Need at least 450+ words with no plagiarism. For your reference attached Powerpoints slides
Reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Identify what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding.
Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:
1. Explain the pros and cons of utilizing litigation to resolve a dispute as opposed to alternatives to dispute resolution.
2. Peter Plaintiff is citizen of Kentucky. He drives to Tennessee and purchases a lawn mover from Lousy Lawn Mowers, Inc. Peter Plaintiff returns to Kentucky and is seriously injured when the lawnmower explodes during normal use. Lousy Lawn Mowers, Inc. does not do business in Kentucky and is incorporated in Delaware. May Peter Plaintiff bring a lawsuit against Lousy Lawn Mowers, Inc. in a state or federal court, and why?
[post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review]
Chapter 3
The Judicial System
Its Legal, Ethical, and
Global Environment
Marianne M. Jennings
Business
11th Ed.
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
0
3-1
Trial Courts
Place where case begins
Jury hears cases and decides disputed issues of fact
Single judge presides over case
Appellate Courts
Review actions of trial court
Usually have published opinions for uniformity and consistency
No trials held – panel of judges hears case
Types of Courts
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
1
3-2
How Courts Make Decisions
Process of Judicial Review (Appellate)
Determine whether error was made
Transcript is reviewed
All other evidence is reviewed
Parties submit written briefs to summarize the evidence and issues
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
2
3-3
Process of Judicial Review (Appellate)
Oral arguments may be made before panel of judges
Generally three judges, but at U.S. Supreme Court level it is nine
En banc : full bench hears case
Judges vote on whether there is reversible error
Error that might have affected the outcome
How Courts Make Decisions
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3
3-4
Process of Judicial Review (Appellate)
Possible actions of reviewing court
Affirm—no reversible error and decision stands
Reverse—reversible error and decision is reversed
Remand—error that requires further proceedings
Modify—change ruling of lower court
Statutory interpretation
Courts at appellate level can review statutory application
Can determine scope of statute
How Courts Make Decisions
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
4
3-5
Consider 3.2
The Porch/Stoop and the Law Student
Is visible drinking on private property covered by a statute that prohibits public drinking?
Consider the implications – how far would the statute go – if you could see through an open window or open door that someone was drinking?
Intent of statute
Exceptions for neighborhood parties
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-6
Process of Judicial Review
Judicial review and case precedent—the doctrine of stare decisis
Courts will follow previous decisions for consistency
Previous decisions are called precedent
How Courts Make Decisions
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
6
3-7
Process of Judicial Review
Interpreting precedent
The rule of law in the case is the precedent
Dicta is not the precedent
Dicta is the discussion of the relevant law
Exceptions to stare decisis—when precedent may not be followed
Cases are factually distinguishable
Precedent is from another jurisdiction
Technology changes
Sociological, moral, or economic changes
How Courts Make Decisions
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
7
3-8
Plaintiffs
Initiate the lawsuit
Called petitioners in some cases
Defendants
Alleged to have violated some right of the plaintiff
Party named in the suit for recovery
Parties in the Judicial System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
8
3-9
Lawyers
Those who act as advocates for plaintiffs and defendants
Have fiduciary relationship with clients
Represent client and see that procedures are followed
Privilege exists with client
Must keep what client tells them confidential
Exception is advance notice of crime to be committed
Parties in the Judicial System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
9
3-10
Parties in the Judicial System
(This information is beyond what is in the text)
Plaintiffs – originate suite Represented
Defendants – party from whom plaintiff seeks recovery By Lawyers
INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS
Avocati
Italy Procuratori
Advocate – High Courts
Quebec/France Notaire – Real Property Transactions
Juridique – Legal Counselor
Japan Bengoshi
Great Britain/ Solicitors – Advice, Documents
Canada Barristers – Higher Courts
Rechtsanwalt – Litigator
Germany Rechtsbeistand – Advice
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-11
Judges
Can control proceedings or outcomes
Can be elected or appointed
Trial or Appellate
Trial Judge presides over trial
Appellate Judge hears appeal from trial court
Parties in the Judicial System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
11
3-12
Name Changes for Parties on Appeal
Appellant or Petitioner: Party appealing the lower court’s decision
Appellee or Respondent: Party who won below and is not appealing
Some states reverse the name of the case on appeal; example: Smith v. Jones − trial court, Jones loses and appeals; Jones v. Smith − appellate court
Parties in the Judicial System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
12
3-13
Jurisdiction is the Authority of a Court to Hear a Case
Types of Jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case
In personam jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the parties in a case
Jurisdiction
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
13
3-14
Federal Court System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
14
3-15
Federal District Court
General trial court of the federal system
Subject matter jurisdiction
When U.S. is a party
Federal question
Diversity of citizenship
Federal Court System
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
15
3-16
Federal Court System
Limited Jurisdiction
One issue that arises is what law will be applied to the case
Federal courts apply state law, they do not make up a new system of federal common law
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
16
3-17
Federal Court System
Specialized Courts − Courts of Limited Original Jurisdiction
Tax court
Bankruptcy court
Claims Court
Judge Advocate General (military courts)
Courts for other agencies
Court of International Trade
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
17
Structure
There are ninety-four federal districts
Each state is at least one federal district and Puerto Rico and DC are also federal districts (94 federal district courts)
Virgin Islands, Guam, and Northern Mariana islands also have a federal court
Number of districts per state is determined by population and case load
3-18
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-19
Federal Court System
Federal District Court Opinions
Opinions are reported in the Federal Supplement
Cite: F.Supp. (F.Supp.2d.)
