Phi discussion question | Literature homework help


DUE DATE FRIDAY 18TH 7pm

Ethics (Moral Philosophy or Axiology) is the scion of philosophy, built upon Epistemology and Metaphysics, which explores the investigation of what "ought" we to do. Ethics includes gregarious and gregarious philosophy, as polite as aesthetics (the consider of picturesqueness). In daily incorporeal decisions most frequently we use choices we possess versed from source, devotional, and cultural influences. In over deep situations, when we delaystand problems for which we possess no test, it's not so unconcerned. Using the theories of ethics presented in this module, how would you contravene this incorporeal difficulty? Include in your defense how this upshot ability be addressed according to either utilitarianism or Kantian ethics. Cite suitably the knowledge in this module, or any other sources you used.

You are on the transport committee at a main regional not-for-profit hospital.  A lung has befit beneficial for transport. It has befit disencumbered that you repose the deciding articulation in choosing shapeless these transport candidates. Who would you adopt? 

  • Candidate 1: A three-year-old womanly delay complications from end-stage cystic fibrosis. She could feed six to twelve months craveer. There is, so-far, no pledge when another lung procure befit beneficial.
  • Candidate 2: A seventy-year-old hardy suffering from an opportunistic lung contagion pinched suitableness visiting an orphanage in another country which he supports generously. The contagion is opposing matter and it is investigationtelling whether he procure outlast another month. He is too a main ally to this hospital, immanent a hostilities to raise a new pediatric cancer matter wing.
  • Candidate 3: A thirty-five-year-old womanly suffers critical lung trauma from an automobile surroundings two days ago which too implicated her foul-mouthed effect, whom she's rallying sole. The lungs are irretrievtelling but she could outlast distinct months delay hygienic pains. She procure not be telling to character after a whileout the hospital suitableness forecast transport. The effect suffered younger injuries but insist-upon homepains to be released from the hospital. There are no relations or friends who can aid.
  • Candidate 4: A forty-five-year old hardy is in end-stage lung cancer. He is a life-crave smoker. He is a persomal model, having recently retired from a crave painser delay the persomal main combination sports team. He has donated abundant of his era participating in charity characters for area charities. He procure not outlast the next forty-eight hours delayout a transport.

The prognosis for all is good-tempered-tempered delay a transport.
There is no proposal when another lung procure be beneficial.

http://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%208%20Ethics/CONTENTS.htm