Investments for Future:
Early Childhood Development and


Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay


Investments relevant to the first years of life are directly connected to the future of

societies. It can be argued that investments for early childhood development and

education are one of the best ways of decreasing social inequality caused by adver-

se environments which hinder development in early ages and tackling poverty by re-

ducing the rate of infant and child deaths, increasing the attendance rate to school,

decreasing the rate of failure and drop-out rates in schools and the percentage of cri-

me rates. In this article, the effects of alternative early childhood education programs

on children and their parents were investigated. These programs were developed as

an alternative to institutional programs, had lesser costs, intended to support chil-

dren who carried developmental risks by providing them with education, health, and

nutrition/nourishment. These programs were supported by the World Bank in deve-

loping countries.

Key Words

Early childhood Development and Education, Early Childhood Education Prog-

rams end Effects, Dealing with Impoverishment, Social Improvement.

© 2007 E¤itim Dan›flmanl›¤› ve Araflt›rmalar› ‹letiflim Hizmetleri Tic. Ltd. fiti.

* Correspondence: Hülya KARTAL, University of Uludag, Faculty of Education Department of Ele-
mentary Education 16090 Görükle, Bursa- Turkey. E-mail:

Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice

7 (1) • January 2007 • 543-554

Human wealth education can be seen as an investment for the for-
mation of personality. It is also described as a process of forming in-
tended behaviors, a crucial factor for the national economy and so-
cial development.

When the “Education for all Committee” met in Amman in 1996,

it was stated that formal education age was too late for a child to

start education. Basic education must begin with birth because le-
arning in early ages forms the basis of learning in later years. Majo


developmental theories indicate that a child completes a great deal

of her/his development until s/he begins school. So formal educati-
on age is too late to deal with the learning needs of children; con-
sequently, early childhood care and developmental programs have

to be focused on.

Many studies in recent years showed that being well nourished, he-
althy, and cared for in her/his early ages of life are very important

for a child’s physical, mental, and social development. As a result of

better school performance, fewer criminal behaviors, better health

care, proper nourishment, and proper environments, there is a grea-
ter possibility of raising more socially harmonious people.

Early childhood development and education services are interven-
tions that aim to support 0-8 aged children’s development (i.e., cog-
nitive, physical, emotional, and social), provide them with healthy

and adequate development, protect, give learning opportunities,

develop their own self-sufficiency, and help them in interactions

with society in which they live. On the other hand, such programs

also aim at informing parents about relevant new knowledge and

skills about child care, development, and education.

The services mentioned are conducted by early childhood care and

educational institutions that serve in different ways such as day ca-
re centers, kindergartens, or primary schools as full or prime time

programs in many countries. When the early intervention programs

are examined, it is observed that these programs are generally ba-
sed on home visits, institution-centered early childhood programs,

institution-centered programs in primary school structure, child-pa-
rent centered programs, and health care services.

When the results related to studies carried out to determine the ef-
fects of early childhood programs, the effects of these programs on


children and parents can be summarized as in the following:

Programs have many positive effects on children’s cognitive deve-
lopment and school achievement, learning motivation in the sense

of social and emotional sufficiency; reduce in children’s behaviors

toward crime and percentage of arrestment; care for children’s nut-
rition and increase their immunity level.

Programs also have positive effects on decrease of the percentage of

mothers’ pregnancy and mothers’ positive attitude towards preg-
nancy; increase in the quality of mother-child interaction and dec-
rease in percentage of mothers’ maltreatment of children; increase

in mothers’ completion of their education and graduation from high

school; increase in percentage of mothers that have a job and dec-
rease in percentage of mothers’ behavioral disorder-directed crime

and addiction of alcohol and drug.

On the other hand, when the effects of the program which parents

participated were examined, it was established that family partici-
pation had a very important effect on child’s academic achieve-
ment. When children whose families attended these kinds of prog-
rams compared with the children whose families didn’t attend any

program, there was a significant difference between the groups in

favor of first group in respect of school achievement, children’s mo-
re regular school attendance, higher percentages of graduation fro


high school and higher rate of university education. It was also ob-
served that families that participated in these programs encouraged

their children to continue higher education and cooperate more

with their children’s teachers and give more support in solving

school problems.

