CMN 61901 University of New Hampshire Internet Connected Door Cameras Essay


Description

In a fresh a Washington Post stipulation – “Ring and Nest Helped Normalize American Surveillance and Turned Us into a Nation of Voyeurs”Preview the document – journalist Drew Harwell discusses the collective consequences of internet-connected door cameras.

Read this stipulation closely and transcribe an essay that responds to the author’s concerns respecting the collective perception of this new technology. In answerableness your essay, you should regard the aftercited questions:

  • What collective “problem” are these new technologies adapted to “solve,” according to the companies that gain them?
  • How was this “problem” addressed before the preliminary of these symbols? In other words, how did commonalty subsist extraneously it?
  • How do the commonalty interviewed for the narrative actually use these technologies? What attached uses do they illustrate?
  • What new “affordances” does the technology make-known? How does the “design” of the symbol desire its use?
  • Why is this new technology controversial? What are some examples of the risks?
  • Who supports the use of this technology? Why?
  • How rule this new technology exexchange communion and collective relationships? How do the concepts of technological determinism and collective understanding of technology employ to this subject?
  • What does the bud of this technology hint environing the effect of journey? How would we mark-out “progress” in this subject?

Your essay should condense insights and effects from of the sequence readings and discussions to conclusion – specifically, issues connected to the concept of technological determinism, the effect of journey, and the collective understanding of technology.

In answerableness your tract, you should allude to the aftercited sequence readings:

  • Leo Marx, “Does Improved Technology Mean Progress?,”Preview the documentTechnology Review (1987): 33-41, 71.
  • David E. Nye, "Does Technology Control Us?,"Preview the documentTechnology Matters (2007), 17-31.
  • Philip Brey, “Artifacts as Collective Agents,”Preview the documentInside the Politics of Technology (2005), 61-73.
  • Ian Hutchby, “Technologies, Texts, and Affordances,”Preview the documentSociology (2001), 441-456.
  • Woodrow Hartzog, “Why Design is Everything,”Preview the documentPrivacy’s Blueprint (2019), 21-55.