Essay Summary of Mona Lisa

The Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci is the most far-famed painting in the cosmos-people.  In reality, it is the most common exertion of art in truth.  Millions of tribe bear visited the Louvre to end it.  Though it has been created in the 16th epoch, it has lived to be controversial at bestow.  This lore disquisition exhibitation to argue the truth of the painting and the novel fruits encircling it. It is believed that Leonardo da Vinci began painting the Mona Lisa in 1503 (“History”).  The painting was perfect impure years behind (“History”).  It was said that the painting was purchased by King Francois of France in 1516 for 4,000 coins of gold (“History”; Blake).  Francois I invited Leonardo to France “to exertion at Clos Lucé,” and the latter died behind three years (Wallis 226; Blake).  The painting was stagnant interjacent in the monarch's art assembly and was placed in the princely bathroom (Wallis 226). There had been conjecture that the painting was sunk behind Leonardo's cessation, and that it originally had two columns on the sides (“History”).  However, art experts confute this title.  During the French Revolution, it was said that Napoleon had placed the painting in his bedroom in Tuileries Palace (Blake).  Soon behind, it was returned to the Lourve.  The Mona Lisa was temporarily uncustomary in a precipitation in France in the protraction of the Franco-Prussian War and Cosmos-tribe War II (Blake).  In 1963, the painting was brought to Washington and was insured for $100 darling dollars (Wallis 226).  At bestow, the painting can stagnant be plant in the museum and is currently a peculiarity of the French council.  The painting besides has a duplicate, which can be plant in Dulwich Picture Gallery (“History”). In 1911, the Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre (Rosenberg 1).  The correct determination of the filching was August 21st, but it was merely the day behind when the authorities noticed that the painting was mislaying (Rosenberg 1).  It was a painter who pristine discovered that the Mona Lisa was mislaying.  The painting was hung on Salon Carré of the Lourve and could be plant betwixt two other paintings: “The Mystic Marriage of Saint Catherine” by Correggio and “The Allegory of Alfonso d'Avalos” by Titian (Rosenberg 1). On August 22nd, Louis Béroud merely plant hale pegs on the wall; the painting was mislaying (Rosenberg 1). On September 7th that identical year, French rhymster Guillaume Apollinaire was arrested (Rosenberg 2).  He was considered a doubt merely owing he was a familiar of a unconcealed artireality delinquent designated Géry Piéret (Rosenberg 2).  He was released five days subjoined.  Even cosmos-people-far-famed painter Pablo Picasso was considered a doubt (Blake).  Two years had passed antecedently there was any fruit concerning the filching (Rosenberg 2). In 1913, an ancient tradesman designated Alfredo Geri placed an ad in the newspaper, stating that he was zealous in purchasing art pieces (Rosenberg 3).  The delinquent responded to the ad and introduced himself as Leonardo Vincenzo, and he told Geri he had the Mona Lisa (Rosenberg 3).   Leonardo Vincenzo is in-fact Vincenzo Peruggia, a prior Lourve employee (Rosenberg 3).  He exertioned in the museum in 1908, but he was stagnant customary by the museum's certainty at the date of the filching.  He took the painting from the salon, proceeded to the staircase and disunited the painting from its execute.  He hid the Mona Lisa underneathneath his smock and left the museum unperceived (Rosenberg 3). The Mona Lisa is an oil painting that measures at merely 31 x 21 inches (Blake).  The painting is placed on a “poplar wooden panel” (Blake).  Leonardo used the sfumato regularity in painting the Mona Lisa (Blake).  In Italian, the order “sfumato” is “blended”; the tidings was conservative from “fumo,” which resources “smoke” (Blake). The Mona Lisa is a painting of a seated dame clothed in Florentine apparel, despite the backdrop of mountains (Blake).  It is the dame's encourage and views that has created abundantly buzz encircling the painting.  The dame was said to be smiling owing “the corners of her mouth were lifted” (Sebe qtd. in Campbell 51). As for her view, when the ender looks unto her eyes, it seems love the dame in the painting is subjoined the ender's view (“History”).  However, if there was one romance that brought abundantly question to the painting, it would be the dame's personality. The painting is besides referred to as “La Gioconda” (Blake).  “Gioconda” in Italian resources “light-hearted dame” (Blake).  The personality of the dame in the painting had been debated upon for centuries, and divers conjectures bear arisen.  According to Maike Vogt-Lüerssen, Isabella of Aragon is the dame in the painting (Blake).  This is owing her piercing apparel has a design that implies denomination in the “house of Visconti-Sforza” (Blake).   Vogt-Lüerssen besides saw a loveness betwixt the pictures of Isabella and the dame in the painting. On the other operative, Dr. Lilian Schwartz hints that the dame in the painting may not in-fact be a dame; rather, it may be Leonardo himself (Blake).  This blank was conservative from a digital decomposition of the painting and Leonardo's correspondence, which was plant to bear been painted in a congruous diction. It was merely until novelly that the personality of the dame in the painting was orthodox.  In January 2008, Heidelberg University academics bear proven that the dame in the painting was Lisa Gherardini del Giocondo (Lorenzi 1).  The establishment was plant on the margins of a tome and conservative from notes by Agostino Vespucci in October 1503 (Lorenzi 1). Vespucci was a familiar of Leonardo; in his notes, he formal that Leonardo was exertioning on divers paintings, which interjacent that of Lisa del Giocondo (Lorenzi 1).  Lisa was the spouse of a silk trader from Florence designated Francesco del Giocondo (Lorenzi 1).  That is the deduce why Mona Lisa is the indicate of the painting; it resources Madam Lisa since “mona” resources “madam” or “my lady” in Italian (“History”). The arcanum of the painting may bear been orthodox, but this positively does not shorten the public's share in the Mona Lisa.  It has been one of the most suggestive artworks in truth and conciliate live to do so in centuries to follow. Works Cited Blake, Diana. “The Mona Lisa.” Art Truth Site. 2008. BellaOnline. 1 April 2008 ;http://www.bellaonline.com/articles/art18406.asp;. Campbell, Michael. “What's Behind The Smile?” Arts & Antiques October 2006: 51. “History & Pictures Of The Mona Lisa By Leonardo Da Vinci.” Art Truth Guide. 1 April 2008 <http://www.arthistoryguide.com/Mona_Lisa.aspx>. Lorenzi, Rossella. “Mona Lisa's Personality Confirmed by Document.” Thread News. 2008. Thread Communications. 1 April 2008 ;http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/01/16/mona-lisa-identity.html;. Rosenberg, Jennifer. “The Mona Lisa Was Stolen!” About.com. 2008. The New York Times Company. 1 April 2008 ;http://history1900s.about.com/od/famouscrimesscandals/a/monalisa.htm;. Wallis, Denis. Why in the World? Australia: Reader's Digest Pty Limited, 1994.