Example: Sansotta v. Town of Nags Head, 97 F. Supp. 3d 713 (E.D.N.C. 2014)
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
19
3-20
Federal Court System
Court of Appeals
Formerly known as U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Thirteen federal circuits
Generally a panel of three judges reviews appeals from Federal District Court
Opinions found in Federal Reporter
Cite: F., F.2d or F.3d.
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver v. Burwell, 794 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir. 2010)
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
20
3-21
Federal Court System
Supreme Court
Must decide to review cases
Issues writs of certiorari on those cases they will review-determined by the rule of four
Has original jurisdiction for
Disputes between and/or among states
Charges of espionage or ambassadors and foreign consuls
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
21
3-22
Federal Court System
Supreme Court
Nine judges with lifetime appointments
Opinions reported in:
United States Reports—official reports
Citizens United v Federal Election Com’n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010), 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010)
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
22
3-23
State Court Systems
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
23
3-24
State Court Systems
General Trial Court
Usually called superior, circuit, district, or county court
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
24
3-25
State Court Systems
Lesser Courts
Small claims: Lesser damage claims, no Lawyer
Justice of the Peace courts
Smaller damage claims
Lawyers permitted to appear
Traffic courts: For citations
Probate courts: For wills, guardianships, conservatorships, etc.
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
25
State Appellate Courts
Courts of Appeal or State Appellate Courts and State Supreme Courts
Opinions reported in regional reporters
Example: Pacific Reporter, P. , P.2d., P.3d
Example: Hoag v. French, 357 P. 3d 153 (Ariz. App. 2015)
Opinions also reported in state reporters
Example: DirectTV v. Imburgia, 170 Cal. Rptr. 3d (Cal. 2014)
Wyman v. Ayer Properties, 11 N.E.2d 1074 (Mass. 2014)
3-26
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-27
Regional Reporter State Groupings
Pacific (P. or P.2d)
Alaska
Arizona
(California)
Colorado
Hawaii
Idaho
Kansas
Montana
Nevada
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Oregon
Utah
Washington
Wyoming
Northwestern (N.W. or N.W.2d)
Iowa
Michigan
Minnesota
Nebraska
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wisconsin
Southwestern (S.W. or S.W.2d)
Arkansas
Kentucky
Missouri
Tennessee
Texas
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-28
Regional Reporter State Groupings
Northeastern (N.E. or N.E. 2d)
Illinois
Indiana
Massachusetts
(New York)
Ohio
Atlantic (A. or 2d)
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maine
Maryland
New Hampshire
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Vermont
Southeastern (S.E. or S.E.2d)
Georgia
North Carolina
South Carolina
Virginia
West Virginia
Southern (So. or So.2d)
Alabama
Florida
Louisiana
Mississippi
Note: California and New York each has its own reporter system. Source: The national reporter system was developed by West Publishing Company. Reprinted with permission of West Publishing Company.
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-29
Sample Page of a National Reporter Case
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-30
State Court Systems
Venue
Location of court in the system within a jurisdiction
Venue in criminal cases can change from location of crime to another court if press coverage is excessive
Civil venue is often where defendant resides or where the cause of action occurred
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
30
3-31
Personal Jurisdiction
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-32
In Personam Jurisdiction
Means for Acquiring Jurisdiction
Property ownership in the state = in rem jurisdiction
Volunteer − parties agree to it
Presence in the state
Residence
Corporations incorporated or doing business in the state
Minimum contacts – constitutional standards of contact with a state (“Long-Arm” Statutes)
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
32
Minimum Contacts and Long-Arm Statutes
Case 3.1 Hard Candy, LLC v. Hard Candy Fitness (2015)
How much of a presence did Hard Candy Fitness have in Florida? What about Florida deals?
