Secure Network Application Project Assignment Instructions
Using Microsoft Visio or a subsequent visual design tool, diagram a network in which you are familiar.
Write a thorough report detailing the design.
The report must be a minimum of 5 pages excluding the title page, Visio diagram(s), and references.
It must include, at a minimum, 10 peer-reviewed sources to justify the design.
In the design include (at a minimum):
· 4 Application servers
· 2 Virtual environments
· 4 File servers
· 2 Database servers
· 2 Storage Area Networks
· 4 Virtual Local Area Network segmentations for different roles/levels of user permissions
· 2 Virtual Private Networks
· Appropriate network switches and routers to host the client server architecture
· 2 Demilitarized Zones
· 4 Firewalls
Total 10 Pages 10 references
PROJECT ASSIGNMENT 1
1
THREAT ENVIRONMENT 5
SECURE NETWORK APPLICATION PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
Jerry L. Quarles
School of Business & Computer Science, Liberty University
Author Note
Jerry L. Quarles
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jerry L. Quarles.
Email:
jquarles7@liberty.edu
Table of Contents
Introduction 4
Foundation of Knowledge……………………………………………………………………..
Analysis ………………………………………………………………………………..
Advanced Background on the Topic…………………..……………………………..4
Central Theme /Purpose of the paper………………..………………………………..5
Review of Literature 5
Analyze key legal issues…………………………………….…………………………5
Design description……………………………………………………………………..6
Disaster recovery details………………………………………………………..…..…6
Personal Perspective & Biblical Integration 13
Biblical Scriptures…………………………………………………………………….13
Christian Worldview………………………………………………………………….13
Conclusion 16
References 17
Secure Network Application Project Assignment
10 Pages total
1. Introduction 1 page
2. Foundation of Knowledge 4 pages
3. Review of Literature – 5 pages/6 references
a. analyze, design,
b. an outline of the project – details of the design – 1 page – 2 references
c. anticipated outcomes of the project – Project objectives – 1 page – 2 references
4. Personal Perspective & Biblical Integration – Biblical Scriptures (at least 4 to 5 minimum) and Christian Worldview Advanced comparative analysis of biblical doctrine that is related to the legal subject.
5. Conclusion
6. References – at least 10 scholarly citations.
Executive Summary
Introduction
BMIS 663
Secure Network Application Project Assignment Instructions
Using Microsoft Visio or a subsequent visual design tool, diagram a network in which you are familiar.
Write a thorough report detailing the design.
The report must be a minimum of 5 pages excluding the title page, Visio diagram(s), and references.
It must include, at a minimum, 10 peer-reviewed sources to justify the design.
In the design include (at a minimum):
· 4 Application servers
· 2 Virtual environments
· 4 File servers
· 2 Database servers
· 2 Storage Area Networks
· 4 Virtual Local Area Network segmentations for different roles/levels of user permissions
· 2 Virtual Private Networks
· Appropriate network switches and routers to host the client server architecture
· 2 Demilitarized Zones
· 4 Firewalls
Total 10 Pages 10 references
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction, Idea Exploration
Expansion & Conclusion
15 to >13.
0 pts
Advanced
Student’s
introduction and
written analysis
effectively
provides
advanced
background on
the topic of the
paper. The
central theme or
purpose of the
paper is
emphasized
throughout in
advanced detail.
The conclusion
is well written
and logically
derives from the
paper’s ideas
and reviews the
major points
toward the
appropriate
audience. The
key legal issues
are thoroughly
presented in
advanced and
rich detail. The
written ideas
flow in a highly
effective, logical
and organized
manner. There is
an advanced
logical
progression of
claims from
introduction to
conclusion.
13 to >11.0 pts
Proficient
Student’s
introduction and
written analysis
is proficient and
provides
sufficient
background on
the topic of the
paper. The
central theme or
purpose of the
paper is
sufficient and the
development of
theme is
emphasized in
different areas of
the written
analysis. The
conclusion is
written in a
proficient manner
and addresses
most of the major
points and
logically draws
upon most
aspects of the
paper’s ideas.
The key legal
issues are
discussed,
presented, and
developed in a
proficient manner
in different areas
of the written
analysis. The
written ideas flow
in a mostly
logical and
organized
manner. There is
a mostly
proficient and
logical
progression of
ideas from
introduction to
1
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Student’s introduction
and written analysis is
developmental and
medium level. The
analysis provides
some aspects or
minimal background
on the topic and major
points of the paper.
