Please figure this out
IHP 430 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Begin by identifying an organizational problem within your own workplace healthcare setting or a hypothetical healthcare organization. If you choose a problem
in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public
domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include
peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this first part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to
formulate your paper.
I. What Is the Organizational Problem?
A. Provide a contextual basis for the organizational problem that you have chosen. How does this problem fail to meet quality or other regulatory
requirements?
B. Articulate organizational challenges posed by the problem (e.g., interdepartmental conflicts, communication failure, budgeting issues).
II. Evidence-Based Support
A. Provide data that supports the existence of the problem. You may utilize public sources to find data related to your selected problem.
B. How has this problem been addressed in the past? What information management systems or patient care technologies have been utilized when
addressing this problem? Be sure to use peer-reviewed literature to support your answer.
C. Discuss relevant accreditation standards, safety standards, compliance standards, and quality initiatives. How do these standards promote a
culture of safety within the department? Be sure to cite the appropriate standards within your answer.
Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list
and all internal citations.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Problem: Provide Meets “Proficient” criteria and
includes insightful detail into the
contextual basis of the
organizational problem
Comprehensively provides a
contextual basis for the
organizational problem that was
chosen, including how the
problem fails to meet quality or
regulatory requirements
Provides a contextual basis for
the organizational problem that
was chosen but with gaps in
detail or logic
Does not provide a contextual
basis for the organizational
problem that was chosen
18
Problem:
Articulate
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers greater depth of
information regarding the
organizational challenges posed
by the problem
Clearly articulates organizational
challenges posed by the problem
Articulates organizational
challenges posed by the problem
but articulation is not clear
Does not articulate
organizational challenges posed
by the problem
18
Support: Provide Meets “Proficient” criteria and
data provided demonstrates
nuanced understanding of the
problem
Provides data that supports the
existence of the problem
Provides data but data does not
fully support existence of the
problem
Does not provide data or data
provided does not support
existence of the problem
18
Support:
Addressed
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
description includes insightful
detail regarding how this
problem has been addressed in
the past
Thoroughly describes how this
problem has been addressed in
the past, including the
information management
systems or patient care
technologies utilized, and
supports answer with peer-
reviewed literature
Describes how this problem has
been addressed in the past, but
with gaps in detail, and supports
answer but support does not
include peer-reviewed literature
or is irrelevant
Does not describe how the
problem has been addressed in
the past or does not support
answer
18
Support: Discuss Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers professional insights
concerning how accreditation,
safety, compliance, and quality
standards promote a culture of
safety
Clearly discusses relevant
accreditation, safety, and
compliance standards, as well as
quality initiatives, including how
these standards promote a
culture of safety within the
department, and cites
appropriate standards
Discusses accreditation, safety,
and compliance standards, as
well as quality initiatives, but
with gaps in detail or clarity, and
cites standards but citations are
irrelevant or inappropriate
Does not discuss accreditation,
safety, compliance, and quality
standards and does not cite
standards
18
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, and syntax and is
presented in a professional and
easy-to-read format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that negatively
impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, or syntax that prevent
understanding of ideas
10
Earned Total 100%
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
