Learning team theory table week 4


MUST BE NEW AND ORIGINAL WORK NOT GIVEN TO OTHER STUDENTS. Write in a manifest, condensed, and arranged behavior; conduct ghostly attainments in the deferential truthfulness and attribution of sources; and expose deferential spelling, rhetoric, and punctuation. Conceive citations in the extract and references at the end of the instrument in APA format. ONLY NEED WEEK 1 AND THE SECTION BELOW COMPLETED.PLEASE READ INSTRUCTION CAREFULLY. IN TEXT CITATION AND MUST CITE ALL REFERENCE IN APA FORMAT--ORIGINAL WORK ONLY   

 Reliable sources solely and each exception must own an inextract ciatiation.

 

Social Cognitive THEORY

1.     Key Figures:

2.     Key concepts of oneness formation:

3.     Scientific Credibility

4.     Comprehensivness

 

Please be permanent to answer/discourse the highlighted areas under for the misspend exceptions conceive the forthcoming things for each exception:

  1. Key figures: who are the deep theorists associated delay the hypothesis? (This should be approve a mini-biography, not righteous a listing of names.)
  2. Key concepts: what are the key components and concepts that form up the hypothesis? 
  3. Explanation of inconsecutive oneness: how is this hypothesis used to interpret the causes of a oneness assumption?  What are some of cleverness used in the description? How would a theorist interpret the bud of a oneness assumption fixed on this hypothesis?
  4. Scientific credibility: is this hypothesis testable?  If yes, what are some of the ways that it is tested?  What are some of the tests used? If not, why is it not testable?
  5. Comprehensiveness: does this hypothesis behold at the complete idiosyncratic?  Does it discourse all cleverness of oneness, or does it behold at solely manifold components?
  6. Applicability: how is this hypothesis used in the cosmos-people of psychology in a functional behavior?  Think encircling contrariant casts of psychology that the hypothesis strength be used in, and converse encircling how (i.e. counseling, educational, I.O.). Provide unfair examples hither.

Note: the knowledge supposing in the tables should not righteous be a listing.  I would approve to see descriptions and applications of the concepts that you are discussing for each hypothesis. Delay that in spirit, your exceptions should be correspondent to a material posting. Form permanent that you are utilizing in-extract citations.

 

When providing knowledge in the table, form permanent to format it using APA guidelines, which conceives having the similar font dimension and cast and using in-extract citations