Programs have positive effects on cognitive development of chil-
dren that have disadvantages in respect of socio-economic level and

have positive effects in reducing the inequality based on gender

among these children. Also programs that focus on language deve-
lopment affect these children’s school achievement in a positive


There are also long-term effects of the programs such as decline in

rate of quitting the job and not taking the job seriously, increase in

level of income and high preference to work independently.

KARTAL / Investments for Future: Early Childhood Development and Education • 545

One of the best indicators of short and long-term effects of early

childhood development and education programs is the difference

between demographic characteristics of the G8 countries (i.e.,

France, Canada, Italy, Japan, Germany, England, the U.S.A. and

Russia) and developing countries. When table-1 is examined, it is

seen that while infant mortality rate in the G8 countries does not

exceed 1%, this rate increases to 7% in India. India is one of deve-
loping countries while GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita in

G8 average 25.000 US$ (except Russia), this amount decreases to

2.497 US$ in developing countries. Another important data is that

the rate of children that do not attend school despite being in scho-
ol age, is 14% in Turkey, while this rate is 17% in Germany. Howe-
ver, there is about by half (28% / 51%) difference between rates of

children that continue high school in the same two countries.

Data clearly demonstrate that investments made for early years of

the life are made for the future of societies. So, the educational le-
vel of a society and the level of welfare also increase. In this con-
text, early childhood educational programs have been supported by

the World Bank in developing countries. These programs have fe-
wer costs and developed for children who face developmental risks,

education, health, nutrition and nourishment needs. The effects of

these programs on children and their parents have been assessed.

Results of the studies conducted in Bolivia (Bolivia Integrated
Child Development Program (Proyecto Integral de Desarrollo Infan-
til, PIDI), Brazil (Criança Maravilhosa and Alimentaçao de Pre-es-
colar (PROAPE), Colombia (Bogotá Study of Malnutrition, Diarr-
heal Disease and Child Development, Home-Based Community Day
Care), India (Early Childhood Education Project (ECE), Jamaic


(Nutritional Supplementation and Psychosocial Stimulation Combi-
ned) and Turkey (The Early Enrichment Project) verify the positi-
ve effects of these programs on the child and the family. Applicati-
on of these programs particularly to poor families and their children

are crucially significant in the sense that families become more

awareness of the importance of education and these programs help

to reduce or even eradicate the differences likely to be caused by

socioeconomic reasons, that is social inequalities to be experienced

by those children when they start school.

The relationship between human development and economic


growth also attaches more significance to the early childhood edu-
cation that directly affects human development. As a result, the sig-
nificance of early childhood education has been gradually increa-
sing on the international arena. The United Nations and the World

Bank attach increasing significance to early childhood development

education on the basis of human development and provide financi-
al resources (Bekman, & Gürlesel, 2005). The expansion of servi-
ces of early childhood education (ece) and preschool education to

the all sections of community is one of the targets of social develop-
ment today. However, the high cost of those services prevents the

neediest children of low-income families from benefiting from this

service. Thanks to initiatives of both universities and non-govern-
mental organizations in the recent years in our country that some

models have been developed aiming to support especially children

and their families facing the risk of development (Anne-Çocuk

E¤itim Program›, Aile-Çocuk E¤itim Program›, KEDV’n›n Kad›n

ve Çocuk Merkezleri, Milli E¤itim Bakanl›¤› K›z Teknik Ö¤retim

Genel Müdürlü¤ü Anne-Baba-Çocuk E¤itimi Projesi, Ana-Baba

Okulu, Baba Destek Program›, Güneydo¤u Anadolu Bölgesi’nde

Bir Erken Müdahale Modeli: Yaz Anaokulu Pilot Uygulamas›, Çok

Amaçl› Okulöncesi E¤itim Merkezi, Gezici Anaokulu Projesi,

AÇEV-TRT Televizyon Yoluyla E¤itim Projesi). The fact that the

rate of schooling among preschool children is only 16% reveals that

those models have to be urgently made more widespread all over

the country. When the existing applications and other applications

in our country are compared, it is clearly observed that there exist

some deficiencies. The most serious of those deficiencies is that

preschool education is mostly oriented to 5-6 year-old children. Ho-
wever, the results of studies have shown that the “interventions” or