The central theme or
purpose of the paper
is developing,
disparate and is
insufficiently
developed throughout
the written analysis.
The conclusion is not
fully developed and
does not fully and
logically draw upon
most aspects of the
paper’s ideas or
reviews the major
points. The key legal
issues are presented
at a medium level of
exploration and is not
developed in full detail
throughout the written
analysis. The written
ideas are sometimes
unorganized,
disconnected and
there is not always a
smooth progression of
claims from
introduction to
conclusion. Some
sources are
authoritative, but, not
all.
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
1
5 pts
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
conclusion.
Foundation of Knowledge 17 to >15.0 pts
Advanced
Student’s written
analysis
effectively
covers all key
theories and
elements of the
assignment topic
in an advanced
and substantive
way. The
content is
comprehensive,
accurate, and/or
persuasive. The
arguments made
throughout the
paper are clear
and convincing,
presenting a
persuasive claim
in a distinctive
and compelling
manner. The
major points are
stated clearly in
an advanced
manner and are
supported by
professional
literature or
logic. Synthesis
of source
information is
present and
advanced in
nature.
Arguments show
logical
progressions.
There is a
meaningful use
of source
material and
analytical
reasoning to
elaborate upon
the topic or
15 to >12.0 pts
Proficient
Student’s written
analysis covered
most aspects of
the key theories
and elements
presented in
proficient
manner. It is
substantive and
provides
sufficient
background on
the topic for the
paper. The
content is
proficient, mostly
accurate, and/or
persuasive. The
arguments made
throughout the
paper are
adequate,
convincing,
presenting a
satisfactory claim
in a distinctive
and strong
manner. The
major points are
stated in an
accurate manner
and are
supported by
professional
literature or logic.
Synthesis of
source
information is
present and
proficient in
nature.
Arguments show
logical
progressions.
There is a
proficient and
effective use of
1
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Student’s written
analysis provides
minimal depth to the
topic presented and is
developmental in its
overall scope. Key
theories are absent in
the analysis. The
analysis ineffectively
covers key theories
and elements of the
assignment topic in an
incomplete and
non-substantive way.
The content is
developmental in
nature, contains some
non- persuasive
elements. The
arguments made
throughout the paper
are not fully adequate,
convincing, or present
a satisfactory claim in
a distinctive or
authoritative manner.
The major points are
stated in a developing
manner and are not
always supported by
professional literature
or logic. Synthesis of
source information is
of medium to low
quality in nature.
Argument shows
logical progressions.
Some aspects and
techniques of
argumentation are
evident. There is an
insufficient and
ineffective use of
source material and
analytical reasoning to
expand upon the topic
or theme that is
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
1
7 pts
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
theme is
present. All
sources are
authoritative.
The research is
current, timely,
relevant, and
directly
applicable to
contemporary
situation in the
industry and
topic of
discussion. The
context and
purpose of the
writing is clear.
source material
and analytical
reasoning to
elaborate upon
the topic or
theme is present.
Most sources are
authoritative.
The research is
progressive,
timely, relevant,
and mostly
applicable to the
contemporary
situation in the
industry and the
topic of
discussion.
presented. Some
sources are not
authoritative or
authoritative sources
are missing. The
research is not fully
progressive and/or
relevant or fully
applicable to the
contemporary situation
in the industry and the
topic of discussion.
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Personal Perspective &
Biblical Integration
3 to >2.0 pts
Advanced
Student
incorporated
specific Biblical
Scriptures (at
least 4 to 5
minimum) and
Christian
Worldview
perspective
throughout the
written analysis.
Student
presented
advanced
comparative
analysis of
biblical doctrine
that is related to
the legal subject
matter being
discussed.
Student drew a
broad base of
support from
experience and
information not
available from
assigned
sources.
Student
integrated
his/her own
thinking through
thought
provoking
analysis.
2 to >1.0 pts
Proficient
Student
incorporated
sufficient Biblical
Scriptures (at
least 2 to 3) and
Christian
Worldview
perspective in
most areas of the
written analysis.
Student
presented
sufficient
comparative
analysis of
biblical doctrine
that is related to
subject legal
matter being
discussed.
Draws some
level of support
from experience
and information
not available
from assigned
sources.
Student
integrated his/her
own thinking
through thought
provoking
analysis.
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Student incorporated a
minimum amount of
specific Biblical
Scriptures (less than
2) and Christian
Worldview perspective
throughout the written
analysis. Student
presented marginal
comparative analysis
of biblical doctrine that
is related to subject
legal matter being
discussed. Student
drew some support
from experience and
information not
available from
assigned sources.