What happens if the defendant is not required to come to Florida to defend the suit?
What are the implications if the company is not required to come and defend the lawsuit?
3-33
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
3-34
The International Courts
International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Part of U.N.
Jurisdiction is contentious (parties must agree to submit)
EU Courts
Court of Justice of European Communities
European Court of Human Rights
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Opinion Found in International Law Reports
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
34
3-35
The International Courts
London’s Commercial Court
Site of many international arbitrations
Jurisdiction Issues in International Courts
Similar to in personam jurisdiction
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
35
3-36
The International Courts
Conflicts of Law
Court systems vary
Tort recovery more liberal in U.S.
No contingency fees allowed elsewhere
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
36
Chapter 4
Managing Disputes: ADR and Litigation Strategies
Its Legal, Ethical, and
Global Environment
Marianne M. Jennings
Business
11th Ed.
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
0
4-1
Types of ADR
Arbitration − Oldest Form of ADR
Parties submit grievances and evidence to a third party expert in an informal setting
American Arbitration Association provides many arbitrators and rules
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
1
4-2
Types of ADR
Arbitration Advantages
Less formality
Handled privately
Expert handles the cases
Speed was once an advantage, but tends to move as slowly as court cases now
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
2
Types of ADR
Arbitration Disadvantages
Arbitrator may not have legal training and may not understand the significance of legal points
Rules of evidence do not apply
Expense and complexity has increased
Cost has increased
4-3
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Federal Arbitration Act
Passed to stop judicial interference with arbitration
Courts now rarely interfere with arbitration clauses in consumer contracts
4-4
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Federal Arbitration Act
Courts now rarely interfere with arbitration decisions
CFPB has proposed eliminating arbitration requirement for consumer credit contract
4-5
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
4-6
Types of ADR
Case 4.1 College Park Pentecostal Holiness Church v. General Steel Corp. (2012)
What was the basis for setting aside the arbitration clause?
How binding is arbitration?
Could the decision have been affected by the fact that there was a church involved?
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
6
4-7
Types of ADR
Arbitration Procedures
Parties agree to submit to arbitration
American Arbitration Association (AAA) can handle the proceedings for a fee
Demand for arbitration is filed
Arbitrator is selected
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
7
4-8
Types of ADR
Mediation
Parties use a go-between to negotiate and communicate
Used in international transactions
Mediator can offer suggestions for resolution
Not binding
MedArb
Recent creation in which arbitrator first attempt to mediate settlement
If unsuccessfully the case goes to arbitration
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
8
4-9
Types of ADR
Minitrial
Small-scale trial where parties present case to a judge with experience in the field or to a neutral advisor
Advisor or judge makes decision
Can motivate parties to resolve differences even if the results are not binding
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
9
4-10
Types of ADR
Rent-a-Judge
Trial held in commercial as opposed to a public court
Pay fees for courtroom and judge
Example: “The People’s Court” TV show
Summary Jury Trials
Gives parties an idea about jury’s perceptions
Used after discovery is complete
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
10
4-11
Types of ADR
Early Neutral Evaluation
Consultant or volunteer gives parties an assessment of the position
Generally used prior to discovery
Saves expenses if parties settle following the evaluation
Peer Review
Review of Management’s action against employee by a group of peer – employees
Reduces litigation cost
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
11
4-12
International ADR
International Chamber of Commerce
A private organization that handles 250 arbitration cases each year
Has used arbitration since 1922
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
12
4-13
International ADR
Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
An international arbitral for investors
Investment contracts can provide for arbitration by ICSID
Parties Free to Choose Which Courts Will Hear Their Disputes
Party autonomy
U.S. courts are a popular choice
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
13
4-14
Litigation vs. ADR
Technical discovery rules Open lines of communication
Judicial constraints of precedent Parties can agree to virtually anything
Remedies limited Creative remedies
Docket backlog Parties set time line
Public proceeding Private
Control by lawyers Control by parties
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
14
4-15
Litigation vs. ADR
Expensive Less expensive (some changes here)
Strict procedures and timing Flexible
Judge and juries unknown Parties select
Judicial enforcement Enforcement by good faith
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
15
4-16
The Trial Process
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
4-17
When You Are in Litigation…
People Begin Civil Lawsuits
System does not do it for them
Based on a claim of right
Lawsuits are efforts of individuals to enforce their rights
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
17
4-18
Step 1 − Filing a Complaint or Petition
Complaint is general statement of claim
Must describe actions that led to claim of violation