“preventive” programs implemented within the framework of ece

have more lasting effects on both children and mothers. In this re-
gard, the applications in our country are crucially significant in or-
der to provide early support to those children and their families fa-
cing the risk of development. Within the framework of a program,

if those applications are commenced at the early stages of preg-
nancy during which the effects of prospective mothers on the de-
velopment of the baby in the antenatal period, and if the nutriti-
on and welfare of the infant, the significance of the infants first ye-

KARTAL / Investments for Future: Early Childhood Development and Education • 547

ars and the support and guidance for parental skills are well explai-
ned and provided, developmental defects and problems will be re-
duced and the prospective mothers will be made more conscious of

child development. On the other hand, the intervention program

should not only support the development of children, but also pro-
vide opportunities for mothers so that they can improve themselves

within their own capacities. There is no doubt that all these can be

accomplished through steps to be taken in restructuring in the pub-
lic policies on this matter and increasing the one-per thousand sha-
re of the cost of preschool education in the general budget.

In conclusion, as was seen in effects of programs mentioned in this

study, it can be said that investments for early childhood develop-
ment and education are one of the best way of decreasing the rate

infant and child deaths, increasing the time spent at school, decrea-
sing the rate of class repetition, dropping out school and delinqu-
ency and finally decreasing social inequality caused by adverse en-
vironments which hinder development in early ages and tackling

poverty. But despite all these efforts, in a world in which the ave-
rage of rate of children who continue their education up to fifth gra-
de is below 75%, it can be said that there is a long way to go.


Kaynakça / References
Aksu-Koç, A. & Erguvanl›-Taylan, E., Bekman, S. (2002). Türkiye’de okulöncesi e¤i-
timi: Hizmete duyulan ihtiyaçlar›n saptanmas› ve çocu¤un dil yetisi düzeyinin de¤er-
lendirilmesi araflt›rma raporu. Bo¤aziçi Üniversitesi Araflt›rma Fonu (Proje no: 00 R
101) ve Anne Çocuk E¤itim Vakf›. 24 May›s 2005 tarihinde, adresinden edinilmifltir.

Akyol, T. (2006, 28 Mart). E¤itimde tutuculuk ve reform. Milliyet Gazetesi.

Balachander, K. (1999). World bank support for early childhood development: Case

studies from Kenya, India, and the Philippines. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 20 (1),

Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive

and school outcomes, The Future of Children, 5 (3), 25-50.

Barnett, W. S. (1998). Long-term cognitive and academic effects of early childhood

education on children in poverty. Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 204-207.

Barnett, W. S., & Hustedt, J. T. (2003). Preschool the most important grade, The First
Years of School, ASCD for the Success of Each Learner, Publications Educational
Leadership, 60 (7), 54-57.

Behrman, J. R., Cheng, Y., & Todd, P. (2000). The impact of the Bolivian integrated
“PIDI” preschool program. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved No-
vember 12, 2004, from

Bekman, S. (2003). Türkiye’deki erken çocukluk e¤itimi sistemi ve erken çocukluk e¤i-
timinde farkl› modeller. Erken Çocukluk E¤itimi Politikalar›: Yayg›nlaflma, Yöneti-
flim ve Yap›lar Toplant›s› Raporu, Ankara. 8 May›s 2004 tarihinde adresinden indirilmifltir.

Bekman, S. & Gürlesel, C. F. (2005). Do¤ru bafllangiç: Türkiye’de okulöncesi e¤i-
tim: Özet bulgular. TÜS‹AD Bas›n Bülteni. 4 Temmuz 2005 tarihinde . adresinden edinilmifltir.

Berrueta-Clement, J., Barnett, W., Schweinhart, L., Epstein, A., & Weikart, D.

(1984). Changed lives:The effects of the perry preschool project on youths through age 19.
Ypsilanti, MI: Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.

Boocock, S. S. (1995). Early childhood programs in other nations: Goals and outco-
mes. The Future of Children, 5 (3), 94-114.

Boocock, S. S. (2001). Brazil – early child development: A focus on the impact of presc-
hools. Document Type: Sector Report. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www- .

