Assignments
Please create your presentation and submit here. A few points to remember with the submission:
· Review the grading rubric for point allocation
· The presentation time limit is 20 minutes
· The slides should include the Community Assessment Topic Headings (at minimum) noted in your Stanhope and Lancaster textbook and also listed in the Assignment guidelines
· Address in your narrative how the community was chosen as well as how your group approached data collection
· Include a summary/conclusion slide (this is NOT equivalent to the evaluation of goals slide)
· Include a slide (at the end or after the references) that lists/details the role of group members on the project; this is very important as it is likely only one or maybe two group members will record the VT. It is important to note how others contributed
1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health …
https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 1/3
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the
rubric’s layout.
Novice Competent Pro�cient
Assessment overview covering all
the major areas accurately
0 (0.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
Information incomplete/missing;
inadequate evaluation
11 (11.00%) – 20 (20.00%)
Most aspects of the assessment
addressed though not thoroughly
21 (21.00%) – 25 (25.00%)
Assessment is thorough, all aspects
addressed and the audience has a
solid understanding of the community
Community Health Nursing
Diagnosis, priority setting
0 (0.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Community health nursing dx is not
evidenced; medical dx used
5 (5.00%) – 7 (7.00%)
Community health nursing dx
evidenced, moderately supported
with evidence and prioritized
8 (8.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
Community health nursing dx
evidenced and strongly supported
with evidence; appropriately
prioritized
Planning and Goals 0 (0.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Goals are missing numerous elements
of SMART criteria for STG and LTG
5 (5.00%) – 7 (7.00%)
Goals are missing 1-2 elements of
SMART goal criteria for STG and LTG
8 (8.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
All elements of SMART goal criteria
are present for STG and LTG
Name: Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT)
Description: This is the grading rubric for Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT) Assignment. For most of the parts below, this is a
group grade; group member’s grade may vary based on the peer evaluation and posted responses to others on VT. Your work distribution should be
spread equally between members: for those in the group who do not present in the Voice Thread (VT) presentation, they should take the lead in
development of the VT presentation. Remember, you have learned a great deal about your community from this group work, this is the time to share
your expertise and assessment �ndings with your fellow classmates. How you present this information will impact your fellow student’s
comprehension of your community’s needs.
Exit
Grid View List View
1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health …
https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 2/3
Novice Competent Pro�cientInterventions 0 (0.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Interventions do not demonstrate to a
poor relationship to the dx or goals
5 (5.00%) – 7 (7.00%)
Interventions demonstrate a
moderate relationship to the dx and
goals
8 (8.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
Interventions demonstrate a strong
relationship to the dx and goals
Evaluation 0 (0.00%) – 4 (4.00%)
Evaluation present but not related to
goals
5 (5.00%) – 7 (7.00%)
Evaluation present, limited detail and
moderately related to goals
8 (8.00%) – 10 (10.00%)
Evaluation present, detailed and
strongly related to goals
Overall Presentation Using VT 0 (0.00%) – 20 (20.00%)
No evidence provided describing
various group member’s roles on the
project Group members do not
appear knowledgeable about the
community. PPTs with many
formatting errors, no evidence of
original images used on slides (i.e. all
stock images); selected images do not
support/enhance the presentation
and/or are of poor quality (i.e. blurry,
pixelated images, hard to read fonts
and colors, poor audio); missing
citations. Group members so not
appear to know the content/there are
challenges with understanding the
presented content APA
references/citation with numerous
errors.
21 (21.00%) – 28 (28.00%)
Roles of group members on project
are clear and included on PPT slide.
Group members are knowledgeable
about the community; PPTs formatted
correctly (i.e. fonts and colors
compliment topic but are a bit di�cult
to read) with few minor errors;
audience able to follow and
understand presented content; group
has included mostly stock images with
some evidence of original images;
citations present; images relate to and
support presentations APA
references/citation with few minor
errors.
29 (29.00%) – 35 (35.00%)
Roles of group members on project
are clear and included on PPT slide
Group members are very
knowledgeable about the community;
PPTs formatted correctly (i.e. fonts
and colors carefully planned and
enhance readability) with citations;
audience able to follow and
understand presented content; group
has included a majority of original
photos with stock images used to
highlight/compliment the
presentation; images
explain/reinforce content APA
references/citation with no more than
2 errors
Name:Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT)
Description:This is the grading rubric for Community Assessment Presentation via Voice Thread (VT) Assignment. For most of the parts below, this is a
group grade; group member’s grade may vary based on the peer evaluation and posted responses to others on VT. Your work distribution should be
spread equally between members: for those in the group who do not present in the Voice Thread (VT) presentation, they should take the lead in
development of the VT presentation. Remember, you have learned a great deal about your community from this group work, this is the time to share
your expertise and assessment �ndings with your fellow classmates. How you present this information will impact your fellow student’s
comprehension of your community’s needs.
Exit
1/16/22, 5:27 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health …
https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357721_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricId=_84520_1&viewOnly=true&displa… 3/3
1/12/22, 12:21 PM Rubric Detail – 202201_Comm and Public Health …
https://blackboard.gwu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_2357704_1&course_id=_367187_1&maxValue=10.0&rubricId=_84522_1&viewOnly=true&display… 1/1
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the
rubric’s layout.
Novice Competent Pro�cient
Peer Evaluation 0 (0.00%) – 4 (40.00%)
1’s and mostly 2’s noted on the
evaluation
5 (50.00%) – 9 (90.00%)
Mostly 3’s on the evaluation, a few 2’s
10 (100.00%) – 10 (100.00%)
All 3’s on the evaluation
Name: Peer Evaluation – Community Assessment Presentation via VT
Exit
Grid View List View
Name:Peer Evaluation – Community Assessment Presentation via VT
Exit