Week 3 – assignment case analysis – collaborating with outside | PSY650 | Ashford University


Prior to start effort on this assignment, decipher the PSY650 Week Three Composition Plan Preview the muniment and Subject 9: Bulimia Nervosa in Gorenstein and Comer (2014). Gladden to-boot decipher the Waller, Gray, Hinrichsen, Mounford, Lawson, and Patient (2014) “Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Atypical Bulimic Nervosa: Effectiveness in Clinical Settings,”Halmi (2013) “Perplexities of Composition Resistance in Eating Disorders,” and DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration Among Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Composition of Eating Disorders” designations

Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this subject examine. In your disquisition, gladden understand the forthcoming.

  • Explain the relevance among each presumptive orientation used by Dr. Heston and the composition mediation plans utilized in the subject.
  • Describe the cognitive-behavioral example of the subsistence of bulimia nervosa.
  • Explain why Rita was averse to have-a-share in Dr. Heston’s entreat for her to binder a chronicles of her eating behaviors. Use knowledge from the Halmi (2013) designation “Perplexities of Composition Resistance in Eating Disorders” to aid prop your statements.
  • Recommend after a whileout providers (psychiatrists, medical doctors, nutritionists, political efforters, holistic practitioners, etc.) to the second Rita in achieving her composition goals. Use knowledge from the DeJesse and Zelman (2013) “Promoting Optimal Collaboration among Mental Health Providers and Nutritionists in the Composition of Eating Disorders” designation to aid prop your recommendations.
  • Describe some of the challenges and intellectual issues that Dr. Heston may assault when efforting collaboratively after a while the professionals that you recommended.  Apply intellectual principles and standards of psychology applicable to your term of Dr. Heston’s implicit collaboration after a while after a whileout providers.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the composition mediations implemented by Dr. Heston, proping your statements after a while knowledge from the subject and two to three peer-reviewed designations from the Ashford University Library.
  • Recommend three concomitant composition mediations that would be misspend in this subject. The recommended designations for this week may be serviceable in generating your retort to this proof. Justify your selections after a while knowledge from the subject.

The Subject Analysis – Collaborating after a while Without Providers

  • Must be 4 to 5 double-spaced pages in tediousness (not including heading and references pages) and formatted according to APA diction as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an superficial locality.)Links to an superficial locality..
  • Must understand a disconnected heading page after a while the forthcoming:
    • Title of disquisition
    • Student’s indicate
    • Course indicate and number
    • Instructor’s indicate
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at lowest two peer-reviewed sources from in the Ashford University Library.
  • Must muniment all sources in APA diction as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must understand a disconnected references page that is formatted according to APA diction as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.