Bredekamp, S., Knuth, R.A., & Shulman, L.G. (1992). What does research say about
early childhood education? North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
(NCREL) Oak Brook. Retrieved October 28, 2004, from

Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectu-
al and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income fami-
lies. Child Development, 65, 684-698.

Castillo Cordona, C., Ortiz Pinilla, N., & González Rossetti, A. (1993). Home-Based
community day care and children’s rights: The Colombian case. UNICEF Internatio-
nal Child Development Centre: Innocenti Occasional Papers, Child Rights Series

KARTAL / Investments for Future: Early Childhood Development and Education • 549

nr.3, The Consultative Group on Early Childhood Care & Development (ecdgroup).

Retrieved October 20, 2004, from
ad/vc1hcdcl .

Cotton, K., & Conklin, N. F. (1989). Research on early childhood education. Nort-
hwest Regional Educational Laboratory, School Improvement Research Series

(SIRS). Retrieved September 18, 2005, from

Cotton, K., & Wikelund, K. R. (1989). Parent involvement in education, Northwest
Regional Educaitonal Laboratory, School Improvement Research Series (SIRS


Retrieved September 18, 2005, from http://www.nwrel.oorg/scpd/sirs/3/cu.

Currie, J. M., & Thomas, D. (1995). Does head start make a difference? The Ameri-
can Economic Review, 85, 341-364.

Currie, J. (Spring, 2001). Early childhood education programs, The Journal of Econo-
mic Perspectives,15 (2), 213-238.

Del Rosso, J., & Marek, T. (1996). Class Action: Improving school performance in the
developing world through better health and nutrition. Directions in development.
World Bank, Washington D.C. Retrieved December 24, 2004, from .

Del Rosso, J., & Marek, T. (2005). Dünya çocuklar›n›n durumu. Retrieved Novem-
ber 08, 2005, from .

Entwisle, D.R. (1995). The role of schools in sustaining early childhood program be-
nefits. The Future of Children, 5 (3), 133-144.

Gomby, D. S., Larson, C. S., Lewit, E. M., & Behrman, R. E. (1993). Home visi-
ting: analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 3 (3), 8-24.

Grantham-McGregor, S. M., Powell, C. A., Walker, S. P., & Himes, J. H. (1991).

Nutritional, supplementation, psychological stimulation and mental development of

stunted children: The Jamaican study. The Lancet, 338 (8758), 1-5.

Houlares, J. & Oden, S. A. (1990). Follow-up study of head start’s role in the lives of
children and families. Interim report. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Rese-
arch Foundation.

Howes, C. (1990). Can the age of entry into child care and the quality of child care

predict adjustment in kindergarten? Developmental Psychology, 26, 292-303.

Jamison, D. T., (1986). Child malnutrition and school performance in China. Jour-
nal of Development Economics, 20 (2), 299-309.

Ka¤›tç›bafl›, Ç., Sunar, D., & Bekman, S. (1993). Long-term effects of early ›nterven-
tion. Unpublished paper, Department of Education, Bogazici University, ‹stanbul.
Retrieved December 24, 2004, from

Ka¤›tç›bafl›, Ç. (1996). Family and human development across cultures: A view from
the other side. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved December 24,
2004, from

Ka¤›tç›bafl›, Ç., Sunar, D., Bekman, S., & Cemalc›lar, Z. (2004). Erken müdahalenin
eriflkinlikte süren etkileri: Erken Destek Projesi’nin ikinci takip araflt›rmas›’n›n ön bul-
gular›. Anne-Çocuk E¤itim Vakf› Araflt›rma Raporu. 18 May›s 2005 tarihinde adresinden edinilmifltir.


Kaytaz, M. (2004). Türkiye’de okulöncesi e¤itimin fayda-maliyet analizi. Araflt›rma
Raporu. Anne-Çocuk E¤itim Vakf›. 18 May›s 2005 tarihinde adresinden edinilmifltir.

