEDA ET AL.
309
COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES
destination. According to this view, high levels of transnational participation among migrants serve as a palliative and act as an escape from the
effects of low social status in their host society. It is called reactive, because
it is compensatory to social exclusion.
Itzigsohn and Giorguli-Saucedo’s (2002) use the term “Resource Based
Transnationalism” to describe how successful integration and economic
success in the place of destination can also lead to high levels of transnationalism. Biculturalism and other forms of interaction with the countryof-origin can be sources of pride, uniqueness, and increased social status
for successful and structurally integrated immigrants. Under this scenario,
migrants are able to successfully engage with people in their country-oforigin, because of the migrants’ achievements and accumulated resources
(Portes & Rumbaut, 2006). As such, successful immigrants and their progeny have the resources to “maintain a foot in both worlds” and draw from
the benefits of brokering between the two societies (Kasinitz, Mollenkopf,
Waters, & Holdaway, 2008, p. 20).
Reactive transnationalism and resource base transnationalism can also
be considered in terms of associations between transnationalism and integration. For instance, migrant integration is positively correlated to
transnational participation such that the more legally, culturally, economically, and socially integrated a migrant is, the more likely he or she will be
to engage in collective transnational activities (Portes, et al., 2009; Portes &
Rumbaut, 2006), which supports the resource based transnationalism perspective. Yet, transnational activity may also be high when immigrant integration is very low, or when the immigrant is faced with low wages, a
stigmatized socio-economic position, and racialization (Sayad, 2004; R. C.
Smith, 2006). In these situations immigrants may look to the sending communities for the status that they lack in their host community. For example, dark skinned immigrants from the Caribbean may be categorized as
blacks in New York and Boston, but in their country-of-origin their identity
is not determined solely by skin color (Basch, et al., 1994; Levitt, 2001; Roth,
2012).
4
Methods and Data
Data for this study comes from ethno-surveys – which collect quantitative
data, open-ended narratives, and contextual information (Massey, 1987;
Massey & Zenteno, 2000) – conducted in Paris, France (N=65), New York
City, New York, USA (N=363), and El Paso, Texas, USA (N=1038). Ethno310
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014
TRANSNATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
surveys with similar questions were written in English and translated into
Spanish and French. The surveys were conducted by the first author and
trained research teams at different times: Paris (2007-2008), New York City
(2009-2010), and El Paso, Texas (2011-2012). Insights also come from extensive fieldwork conducted by the first author in Paris, New York, El Paso,
and in migrant-sending communities in Mexico, Morocco, and Algeria.
El Paso is a traditional migrant destination, historically a gateway city
for immigrants from Mexico with a considerable population of 3rd and later
immigrant generations. Data for New York is restricted to Latina/o immigrants (mostly Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and Mexicans). In contrast to El
Paso, Mexican migration to New York is much more recent and only got
intensified in the last 30 years (Smith, 2006). Puerto Ricans in the New York
(44) and El Paso (2) samples were included in the analysis as “transnationals” because despite being U.S. citizens from a U.S. territory their movement to and from the island and experiences with social integration in the
mainland U.S. parallel those of other Latina/os.
The comparison is made with North Africans in the Paris metropolitan
area. France was a colonial power in the North African countries of Algeria,
Morocco, and Tunisia; this created early migration flows to Paris (Lucassen, 2005; Sayad, 2006; Silverstein, 2004). Current migration from North
Africa to France has slowed and is mainly driven by family reunification.
In contrast to studies that only survey immigrants who are perceived to
exhibit high levels of transnational behavior due to their membership in
hometown associations or ownership of ethnic businesses, we recruited
respondents from across the metropolitan regions in question in order to
be able to speak about transnational behaviors in and beyond ethnic enclaves (Castañeda, 2012a).
It is extremely difficult to use traditional random sampling strategies to
survey migrants and especially undocumented immigrants, because they
are highly mobile, hidden, and vulnerable populations (Singer, 1999).
Therefore we used purposeful sampling techniques (Neuman, 2011). In
particular, we sampled with the following considerations in mind, a) heterogeneity of respondents (different ages, professions, education levels,
and immigrant generational statuses), b) representation of all main geographic areas in the cities and towns studied (Castañeda, 2012a), and c)
saturation of responses, stopping when new answers continued to echo
previous ones (See table 1). Surveys were conducted face to face.
CASTAÑEDA ET AL.
311
COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES
Table 1
Sample Descriptive Statistics
Mean Age
(Std. Dev.)
Percent Female
Percent Latinos
Percent North African
Percent Undocumented Migrants
Years of Education Mean
(Std. Dev.)
Sample Size
El Paso
36.42
(15.57)
54.2
100
0
6.4
12.54
(3.62)
1038
NYC
32.63
(11.68)
51.2
100
0
18.9
13.56
(3.24)
363
Paris
32.18
(12.41)
24.6
0
100
0
13.37
(3.29)
65
4.1
Operationalization of Variables and Data Analysis
The dependent variables are indicators of transnationalism based on the
following questions:
Do you go back to visit your town/city of birth [or that of your parents]?
(1= yes, 0 = no);
Do you send money back to your town/city of birth [or that of your
parents]? (1= yes, 0 = no);
Do you plan to move back to your town/city of birth [or that of your
parents]? (1= yes, 0 = no);
Do you think your life is better as a result of migrating? (1= yes, 0 = no).
