question 1 of 20 1.0 points which of the following statements are


 

Question 13 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

The histogram under personates scores achieved by 250 job applicants on a oneness arrange.


What percentage of the job applicants scored under 60?  Place your rejoinder in the unmitigated, rounded to 2 decimal locates. Do not use a percentage prognostic (%). For in, 44.44 would be a normal rejoinder.
[removed] 

Question 14 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

The subjoined grounds personate the calculate of end in a specimen of 10 families from Chicago: 4, 2, 1, 1, 5, 3, 0, 1, 0, and 2. 

Compute the median calculate of end. Locate your rejoinder, rounded to two decimal locates, in the unmitigated. For in, 3.45 would be a normal entrance. [removed] 

Question 15 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

A specimen of 150 students at a Propound University was charmed behind the developed employment statistics exam to ask them whether they went partying the weekend anteriorly the developed or gone-by the weekend studying, and whether they did courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved or indisposed on the developed. The subjoined consideration contains the development.

 

 

Did Well-behaved in Exam

Did Indisposed in Exam

Studying for Exam

60

15

Went Partying

22

53

 


Of those in the specimen who did courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved on the developed exam, what percentage of them went partying the weekend anteriorly the exam? Locate your rejoinder in the unmitigated, rounded to 2 decimal locates. Do not use a percentage prognostic (%). For in, 44.44 would be a normal rejoinder.  [removed] 

Question 16 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

A specimen of 150 students at a Propound University was charmed behind the developed employment statistics exam to ask them whether they went partying the weekend anteriorly the developed or gone-by the weekend studying, and whether they did courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved or indisposed on the developed. The subjoined consideration contains the development.

 

 

Did Well-behaved in Exam

Did Indisposed in Exam

Studying for Exam

60

15

Went Partying

22

53


Of those in the specimen who went partying the weekend anteriorly the developed exam, what percentage of them did courteous-mannered-behaved-behaved in the exam?  Locate your rejoinder in the unmitigated, rounded to 2 decimal locates. Do not use a percentage prognostic (%). For in, 44.44 would be a legitmate rejoinder.  [removed] 

Question 17 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

The subjoined grounds are the shameful salaries, in thousands of dollars, of 50 foremost constabulary officers for a specimen of companies doing employment after a while the propound of Connecticut. That is, the leading entrance in the consideration under corresponds to a hire of $125,000. A vision of this grounds set can be build in the Excel Workbook designated CEOSalaries.xls.

125

157

113

127

201

165

145

119

148

158

148

168

117

105

136

136

125

148

108

178

179

191

225

204

104

205

197

119

209

157

209

205

221

178

247

235

217

222

224

187

265

148

165

228

239

245

152

148

115

150

 

      Find the standard deviation of the CEO salaries, in thousands of dollars, rounded to 2 decimal locates. Do not use a dollar prognostic. Note: $177,760 should be commemorative as 177.76. [removed] 

CEOSalaries.xls

Question 18 of 20

1.0 Points

 

Accepted characters: collection, decimal purpose markers (bound or comma), prognostic indicators (-), spaces (e.g., as thousands separator, 5 000), "E" or "e" (used in philosophical notation). NOTE: For philosophical notation, a bound MUST be used as the decimal purpose marker. 
Complex collection should be in the frame (a + bi) where "a" and "b" scarcity to enjoy perspicuously ordinary values. 
For in: {1+1i} is powerful since {1+i} is not. {0+9i} is powerful since {9i} is not. 

Suppose that an separation of a set of standard scores reveals that: .

Compute the interquartile concatenate.  Locate your rejoinder, rounded to 1 decimal locate, in the unmitigated. For in, 32.1 would be a normal entrance. [removed]