This is hard and I don’t understanding it.
IHP 430 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric
Utilizing evidence-based literature and quality standards, propose an initiative that addresses your problem selected in Milestone One. If you chose a problem in
your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain
database with instructor permission. You will also implement your performance improvement initiative and discuss what success of the performance
improvement plan will look like after implementation. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and
include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this final part of the assignment, consider the following
prompts to formulate your paper.
III. Performance Improvement Initiative
A. Propose an initiative that will address this problem within the department of your chosen healthcare organization. What specific relevant quality
standard will this quality initiative address?
B. Discuss the data determinants of success, as related to this initiative. In other words, what type of data will be indicative of a quality outcome?
IV. Implementation of the Plan in the Organization
A. What interdepartmental communication channels will be used for plan implementation?
B. What manner of data interpretation will be used to communicate the findings within the organization?
C. If this initiative was implemented, what do you believe would be the hypothetical effect(s) on patient care outcomes? How will health
information systems support those improvements in patient care?
D. What do you think the hypothetical effect of the quality or performance initiative will be on the culture of safety within the organization?
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be two to five pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list
and all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Performance:
Propose
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
proposal demonstrates a
nuanced insight into the
relationship between the
planned initiative and the quality
standard being addressed
Proposes an initiative to address
the chosen problem, including
the quality standard being
addressed
Proposes an initiative to address
the chosen problem but
proposal has gaps in detail or
logic
Does not propose an initiative
15
Performance:
Discuss
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
chosen data determinants of
success demonstrate great
insight into the type of data that
will be indicative of a quality
outcome
Accurately discusses the data
determinants of success related
to this initiative
Discusses the data determinants
of success related to this
initiative but discussion is
inaccurate
Does not discuss the data
determinants of success related
to this initiative
15
Implementation:
Communication
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description is exceptionally clear
in the delineation of
communication channels
Thoroughly describes the
interdepartmental
communication channels to be
used for plan implementation
Describes the communication
channels to be used for plan
implementation but channels
are not interdepartmental or
description has gaps in detail
Does not describe the
communication channels to be
used for plan implementation
15
Implementation:
Data
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
choices of data interpretation
demonstrate nuanced insight
into communication within the
chosen healthcare organization
Accurately describes the manner
of data interpretation that will
be used to communicate
findings within the organization
Describes the manner of data
interpretation that will be used
to communicate findings within
the organization but description
is inaccurate
Does not describe the manner of
data interpretation that will be
used to communicate findings
within the organization
15
Implementation:
Initiative
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers reasoning concerning the
hypothetical effects of the
initiative on patient care
outcomes
Comprehensively describes the
hypothetical effects of this
initiative on patient care
outcomes, including how health
information systems support
improvements in patient care
Describes the hypothetical
effects of this initiative on
patient care outcomes but
description is cursory
Does not describe the
hypothetical effects of the
initiative on patient care
outcomes
15
Implementation:
Effect
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers reasoning concerning the
hypothetical effect of the quality
initiative on the culture of safety
within the organization
Comprehensively describes the
hypothetical effect of the quality
initiative on the culture of safety
within the organization
Describes the hypothetical effect
of the quality initiative on the
culture of safety within the
organization but description is
cursory
Does not describe the
hypothetical effect of the quality
initiative on the culture of safety
within the organization
15
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, and syntax and is
presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that
negatively impact readability
and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%