The survey data was entered and analyzed with the SPSS 21 statistical
package. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to examine
the research objectives. Data was analyzed for each location individually,
because different sample sizes and frames impede the usage of statistical
tests to compare across locations. The statistics are provided for descriptive
analysis and theory making. The specific quantitative results are not meant
to be generalizable to the whole immigrant and ethnic population of the city
in question. Therefore the small samples and differences in sample size do
not affect the descriptive analyses and the hypothesis advanced.
A primary independent variable is immigrant generation. We define the
first generation as those born abroad and immigrating after 16 years of age.
We define the 1.5 generation as those who migrated before the age of 16.
The second immigrant generation is defined as those born in the country
of residence with at least one parent born abroad. We define the third
generation as when some or all grandparents were born abroad. The second and third generation individuals are citizens of the respective countries in which they reside given that both the U.S. and France have established jus soli laws (Brubaker, 1992; Weil, 2005).
312
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014
TRANSNATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
The second independent variable is socio-economic status. This variable
was created to assess the resource-based transnationalism hypothesis. We
divided our samples into low, medium, and high Socio-Economic Status
(SES). In El Paso, SES is an index measure consisting of occupation, years of
education, and yearly household income (low = less than $30,000; middle =
$30,001-$60,000; and high = more than $60,001; all figures in U.S. dollars). In
New York and Paris, SES is an index consisting of occupation and years of
education. The operationalization of SES as low, medium, and high in
these locations was also informed by ethnographic data that helped to
contextualized how SES or class is conceptualized differently across locations. To code the SES variable, members of the research team with at least
one year of field experience in each location determined the cutoffs for
low, medium, and high SES. We used inter-coder reliability methods to
assess the coding consistency. Initially each coder categorized cases independently; then, the coders met to compare codes and agreed on a code in
case of disagreement. Given that SES is relational and thus varies across
locations, we believe that this qualitative assessment is an improvement to
pure self-report or a quantitative measure based on only one dimension.
Asking people of Algerian-origin in Paris if they plan to go back to live in
Algeria is a very sensitive topic, given that many French people often ask
them the question rhetorically as a push out of the country. I often heard
French individuals asking “Why do Algerians migrate to France if they
wanted Algeria to become independent from France?” Thus the direct question about return was taken out of the ethno-surveys conducted in Paris.
While this question was not asked directly of North Africans, interviewees
were asked if they would like to live in another country if they could, and
they were also asked how their lives would be different if they lived in the
country-of-origin. Those who answered that they wished they could live in
their country-of-origin or their family’s ancestral home, and those who explicitly brought up return migration, were coded as wishing to return. We
were able to capture the desire to return in this manner, but we suspect that
this may have resulted in an underestimation of the wish to return among
North Africans in France.
5
Multi-sited Comparisons of Transnational Behavior
By comparing immigrant integration patterns and transnational behavior
in different receiving cities and countries, interesting patterns appear.
Figure 2 illustrates a summary of the transnational behaviors in all three
CASTAÑEDA ET AL.
313
COMPARATIVE MIGRATION STUDIES
locations. The sample of residents of North African origin living in Paris
demonstrated the highest percentage of people visiting the country-oforigin and desiring to return. The percentage of those remitting is slightly
higher for New York than Paris, and much lower in El Paso.
Latina/os in El Paso experience transnationalism somewhat differently
than the respondents in the other locations. They are less likely to visit
their place-of-origin, less likely to remit, and much less likely to wish to
return. These outcomes point to the role of geographic proximity in shaping transnationalism. People residing in El Paso can visit Ciudad Juárez,
Mexico with relative ease (if they have proper documentation). Additionally, it is possible that respondents remit money through Mexican channels
or via the visitation of people from Ciudad Juárez and Northern Mexico.
We will elaborate more on this issue below.
The transnational behavior of El Paso residents also varies in terms of
visitation to the place-of-origin. We suspect that for many immigrants
from other parts of Mexico visiting Ciudad Juárez may be enough to take
what Robert Smith (2006) calls “a long drink of mexicanidad.” El Paso itself
may also fill the need to connect with Mexican culture. El Paso is 83
percent Latina/o, mostly Mexican, with the majority of the population
speaking Spanish and embracing Mexican culture. Therefore, residing in
El Paso can diminish the nostalgic elements Mexican immigrants usually
have, which reduces the need to return to the home country except for
family visits and functions. Border dynamics both distance and connect
U.S. residents to and from Mexico (Heyman, 2012; Vila, 2000).
In the following graph we provide a summary of transnationalism practices such as visits, remittances, and desire to return.
100
90
87,7
80
70
62,7
60
50
47,7
43,5
48,6
53,3
Visits
42,6
Remittances
40
Return
30
20
12,7 13,7
10
0
Paris
New York
El Paso
Figure 2 Percent Remittances, Visits, and Wish to Return Paris, New York, El Paso
314
VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2014
TRANSNATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
Figure 2 shows the percentage of respondents who sent remittances or
visited their hometown or ancestors’ place-of-origin for all SES and immigrant generations.
6
Socioeconomic Status and Tendency to Visit, Remit,
and Desire to Return to Hometown or Ancestral Placeof-origin
6.1
Remittances and SES
Table 3
Percent Remittances by SES, El Paso, New York, Paris
El Paso
Low
Medium
High
Total
NYC
Low
Medium
High
Total
Paris
Low
Medium
High
Total
* p.