Identification of Social Care Provisions
Globalization of societies has cause increased reliance of technology especially in workplace and this comes with a threat of sedentary lifestyle. Huge population of workforce in office-based settings along with long working hours have made sedentary lifestyle a critical public health concern (Waters et al. 2016). Sedentary lifestyle the major concern behind obesity, type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (Inyang and Stella 2015). The following essay aims to highlight the social care provisions available to address the health concerns associated with sedentary lifestyle in both workplace settings and or due to disability. The essay then throws light over the challenges in implementing such care. The essay also discusses sociological and psychological theories associated with sedentary behaviour and how the flow of lifestyle forces a person to develop sedentary behaviour. Towards the end, the essay focuses on the inequalities in socio-economic stature prevalent in UK and how it influences sedentary lifestyle.
Identification the range of social care provision, formal and informal, and challenges that face the delivery of these services
Sedentary behaviour is different from the concept of being physically inactive. Evidence suggests that prolonged sitting cast detrimental health effects and efforts should be taken to address this public health concern. Many co-corporate bodies have developed interventions and subsequently implemented the same in order to reduce the health threats coming from sedentary behaviour. Some of the interventions include increase in number of short breaks in-between bouts of sitting (Waters et al. 2016). Waters et al. (2016) further opined that most effective technique in reducing sedentary behaviour is environmental modification along with individual education. According to Parry et al. (2013), participatory workplace interventions can help to reduce the overall sedentary time and thereby increasing the frequency of breaks and improvement towards light activity. However, there are numerous barriers towards successful reduction of sedentary behaviour among the office workers with special mention on workplace culture, physical environment and norms (Waters et al. 2016). The infrastructure of the office building for example availability of lift creates barrier towards reducing workplace sedentary behaviour. Moreover, majority of office buildings lack adjustable workstations or standing meetings or common rooms, further creating barriers towards reducing the tendency of sedentary lifestyle in workplace (Waters et al. 2016).
In case of people with disability, particular social treatment they receive from their peers like sympathy for their physical condition generates a feeling of anger or inferiority complex among them. Apart from anger, they pass through a number of emotional complications and most significant among this is loss of future expectation or hope in life. This is due to their hopelessness that they refuse to take self-initiatives to overcome their disability and thus becomes not only a victim of depression, but also a major ill-health target of sedentary lifestyle (Harrison et al. 2017). According to the National Health Service UK (2017), there are number of social services available in UK in order to assist people with physical disability. This care and support services include equipment and personal help or the assistance towards mobility, community support, financial support, home adaptations and residential care. One of the important examples of equipment is hoists that help people with disability to get on and off chairs while going to toilet, taking bath or going to sleep over bed. UK National Health Science also have provision for mobility scooters and powered wheelchairs to assist people with disability and a person need not to have a license to drive such mobility scooter or powered wheelchair but are required to register it. However, majority of people who belong to under low socio-economic group are either not aware of such amenities or lack the financial strength to avail the same.
Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior at Workplace
Explore the impact of sociological and psychological theories on behaviour and society
Apart from the long working hours, the sedentary lifestyle under workplace setting is also dependent on the personal habits, social norms of sitting at desk and availability of specific set of upholstery (Waters et al. 2016). People, who belong to higher socio-economic group, tend to execute higher level of sedentary behaviour even after returning from office and this tendency increases if their parents or siblings also engage in high level of sedentary behaviour. Moreover, people who fall under high financial bracket have personal maidservants who satisfy their daily home activities like cooking, cleaning and dusting and thus preventing them to perform any sort of physical activity even while at home (Inyang and Stella 2015). The same concept goes within the office premises too. People who work on higher managerial position have air-conditioned home, comfortable revolving chairs and air conditioned car with personal driver. All the amenities create a state of supremacy and then develop a tendency availing the help from the office boys in tasks like fetching coffee, refilling water in bottle and carrying the corporate bag up to the car. All these further increases the threats coming from the sedentary lifestyle (Schröer, Haupt and Pieper 2013).
Disabled group of population experience challenging atmosphere that has negligible access to culturally significant services along with oppressive societal tendencies all these cumulates to marginal social participation (Cheng 2009). According to the grounded theory as proposed by Galvin (2005), disabled people receive negative perceptions or behaviours from other. They are other patronized or pitied and this kind of behaviour singles them out for unsolicited attention. They are at times treated to be invisible, this sense of neglection make them believe that they are sexually unattractive or unqualified to enter into a healthy relationships. Thus they have minimal opportunities for love and this generates a sense of hopelessness. These essences of despair make them to pass through severe depression and provoking them to lead a sedentary life altogether (Cheng 2009).