Must establish jurisdiction and venue of court in which it is filed
Class actions are often filed against businesses
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
18
4-19
Step 2 − Service of Process
Complaint or petition and summons served on defendant
Summons explains to defendant his/her rights
Where to defend
How long to defend
The effect of not defending the suit
Delivered by an officer of the court or by licensed private process servers
In exceptional circumstances, service is accomplished by publication
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
19
4-20
Step 3 − The Answer
Content of answer
Defendant can admit allegations in complaint are true
Defendant can deny allegations in complaint
Defendant can counterclaim − effect is the defendant is also suing plaintiff for damages
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
20
4-21
Step 3 − The Answer
Failure to file an answer within the statutory time period is a default
Time limits for filing answers are typically twenty to thirty days
Like a forfeit in sports − plaintiff wins because the defendant fails to show up
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
21
4-22
Step 4 − Ending a Suit Through Motions
Motion for judgment on the pleadings
Even if everything the plaintiff said in the complaint were true, there is no cause for action
If court grants motion, the case is over at the trial court level (appeal is possible)
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
22
4-23
Step 5 − Pre Trial Motions
Motion for summary judgment
Appropriate in cases where there are no factual issues
Used to resolve questions of law when the parties agree on the facts
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
23
4-24
Step 6 − Discovery
Forms of discovery to supplement evidence released
Requests for admissions − request from one party to another for the admission of facts so that proof requested at trial is limited
Interrogatories − written questions submitted to opposition
Depositions − statements of parties or witnesses taken under oath in an informal setting
Request for mental or physical examination or for inspection
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
24
4-25
Step 6 − Discovery
Requests for production: documents, physical evidence
Only relevant, non-privileged information is discoverable
No:
Work product
Attorney/client privilege
Husband/wife privilege
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
25
4-26
Case 4.2 Pulte Home Corp. v. Simerly (2013)
Discuss what evidence was at issue.
Explain what happened with the evidence and who did it.
What should managers learn from this case and what should they do when lawyers are obtaining documents.
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
26
4-27
Step 7 − The Trial
Jury trial
Required in cases where damages over $20 are claimed (unless waived)
Absolute right to jury trial is only in criminal cases
Jurors selected from voting or drivers’ license lists
Voir dire
Used to narrow jurors for panel
Ask questions about their knowledge of the case, level of education, background, etc.
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
27
4-28
Step 7 − The Trial
Voir dire
Can be challenged for cause − incapable of making an impartial decision when they know parties, when they were involved with the case
Peremptory challenge − limited number of challenges used by attorneys to remove potential jurors with whom they are uncomfortable
However, may not be based on race or sex
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
28
4-29
Step 7 − The Trial
Plaintiff’s case
Presents witnesses − direct examination
Defendant can cross-examine plaintiffs’ witnesses
Opening Statement
Gives summary of the case and witnesses and how they fit together to prove necessary elements
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
29
4-30
Step 7 − The Trial
Post-plaintiff’s case motion − motion for a directed verdict
Plaintiff must prove all elements − called a prima facie case
Failure to prove all elements entitles defendant to a directed verdict
Made with jury excused
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
30
4-31
Step 7 − The Trial
Defendant’s case
Presents witnesses − direct examination
Plaintiff can cross-examine defendant’s witnesses
Types of evidence
Witnesses’ testimony
Documents
Photographs
Tangible items
Hearsay − can be admissible to establish facts other than the truth of the matter asserted
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
31
4-32
Step 7 − The Trial
Closing arguments
Each side summarizes case presented
Jury instructions
Judge explains law to jurors
Law is written in form for jurors to apply
Lawyers have input on instructions
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
32
4-33
Step 7 − The Trial
Jury deliberations
Some states do not require unanimous verdicts in civil cases – only a majority
If the jury can’t reach a verdict, a hung jury results in a mistrial
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
33
4-34
Step 7 − The Trial
Jury verdict
Decisions of the jury
One side can request to have the jury polled − occasionally any pressure exerted will come out then
Post-trial motions
Motion for a judgment NOV (non obstante veredicto) − motion for a judgment
Notwithstanding the verdict; effect is a trial court judge reversing the jury verdict − rarely done
Motion for a new trial − judge orders case retried
When You Are in Litigation…
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
34
4-35
Steps in Civil Litigation
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
4-36
Steps in Civil Litigation (cont’d)
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
4-37
International Litigation
Which Laws Apply?
Foreign citizens may not come to U.S. to benefit from our traditionally liberal recovery rules and higher verdicts if there are adequate remedies in their own country
©2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
37