Psychology question 6 | Psychology homework help


1. Janet has been seen by you for discoursement of degradation. On intake, she recognizen that she was in AA and had been grave for 6 months. Janet seems to be joyous behind a while her proficiency, but behind a few meetings, she seems to be no communicative and subvert. Behind six meetings, she drop therapy behind a while you. You imbibe that she has chosen another counselor who discourses alcohol use and co-occurring disorders. This dawning you popular attend-to from your licensing table that Janet filed a repining resisting you alleging that you attempted to discourse Janet's addiction to alcohol and that you did not support the expertise essential to do so. You are a licensed administrative counselor but you support not obtained grafting in addictions. Based on this counsel, exculpation the forthcoming doubts:

1. Does Janet support a sound repining? Why or why not?

2. How would you answer to the Licensing table repining?

3. How would you abandon this sign of repining in the forthcoming?

This argument doubt meets the forthcoming CACREP Standard: 2.F.1.i.  Ethical standards of administrative counseling organizations and credentialing bodies, and applications of holy and legitimate considerations in administrative counseling.

2. What misapply precautions or exercitations should a eespecial practitioner inoculate in dispose to minimize administrative jurisdiction and secure that their discoursement of clients dregs soundly behind a whilein the boundaries of administrative exercitation standards? The American Counseling Connection as well-mannered-behaved-behaved as favoring aver counseling connections (i.e., ICA, AzCA) get a multiformity of instrument to clinicians. Choose either the ACA or your aver's counseling connection. What are its part benefits, activities, uses to parts, and popular end? How could partship be in-particular advantageous to the eespecial practitioner? Summarize what the ACA Adjudication of Ethics says encircling the forthcoming: tidings congruity, chronicles custody, and use cancelment.

This argument doubt meets the forthcoming CACREP Standard: 5.C.2.m. Chronicles custody, third policy cancelment, and other exercitation and tenor ends in clinical immaterial vigor counseling.

3. What misapply precautions or exercitations should a eespecial practitioner inoculate in dispose to minimize administrative jurisdiction and secure that their discoursement of clients dregs soundly behind a whilein the boundaries of administrative exercitation standards? The American Counseling Connection as well-mannered-behaved-behaved as favoring aver counseling connections (i.e., ICA, AzCA) get a multiformity of instrument to clinicians. Choose either the ACA or your aver's counseling connection. What are its part benefits, activities, uses to parts, and popular end? How could partship be in-particular advantageous to the eespecial practitioner? Summarize what the ACA Adjudication of Ethics says encircling the forthcoming: tidings congruity, chronicles custody, and use cancelment.

This argument doubt meets the forthcoming CACREP Standard: 5.C.2.m. Chronicles custody, third policy cancelment, and other exercitation and tenor ends in clinical immaterial vigor counseling.

4. Describe in component predicaments in which referring your client to a irrelative counselor and/or exercise should be considered. If referral is not an liberty, what holy alternatives could you fulfill to hold to performance behind a while this client? Include references to the ACA and/or NAADAC adjudication of ethics to livelihood your counterpart.

5. Sheila came to your station encircling 8 months ago seeking counseling. She averd that she, "hoped to reserve her nuptials." Behind a few meetings behind a while Sheila, you suggested that couples counseling agency be advantageous, but her wife, Roy, refused to own-a-share. Three months ago, Sheila and Roy went through a very obscene breakup of their nuptials, and now you support been subpoenaed to fruit all of your chronicless pertaining to Sheila's discoursement. Sheila has told you not to afford behind a while the subpoena.

 What should you do? Why?

 Describe the favoring steps you would select in answering to the subpoena.

6. Marcie is a new client and a 22-year-old womanish who performances as a receptionist in a doctor's station. She has harmonious inspired to you during the inselect meeting that she has recently obsolete profit in most activities, has been quiescent a vast traffic yet feels worn-out all the era, and rarely wishes she could intermit to endure. She mentioned tenderness as though she has been "on an melting roller coaster" during the elapsed year, throughout her on-again/off-again homogeneity behind a while a 35-year-old married man. The latest breakup behind a while him seemed definite, and Marcie has felt herheadstrong putrefaction deeper and deeper into degradation forforever past. When probed aid encircling suicidal ideations, Marcie admitted that she has considered killing herself, although she is dubious whether or not she would in-effect do it. She said that she is popularly in posmeeting of a gun that her ally recognizen her to support in her home forthcoming a foolhardy of burglaries in the vicinity, but she does not recognize whether she would in-effect use it.

You support consulted behind a while your supervisor, who has agreed that Marcie should be referred straightway for a psychiatric evaluation and has instructed you to parcel for Marcie to go straightway from your station to a nearby hospital. Marcie told you that her woman accompanied her and is in the indetermination margin, but she has emphatically averd that she does not scantiness her woman to recognize what is going on behind a while her. How should this elegant predicament be handled? Why? What are three holy and/or legitimate concerns encircling this instance?

This argument doubt meets the forthcoming CACREP Standards:

2.F.1.l. Self-care strategies misapply to the counselor role.

5.C.2.a. Roles and settings of clinical immaterial vigor counselors.

Each doubt has to be exculpationed by it-headstrong and behind a while 150-200 opinion. Each one besides must support a name in it and be cited in the APA form-mate.  They insufficiency to be exculpationed by their headstrong and not concomitantly.