Explaining the nature-nature debate and suggesting a range of factors that influence life-course development and life chances from both prospective
Sitting in workplace is mostly dependent on occupation type and kind of tasks involved. According to Waters et al. (2016), on a typical working day, at least 77% of total work hours are spent on sedentary activities. So people who lead a sedentary life are required to abide by certain health behaviours. In general the health behaviour among people is an amalgamation of their individual characteristics (for example income, salary, age, education and job type) and environmental factors (like recreational infrastructure, initiatives towards physical activities, use of land and to participate in sports activity) (Biernat and Pi?tkowska 2014). However, under extreme work-pressure, surrounding environment does not actively influence the development of healthy behaviour. People who reside under that particular environment do not enthusiastically promote physical activity and cite numerous barriers towards optimal access of sport initiatives. So in such uncooperative environment, motivation coming from the social groups and governmental plan is the only driving force behind the engagement of physical activity in between long working hours of after the completion of working hours. The developing the fate of workplace sedentary life style is not written before birth, it is the consequences of the surrounding socio-economic platform and personal requirement. A person in order to earn more for his family is compelled to work-more, leading to sedentary behaviour (Biernat and Pi?tkowska 2014).
Challenges in Implementing Care
Explain the concept of inequality in society and how it impacts on social groups
People who belongs to under low socio-economic group, tend to be the major victims of sedentary lifestyle at workplace as due to their financial crisis, they are compelled to do desk job with long working hours. However, this social inequality has other aspect over sedentary lifestyle for example people who belong to higher socio-economic status have more television sets and computers at their home as a result even after returning from office they remain glued in front of television sets, negating the chance of executing physical activities (Inyang and Stella 2015).
Gender inequality is another important aspect behind the increase in the rate of sedentary lifestyle. Increase in self-earning has a positive impact on health but the effect on increase in spousal money is somewhat complicated. For example, among the heterosexual married population, an increase in wives’ salary has a positive impact on their health but has a negative impact on their male counterparts (Ramsay et al. 2008). However, the reverse concept is not true for the wives as they genuinely become happy with the news of their husbands’ increase in salary structure. Now a husband whose wife earns more than him, try to indulge into certain invisible corporate competition with his wife. Here the motive is to increase the work-flow via performing more and better and getting more financial career prospects. With a concept of performing more, a person needs to work extra hours leading to increase in the tenure of sedentary behaviour (Hurst, Gibbon and Nurse 2016).
Conclusion
Thus from the above discussion it can be concluded that sedentary life style is the driving cause behind high prevalence of obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In the present day scenario, increase in work-pressure along with increase in the total work hours is the main reason behind the increase in tendency of sedentary lifestyle. Apart from work place sedentary lifestyle there also lays sedentary behaviour arising out of sudden range of disability, with a special mention for knee injury or replace or paralysis. Though several initiatives have been taken both from government and private sector bodies, there still lays sudden gaps in implementing these targets at optimal level both in workplace and with the person who is differently able.
References
Biernat, E. and Pi?tkowska, M., 2014. Individual and environmental factors determining sedentary lifestyle of the Polish population. Iranian journal of public health, 43(8), p.1033.
Cheng, R.P., 2009. Sociological theories of disability, gender, and sexuality: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(1), pp.112-122.
Galvin, R.D., 2005. Researching the disabled identity: Contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(3), pp.393-413.
Harrison, C., Falvo, D., Weiss, V. and Holland, B.E., 2017. Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Hurst, C.E., Gibbon, H.M.F. and Nurse, A.M., 2016. Social inequality: Forms, causes, and consequences. Routledge.
Inyang, M. and Stella, O., 2015. Sedentary lifestyle: health implications. J Nursing Health Sci, 4, pp.20-5.
National Health Science UK. 2017. Mobility scooters and powered wheelchairs: the rules – GOV.UK. [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/mobility-scooters-and-powered-wheelchairs-rules [Accessed 6 Feb. 2018].
Parry, S., Straker, L., Gilson, N.D. and Smith, A.J., 2013. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers—a randomised controlled trial. PloS one, 8(11), p.e78957.
Ramsay, S.E., Whincup, P.H., Morris, R.W., Lennon, L.T. and Wannamethee, S.G., 2008. Extent of social inequalities in disability in the elderly: results from a population-based study of British men. Annals of epidemiology, 18(12), pp.896-903.
Schröer, S., Haupt, J. and Pieper, C., 2013. Evidence-based lifestyle interventions in the workplace—an overview. Occupational medicine, 64(1), pp.8-12.
Waters, C.N., Ling, E.P., Chu, A.H., Ng, S.H., Chia, A., Lim, Y.W. and Müller-Riemenschneider, F., 2016. Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach. BMC public health, 16(1), p.360.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
