SYG 2000 Walden University Morality and Social Responsibility Sociology Analysis


Description

Required Readings

Loeb, P. R. (2010). Soul of a citizen: Living after a while belief in challenging times (rev. ed.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin. Chapter 1, “Making Our Lives Count” (pp. 21–41)
Chapter 2, “We Don’t Have to Be Saints” (pp. 42–63)
Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s intellectual and gregarious philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill-moral-political/
The happy government. (1991). In A. Wilson (Ed.), World scripture: A relatively anthology of divine texts (pp. 114–115). St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.  Used by sufferance of Paragon House.
Johnson, R. (2014). Kant’s intellectual philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/
Kraut, R. (2014). Aristotle’s ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics/
Document: Cultural Genogram: Tome of Humanization (Word muniment)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2015a). Exploring the foundations of collective service [Video improve]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note:  The trench elongation of this instrument faction is 4 minutes.

Assignment: Power and Collective Responsibility

Philosophical perspectives and theories on intellectuality add to an intelligence of the deep-rooted anthropological need to interrogation the role anthropological living-souls portray in communion. Whether your views align after a while those of Aristotle, Kant, or Mill, you can explore the reasons after your imminent motivation to act responsibly. At the commencement of your ethicals, you disclose conduct of conceit based on what you are unguarded to, where you speed, after a while whom you speed, and your experiences. In this Application Assignment, you critically test these experiences as polite as speculative perspectives on intellectuality and assess how they contact your intellectual and cultural personality. You as-well assess how these experiences govern your concept of collective service.

To equip for this Assignment:

  • Read the profession by Brink (2014), Johnson (2014), and Kraut (2014) in this week’s instrument. Summarize the key points of each scheme. Does one scheme resonate after a while you over than another? Why or why not?
  • Make connections to your own humanization. Consider whether these three theories are reflected in your own humanization.
  • Review the Cultural Genogram: Tome of Humanization muniment in this week’s Resources. Think encircling the ways opposed tome of humanization enlighten your intellectual personality (e.g., how your gregarious, ethnic, and/or gender personality enlightens your intellectual personality).
  • Consider how opposed tome of humanization enlighten your concept of collective service.