1
7
Software Development Methodologies
Name of Student
University Name
Course
Professor
Date
Agile and Waterfall Methodologies
This paper analyzes and contrasts the Agile and Waterfall software development methodologies (Gechman, 2019).
Waterfall |
Agile |
Generally speaking, the software development process is separated into several parts. |
Sprints are used to divide the project development lifecycle into manageable chunks. |
The sequential design process known as the Waterfall approach is described here. |
A gradual strategy is used throughout. |
This methodology may turn out to be quite rigid at times due to the fact that it is structured |
The agile technique is characterized by its adaptability. |
The software development project will be completed as a single unit of work. |
Agile can be thought of as a collection of many diverse projects working together as a whole. |
It is impossible to make changes to the requirements after the project development process has begun. |
In comparison to other methods, Agile is highly flexible, allowing for modifications in the project development requirements even after the initial planning has been finished. |
The Waterfall approach requires that all project development phases, such as designing, developing, testing, and so on, be completed only once. |
Agile methodologies employ an iterative development approach (Shaydulin & Sybrandt,2017). |
During the testing phase, the test plan is only infrequently mentioned. |
After each sprint, the test plan is evaluated. |
The process is always easy when using the waterfall technique, which means that the project manager is required at every stage of the software development life cycle. |
Because the Agile Team members are interchangeable, they can complete their tasks more quickly. Additionally, there is no requirement for project managers because the entire team controls the projects. |
Risk can be reduced |
The agile technique performs particularly effectively when time and materials are used or when money is not fixed. However, it has the potential to cause stress in fixed-price circumstances. |
This model demonstrates a project mindset by focusing solely on completing the project in front of them. |
A product mindset is introduced by Agile software development, in which the software product fulfills the needs of its end consumers and evolves itself in response to those needs (Shaydulin & Sybrandt,2017). |
The strategy is particularly well suited to projects with clearly defined requirements and changes that are not anticipated. |
Agile development is a technique in which it is believed that requirements may change and evolve. |
The “Testing” step is the second phase, following the “Build” phase. |
Testing is carried out in parallel with software development when using the Agile methodology. |
Business analysis is preparing requirements before the start of a project. |
Almost every day during a project, the product owner and team prepare requirements (Shaydulin & Sybrandt,2017). |
References
Gechman, M. (2019). Software development methodologies. Project Management of Large Software-Intensive Systems, 49-66. doi:10.1201/9780429027932-4
Shaydulin, R., & Sybrandt, J. (2017). To agile, or not to agile: A comparison of software development methodologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07469.