Product review

1/27/22, 11:38 AM Rubric Assessment – CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online) – Northeastern Illinois University

https://neiu.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=2982504&evalObjectId=163747&evalObjectType=1&us… 1/2

Initial Product Review (M2)
Course: CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online)

Criteria Excellent Good work
Needs some
improvement

Not quite there Criterion Score

Discuss the

good

design

of the product

reviewed.

/ 25

Bad design

example

contrasting

with the good

one, including

explanations.

/ 25

Use the HCI

language

/ 20

Pictures of the

good and bad

design

/ 10

2

5 points

Details of

different aspects

of good design of

the product are

included.

2

0 points

Different aspects

of good design of
the product are

mostly included.

15 points

Different aspects
of good design of
the product are

partially

included.
5 points

Details are vague

or nonexistent.

25 points

A product, in the

same category,

that is

considered a bad

design is

discussed in

detail, in contrast
the good design

features.

18 points

A product, in the
same category,
that is
considered a bad

design is vaguely

discussed, with

little explanation.

1

0 points

A product, in the
same category,
that is

mentioned

without any

details.

0 points

Does not include

a bad design

comparisson.

20 points

Speaks of

affordances and

conventions and

how the

product’s design

influence your

perception.

15 points

HCI language

was using

vaguely or

wrongly.

10 points
HCI language

minimally used.

0 points

Does not

mention any HCI

language.

10 points

Pictures of both

good designs and

competing

products with

worse design are

included.

5 points
Pictures of both

good designs OR

competing
products with

worse design is

included.
0 points

Pictures of good

designs NOR

competing
products with
worse design are
included.
0 points

1/27/22, 11:38 AM Rubric Assessment – CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online) – Northeastern Illinois University

https://neiu.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=2982504&evalObjectId=163747&evalObjectType=1&us… 2/2

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Good work
Needs some
improvement
Not quite there Criterion Score

Writing

(Mechanics)

/ 2020 points

The paper is at

least a page long,

with good

readability, clear,

and concise.

Links to all the

sources of

information were

included.

16 points

The paper is

understandable,

with point of

view or idea but

with

some gaps in

organization and

details OR links

to some of

information

sources were

included.

12 points

The paper is
understandable,

but it is very

brief.

Links to all the
sources of
information were

not included.

0 points

The paper is not

able to be

understood by

others or it is

very brief.

Links to all the
sources of
information were
not included.

Excellent
90 points minimum

Good work
80 points minimum

Needs improvement
70 points minimum

Not quite there
20 points minimum