Assignment 1.2: conflicting viewpoints essay – part ii | PHI 210 Critical Thinking | Strayer University
Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay - Part II
Synthesizing and Writing
Due Week 5 and rate 100 objects
When looking for counsel encircling a object progeny, how frequently do you try to oppose biases toward your own object of examination? This assignment asks you to pledge in this presentation of nice thinking.
The assignment is separated into two (2) space.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you peruse a performance quote encircling nice thinking processes, resurveyed the Procon.org Website in command to gather counsel, and pledged in prewriting to test your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you testd the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.
In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you obtain transcribe a brochure to synthesize your ideas.
Part II - Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page brochure in which you:
- State your collocation on the subject-matter you chosen for Assignment 1.1.
- Identify (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that subsistence your collocation and decipher why you chosen these restricted reasons.
- Explain your answers to the "believing" questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposing your collocation from the Procon.org website.
- Examine at last two (2) types of biases that you slight accustomed as you evaluated the antecedent for and across your collocation.
- Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or bunch identification that may enjoy influenced your biases.
- Discuss whether or not your thinking encircling the subject-matter has modifiable behind generous the "Believing Game," flush if your collocation on the progeny has stayed the corresponding.
The brochure should ensue guidelines for distinct and organized writing:
- Include an initiatory stipulation and ending stipulation.
- Address main ideas in substantiality stipulations after a while a subject-matter judgment and subsistenceing judgments.
- Adhere to trutination rules of English expression, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Your assignment must ensue these formatting requirements:
- This succession requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is unanalogous than other Strayer University successions. Please captivate a consequence to reexamination the SWS documentation for details.
- Based on the guidelines in SWS, "A well-researched assignment has at last as sundry sources as pages." Since this assignment requires you to transcribe at last 3-4 pages, you should include at last 3-4 references.
The restricted succession knowledge outcomes associated after a while this assignment are:
- Identify the inaccurate fallacies, assumptions, and biases concerned in manipulative appeals and abuses of expression.
- Create written performance utilizing the concepts of nice thinking.
- Use technology and counsel media to elimination progenys in nice thinking skills and inaccurate logic.