Kaul, V., Ramachandran, C., & Upadhyaya, G. C. (1993). Impact of early childhood
education on retention in primary grades: A longitudinal study. New Delhi: The Na-
tional Council of Educational Research and Training. Integrated Child Development

Services (ICDS). Retrieved December 24, 2004, from

Kitzman, H.; Olds, D. L.; Henderson, C. R., Hanks, Jr. C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R.

et al. (1997). Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy

outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing: A randomized controlled

trial. JAMA:The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 644-652.

Lasky, R. E., Klein, R. E., Yarbrough, C., Engle, P. L., Lechtig, A., & Martorell, R.

(1981). The relationship between physical growth and infant behavioral develop-
ment in rural guatemala. Child Development, 52, 219-226.

Love, J. M., Kisker, E. E., Ross, C. M., Schochet, P. Z., Brooks-Gunn, J., Paulsell, D.

et al. (2002). Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their famili-
es: The impacts of Early Head Start. Executive summary. Washington, DC: Adminis-
tration on Children, Youth, and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services, Mathematica Policy Research

2005, from http://www.mathematica-

Lunenburg, F. C. (2000, Spring). Early childhood education programs can make a dif-
ference in academic, economic and social arenas (Vol. 120). Copyright Project Inno-
vation, Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. Retrieved Feb-
ruary 17, 2005, from

McKey, R. H., Condelli, L., Ganson, H., Barrett, B. J., McConkey, C., & Plantz, M.

C. (1985). The impact of Head Start on children, families and communities. In Fi-
nal report of the head start evaluation, synthesis, and utilization project (pp.34-57).
Washington, DC: CSR Incorporated for the Head Start Bureau, Administration for

Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Montessori, M. (1997). Çocuk e¤itimi / Montessori metodu (çev. Güler Yücel). ‹stan-
bul: Özgür Yay›nlar›.

Morrison, G. S. (1991). Early childhood education today (5th ed.). New York: Max-
well Macmillan.

Myers, R. (1995). Erken çocukluk programlar›n›n gelifltirilmesinde temel unsurlar

ve politikalar. Erken Çocukluk E¤itiminin Önemi Sempozyum Raporu içinde (s.
60-78). ‹stanbul: Anne-Çocuk E¤itim Vakf›.

Oktay, A. (2002). Yaflam›n sihirli y›llar›: Okulöncesi dönem. ‹stanbul: Epsilon Yay›n-

Olds, D.L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Cole., R., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D.,

Pettitt, L. et al. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life cour-
se, child abuse and neglect, and children’s arrests: Fifteen year follow-up of a rando-
mized trial. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 637-643.

Ömero¤lu, E. (2002, 23 Ekim). Mutluluk için erken e¤itim. Radikal Gazetesi.

Ömero¤lu, E. & Can Yaflar, M. (2002). Ev merkezli aile-çocuk e¤itim program›’n›n

ev ortam›na etkisi. Erken Çocukluk E¤itimi ve Geliflimi Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitab›
içinde (s.34-51). Ankara: Kök Yay›nlar›.

KARTAL / Investments for Future: Early Childhood Development and Education • 551

Paes de Barros, R., & Mendonça, R. (1999). Costs and benefits of pre-school education
in Brazil. Rio de Janerio: Institute of Applied Economic Research. Retrieved De-
cember 24, 2004, from

Perloff, L., Butler, P., Berry, C., & Budetti, P. (1998). Literature rewiev of outcomes
of early intervention programs, Pediatric Developmental Services Program prepared
for The Commonwealth Fund by The Institue for Health Services Research and

Policy Studies Northwestern University. Retrieved June 19, 2004, from

Powell, C. A., & Graham-McGregor, S. M. (1985). The ecology of nutritional status

and development in young children in Kingston, Jamaica. American Journal Clini-
cal Nutrition, 41 (6), 1322-1331.

Powell, C. (1999). Overview of early child-care and education programmes and Ja-
maican case studies. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 20 (1), 108-120. Retrieved Janu-
ary 22, 2004, from

Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term

effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile

arrest: A 15-year follow up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 285, 2339-2347.

Reynolds, A.J. and Wolfe, B., (1997). School achievement, early intervention and spe-
cial education: New evidence from the Chicago longitudinal study. Focus: University
of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty, Heartland Institute,

Vol.19, Number:1, Summer/Fall. Retrieved December 8, 2003, from http://www.he-

Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The
high/scope perry preschool study through age 27. Monograph of the High/Scope Edu-
cational Research Foundation, 10. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

Seitz, V., & Apfel, N. (1994). Parent-focused intervention: Diffusion effects on sib-
lings. Child Development, 65, 677-683.

Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2001). Focus on mathematic achievement: Effects of
family and community involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA. Retrieved May 24, 2004 ,from

Senemo¤lu, N. & Genç, fi. (2001). ‹lkö¤retimde etkili ö¤retme ve ö¤renme ö¤retmen
el kitab›. Modül 12, Millî E¤itim Bakanl›¤› Web Sitesi. 5 Haziran 2005 tarihinde adresinden edinilmifltir.

Smith, B. J., & Fox, L. (2003). Systems of service delivery: A synthesis of evidence rele-
vant to young children at risk of or who have challenging behavior. Funded by the Of-
fice of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, Center for Evi-
dence-Bades Practice, Young Children with Challenging Behavior. Retrieved Feb-
ruary 18, 2005, from

jan03 .

Spiess, C. K., Büchel, F., & Gagner, G. G. (2003). Children’s school placement in

Germany: Does kindergarten attendance matter? Early Childhood Research Quar-
terly, 18, 255-270.

St.Pierre, R., Goodson, B., Layzer, J., & Bernstein, L. (1997). National impact eva-
luation of the comprehensive child development program. Final Report. Retrieved


March 05, 2005, from .

Stratos, A. (2003). A good preschool education is important in today’s world. Commu-
nity Guide. Retrieved May 24, 2005, from http://mid.gui-

Sucuka, N., fienocak, D., Kaplan, D., & Özkök, S. (1999). 7 çok geç! Erken çocukluk
e¤itiminin önemi üzerine düflünceler ve öneriler. ‹stanbul: Anne-Çocuk E¤itim Vak-

Super, C. M., Herrera, M. G., & Mora, J. O. (1990). Long-term effects of food supp-
lementation and psychosocial intervention on the physical growth of Colombian in-
fants at risk of malnutrition. Child Development, 61 29-49.

Temel, F. (2003). Aile e¤itim modeli dünya’da ve Türkiye’deki uygulamalar. Erken
çocukluk e¤itimi politikalar›: Yayg›nlaflma, yönetiflim ve yap›lar toplant›s› raporu.
Ankara. 4 Ocak 2004 tarihinde adresin-
den edinilmifltir.

Temel, F. (2004). T.C. Baflbakanl›k Devlet ‹statistik Enstitüsü nüfus ve kalkinma
göstergeleri 2004. 4 fiubat 2006 tarihinde’aile=1 adre-
sinden edinilmifltir.

Unesco. (2005). Unesco Institute of Statistics (UIS). Retrieved October 09, 2005,

Unicef. (2004). Unicef Annual Report 2004. Retrieved October 09, 2005, from

Unicef. (2006a). UNICEF Bolivia. Retrieved February 06, 2006 from

Unicef. (2006b). UNICEF India. Retrieved March 11, 2006, from http://www.uni-

Van der Gaag, J., & Tan, J. P. (1998). The benefits of early child development programs:
An economic analysis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from

World Bank, (2001). Brazil Early Child Development: A focus on the Impact of Presc-
hools, Document of the World Bank, Report No. 22841-BR. Retrieved April 24, 2005,

Yoshikawa, H. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on social out-
comes and delinquency. The Future of Children, 5 (3), 51-75.

Zill, N., Resnick, G., Kim, K., McKey, R. H., Clark, C., Pai-Samant, S., Connell, D.,

Vaden-Kiernan, M., O’Brien, R. and D’Elio, M. A. (2001). Head start family and
child experiences survey faces: Longitudinal findings on program performance. Third
progress report. Washington, DC: Administration on Children, Youth, and Families,

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved January 23, 2005, from .