Biblical integration
may or may not be
found. Student
integrated a minimum
amount of his/her own
thinking through
thought provoking
analysis.
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
3 pts
Format 7 to >6.0 pts
Advanced
The body of the
paper is at least
10 pages,
separate from
the cover page,
reference page
or other element.
The layout of
6 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
The body of the
paper is at least
10 pages,
separate from
the cover page,
reference page
or other element.
The layout of
4 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The body of the paper
does not meet the
criteria of at least 10
pages, separate from
the cover page,
reference page or
other element. The
written analysis of the
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
7 pts
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
the paper is
highly effective
and
well-designed
and uses
reader-friendly
aids where
needed. The
written analysis
of the material
presented by the
course readings
(internal
sources) as well
as other
academically
approved
sources
(external) are
utilized in most
aspects of the
paper. The
reference page
contains at least
10 scholarly
citations. The
paper meets the
current APA
guideline and is
written in 12pt
font, Times New
Roman, is
double-spaced,
and has 1”
margins. The
work is original
and advanced,
giving credit to
all borrowed
ideas.
the paper is good
and proficiently
designed and
uses some
reader-friendly
aids where
needed. The
written analysis
of the material
presented by the
course readings
(internal sources)
as well as other
academically
approved
sources
(external) are
utilized in a
proficient manner
in most aspects
of the paper.
The reference
page contains
some of the
requirements of
at least 10
scholarly citation,
but not fully. The
paper meets
most aspects of
the current APA
guideline. The
paper is written
in 12pt font,
Times New
Roman, is
double-spaced,
and has 1”
margins. The
work is original
and proficient,
giving credit to
most borrowed
ideas.
material presented by
the course readings
(internal sources) as
well as other
academically
approved sources
(external) are not fully
city correctly or utilized
in most aspects of the
paper. The reference
page contains some of
the requirements of at
least 10 scholarly
citations, but, is
insufficient. The paper
(does not) fully meet
the current APA
guidelines and is (or is
not) written in 12pt
font, Times New
Roman, is
double-spaced, and
has irregular margins.
The work lacks full
originality and
proficiency and does
not give credit to all
borrowed ideas.
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling 3 to >2.0 pts
Advanced
The written
analysis
cohesive and
there was no
grammar or
spelling issues
found.
2 to >1.0 pts
Proficient
The written
analysis was
proficient and
there were few
grammar or
spelling issues
found.
1 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The written analysis
contained some
grammar and spelling
issues. Grammar or
spelling issues were
notable but did not
prevent the reader
from understanding
the key aspects of the
paper.
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
3 pts
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Readability/Style 5 to >3.0 pts
Advanced
The writing
analysis includes
sentences that
are written at a
highly advanced
level, complete,
clear, and
concise. The
sentences are
well-constructed
with consistently
strong and
varied structure.
The
sentence
transitions are
present and
direct the flow of
thought. The
words used are
precise and
unambiguous
throughout the
paper. The
written ideas
flow in a highly
logical and
well-organized
manner.
Paragraph
transitions are
present, highly
logical, and
direct the flow of
thought
throughout the
paper.
3 to >2.0 pts
Proficient
The writing
analysis includes
sentences that
are proficient in
nature, relatively
complete, clear
and concise.
The sentences
are sufficiently
well-constructed
with consistently
strong and varied
structure. The
sentence
transitions are
sufficiently
present and
direct the flow of
thought. The
words used are
detailed and
explicit in most
aspects of the
paper. The
structure of the
paper is clear
and easy to
follow and
emphasizes the
central theme or
purpose.
Paragraph
transitions are
evident,
reasonable, and
direct the flow of
thought
throughout the
paper.
2 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The writing analysis
includes sentences
that are developmental
in nature, and contains
instances of
incomplete and
unclear thought, and
that are not always
concise. The
sentences are not
always constructed or
involves inconsistent,
and varied structure.
Some sentence
transitions are not
present and does not
always direct the flow
of thought. The
words used are not
always precise and
are ambiguous at
times. The structure
of the paper is
intermittent and has
some disconnections
in terms of clarity and
is not always easy to
follow or does not
always and emphasize
the central theme or
purpose. Paragraph
transitions are not
always evident,
acceptable, or fully
direct the flow of
thought throughout the
paper.
0 pts
Not Present
No written
analysis
presented
for this
requirement.
5 pts
Total Points: 50
Secure Network Application Project Grading Rubric |
BMIS663_B01_202220
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
