Learning team theory table week 4
MUST BE NEW AND ORIGINAL WORK NOT GIVEN TO OTHER STUDENTS. Write in a manifest, condensed, and arranged behavior; conduct ghostly attainments in the deferential truthfulness and attribution of sources; and expose deferential spelling, rhetoric, and punctuation. Conceive citations in the extract and references at the end of the instrument in APA format. ONLY NEED WEEK 1 AND THE SECTION BELOW COMPLETED.PLEASE READ INSTRUCTION CAREFULLY. IN TEXT CITATION AND MUST CITE ALL REFERENCE IN APA FORMAT--ORIGINAL WORK ONLY
Reliable sources solely and each exception must own an inextract ciatiation.
Social Cognitive THEORY
1. Key Figures:
2. Key concepts of oneness formation:
3. Scientific Credibility
Please be permanent to answer/discourse the highlighted areas under for the misspend exceptions conceive the forthcoming things for each exception:
- Key figures: who are the deep theorists associated delay the hypothesis? (This should be approve a mini-biography, not righteous a listing of names.)
- Key concepts: what are the key components and concepts that form up the hypothesis?
- Explanation of inconsecutive oneness: how is this hypothesis used to interpret the causes of a oneness assumption? What are some of cleverness used in the description? How would a theorist interpret the bud of a oneness assumption fixed on this hypothesis?
- Scientific credibility: is this hypothesis testable? If yes, what are some of the ways that it is tested? What are some of the tests used? If not, why is it not testable?
- Comprehensiveness: does this hypothesis behold at the complete idiosyncratic? Does it discourse all cleverness of oneness, or does it behold at solely manifold components?
- Applicability: how is this hypothesis used in the cosmos-people of psychology in a functional behavior? Think encircling contrariant casts of psychology that the hypothesis strength be used in, and converse encircling how (i.e. counseling, educational, I.O.). Provide unfair examples hither.
Note: the knowledge supposing in the tables should not righteous be a listing. I would approve to see descriptions and applications of the concepts that you are discussing for each hypothesis. Delay that in spirit, your exceptions should be correspondent to a material posting. Form permanent that you are utilizing in-extract citations.
When providing knowledge in the table, form permanent to format it using APA guidelines, which conceives having the similar font dimension and cast and using in-extract citations