KARTAL / Investments for Future: Early Childhood Development and Education • 553


EK Tablo 1
UNESCO ‹statistik Enstitüsü Verilerine Göre Baz› Ülkelerin 2004 Y›l› Demografik

Bolivya 8.645 1.9 59 34 2497 4 47 3 95 39 86.5

Brezilya 176.257 1.2 35 22 7.726 7 57 8 97 21 88.4

Kolombiya 43.526 1.8 20 23 6382 10 37 6 87 24 94.2

Hindistan 1.049.549 1.6 68 81 2.674 … 34 1 88 12 61

Jamaika 2.627 0.8 17 13 3.950 5 86 7 95 17 87.6

Türkiye 70.318 1.6 38 10 6.389 14 16 … 86 28 88.3

Fransa 59.850 0.5 4 … 27.123 0 100 12 99 56 98.7

Kanada 31.271 0.9 5 … 29.865 0 65 4 100 69 98.7

‹talya 57.482 0 4 … 26.460 0 100 8 100 69 91.4

Japonya 127.478 0.2 3 … 26.808 0 85 3 100 51 98.7

Almanya 82.414 0.2 4 … 27.175 17 100 9 99 51 98.7

‹ngiltere 59.068 0.3 5 … 26.134 0 78 … 100 64 98.7

A.B.D. 291.038 1.1 7 … 35.924 7 58 … 92 83 98.7

Rusya Fed. 144.082 -0.5 18 … 8309 11 98 … 90 69 97.4
































































































Summary Response Paper:

Basic Structure

(Your Name)

ENG 240

Professor _______

Summary: Name of Article, Author. Full citation of article in the chosen citation style of

your field.

(300 words max, 50 min)

Response: (500 words min).


• Thesis #1:

• Thesis #2:

• Thesis #3:

In this assignment, you are going to write a brief summary of your primary response article. Next, you
are going to respond to that article by bringing up your thoughts or feelings on it. As we learned in
ENG 100, academic writing is a conversation, and an important part of the conversation is to
summarize what someone else has written before we respond to it. This helps our audience understand
the broader conversation that we are entering.

  • The Summary (50-300 words).
  • Our summaries should try to capture the main arguments of the paper/article as fairly as possible, even
    if we disagree with the points the article is making. Though we try to be fair, we are also selective, for
    we want to focus our summaries on what is relevant to the point we want to make.
    For example, if I were writing a summary of “Why Games are Good for You” by Stephen Johnson, I
    would survey the article first. I would notice that much of the article is focused on the distinction
    between books and games and some of the article is devoted to discussing the virtues of hand-eye
    coordination. If my argument is primarily about the content of games, these aren’t areas where I will
    focus my summary. I will focus my summary on the areas that are relevant to my paper.
    For example:
    In “Why Games are Good for You” Steven Johnson argues that the beneficial ways a person thinks
    when playing video games is an under-explored subject. He stresses interactivity and community, but
    mainly he mainly focuses on why video games are so entertaining. To do so, he delves into
    neuroscience and what goes into the idea of gratification. He argues that video games are beneficial
    mainly because they practice the player in delayed gratification. He claims that “It is not what you’re
    thinking about when you’re playing a game, it’s the way you’re thinking that matters” (493).
    This summary attempts to convey the basics of Johnson’s argument without getting bogged down in
    sections of the paper that aren’t relevant to the point that I want to make. Remember, the point of a
    summary is to set up the “They Say” before you get to your claim, the “I Say”.

  • The Response (500 words min).
  • You have likely already formulated a basic response to the article in your “entering the conversation”
    activity. Now it is time to build and refine those thoughts. Keep in mind that it is okay if your thoughts
    on the subject have changed or shifted. You may need to return to the “entering the conversation
    activity” and reread what you wrote, for you might have realized there is a better point to argue. For
    example, just in writing the summary above, I realized that I also don’t quite agree with Johnson’s
    point that video games teach delayed gratification. Perhaps that would be a more productive argument
    than the original one I explored. Part of thinking like a scholar is being willing to follow where your
    thoughts lead. Many responses will move toward the thesis by assessing the strengths and weaknesses
    of your primary response article. Many responses will focus on establishing the “gap” in the
    conversation that you will attempt to fill.
    After you have written your response, write three different thesis statements that you think best
    encapsulate your main argument.

      The Summary (50-300 words).
      The Response (500 words min).


    Calculate the price of your paper

    Total price:$26
    Our features

    We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

    Need a better grade?
    We've got you covered.

    Order your paper