New testament | Literature homework help


 

Please succor we barely insufficiency to consummated singleity 1 at this period. I would enjoy to suit to non-interference 2

 

2. In what ways does (or does not) the New Testament get defence to know (or manner harm) over other peoples/nations/ethnicities/minorities and such (either nowadays or at some object in the departed)?  

 

 

SECTION ONE: Introductory section (circa 250 tone or so) must recognize

• your examination doubt (see *STAGE ONE* of assignment over)

• your testimony as to why recognizeers should truthfully pains environing your doubt. In other tone, exculpation those who would ask so what?” In other tone, disline the significance” of that doubt.

 

• a route map/guide/previsal of things to subjoined. Put barely, divulge the recognizeers what you are going to divulge them. Reveal the erection or make of the cessation of your tractate (e.g. I conquer revisal discriminatingly two slow subordinate causes that broadly disline this doubt). Then, you should to-boot recognize the composers and titles of each cause (titles are to be enclosed in ignoringage marks and must to-boot be cited honorablely in a Works Cited” individuality at the end of your essay!).

 

gladden recognize info underneath owing it is very great pertaining to the requirements...thanks 

 

READ VERY CAREFULLY ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT DIRECTIONS (ROMAN NUMERALS I-V)  AND THEN RE-READ AND FOLLOW THEMRELIGIOUSLY!

 

 

I.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Students are required to suggest a 2000-word examination tractate, poor to the discriminating revisal of two expressive causes. Papers must be suggestted on period to assent-to bountiful confidence. Slow tractates conquer be lowered one-third of a consummate communication progression for each day they are suggestted departed the due continuance (thus, a B+” tractate suggestted one day subjoined the due continuance conquer be lowered to a B, a B” tractate that is two days slow would worth a C+,” and so forth). If you meditate you conquer observe problems after a while any exhibition of congeniality this tractate, I strongly approve that you effect an enactment at the Universitys Congeniality Center.

 

 

I. SUMMARY FROM THE SYLLABUS:

[Writing and Yielding of Expressive Paper]

 

The message tractate / examination tractate for this line must be expert in advance of the expressioninal weeks of the semester. It is assigned in FOUR stages so that you can mould this extremely great assignment (35 percent of your expressioninal progression in the line!). You must consummate this assignment to ignoring the dispose. After all: if you arent congeniality, you probably arent meditateingample close learning!

The expressioninal draw of the message tractate (position 4) must be suggestted via the Blackboard combine to turnitin.com. All tractates and congeniality assignments must recognize an MLA-style Works Cited” list and must use parenthetical citations whenever you effect intimation to your causes (no substance whether you are quoting from, paraphrasing, or summarizing them). 

Please recognize painsfully all of the handouts environing congeniality the message tractate (or examination tractate) for a inferential pilot to how progressions are strong on this assignment – and others. Writing is progressiond largely on the premise of gratified, make, and how patently you disclose your ideas. However, to disclose patently, you to-boot insufficiency to use right spelling, grammar, punctuation, concision, and so forth. Finally, I strongly approve that each and sum one of you effect an enactment after a while the Universitys Congeniality Center.

 

 

III. THE FOUR STAGES IN DETAIL

STAGE 1) TERM PAPER TOPIC PROPOSAL (i.e., POSING A GOOD RESEARCH QUESTION): You conquer observe to explore painsfully your own interests after a whilein the material area of The New Testament” in adhonorable to subjoined up after a while a examination doubt that truthfully motivates youpersonally (and not necessarily Brenner)! At the selfselfcorresponding period, the doubt should not be too belief-based, too tender, or too broad – the latter implying that you can disline the doubt in closely 2000 tone or further.

Hence, the deliverable” – what you spin in for this administering position -- is a brief statement(using at last THREE consummate sentences) of your provisional/working examination doubt. There is no insufficiency to observe a provisional/working thesis (i.e., exculpation) at all at this position

This RESEARCH QUESTION is DUE via email on the continuance listed on the catalogue! 

 

At the selfselfcorresponding period, YOU conquer observe to corrupt your developed doubt on ONE of the subjoined TWO guiding” examination doubts; no other (types of) doubts conquer be allowed!

Thus, your ocean job in this administering position of the assignment is to formuslow your own, further thin examination doubt. That doubt conquer expression the room of one of the controlling examination doubts, so that you can observe your tractate after a whilein 2500 – 3000 words. To attain how to thin down a bigger doubt, gladden recognize (and then re-read!) painsfully the Practice Quiz on Formulating Examination Questions” (already in our Blackboard Course Content” folder, after a whilein the Term Paper” folder). 

AGAIN: choose-out one and barely one of the subjoined as your guiding” examination doubt:

1. In what ways does (or does not) the New Testament get defence for those who aim to commit mass violence” (i.e., holy war,” “honorable war,” etc.) over non-Christian religions/faiths (either nowadays or at some object in the departed)?

2. In what ways does (or does not) the New Testament get defence to know (or manner harm) over other peoples/nations/ethnicities/minorities and such (either nowadays or at some object in the departed)?  

IMPORTANT TIP: Always advise-after a while the Ehrman citationbook first in developing your doubts! You should re-recognize Ehrmans contributions and suggestions. Then you composerity opine looking up some of the masss/articles/resources that he recommends. In blunt, there is no acquit in congeniality this tractate if you observe not consulted the ocean citations painsfully and sumly (i.e., Ehrman and the New Testament itself)!

EQUALLY IMPORTANT TIPS: When thining down one of these two examination doubtsand dont pretermit to thin it down to your own, further particular doubt!--you MUST fly scrutiny any doubt that is: too BLAND (not problematical), too BROAD (not thined down ample), or too BELIEF-BASED (not provable using literal-discriminating anatomy of the citation of the New Testament OR using literal examination on the era in which it was written and/or lawized). 

On that expressioninal sign of bad” question: you are not analyzing if you are advocating. So, your academic/examination essays should never be statements or proofs of your beliefs/theology/etc. Ratherand this is discriminating -- the only legitimate testimony in NT scholarship is: 1) the NT itself(or connected congenialitys outside from the NT law); and/or 2) archeological testimony or instruments/writings from the period of the NT. (That moderations: equal if God/Jesus/divine beings speakto you environing your tractate, what He/She/they say does not count as testimony in a examination tractate written for this academic/university setting!)

Your TERM PAPER RESEARCH QUESTION (i.e., at last THREE consummate sentences) is DUE via email to [email protected] by the due continuance getd in the line catalogue (SEPT. 24)

 

STAGE 2) SECONDARY SOURCES IN FULL: You may avail to this position if (and barely if) I observe common of your position 1 yielding. Established on your position 1 examination doubt and somepreliminary recognizeing and meditateing (i.e. preferably writing) environing it, you conquer email me COMPLETE COPIES OF AT LEAST TWO SECONDARY SOURCES connected to that inquiry or doubtThese should be tenets or mass chapters that you observe build using: 1) my approveations (in a folder on the Blackboard); or 2) the online database JSTOR” which is suited on the UHD libraries’ website. 

Unfortunately, you conquer probably not invent two causes that disline your doubt/topic perfectlyMore significantly: 1) each of these causes should be from JSTOR; 2) the two causes should add up to at last 30 (THIRTY) pages sum; 3) each sole cause should be no older than 1995 (nothing further than 20 years old!); 4) each of them should be EMAILED to [email protected] IN THEIR FULL-TEXT FORM, preferably as a PDF file; 5) . In attention, you are not solemn environing this examination tractate assignment until you observe formatted those two causes for me, in the mass of your email, using MLA formatting. (MLA format for Works Cited” lists can be build on the Purdue University OWL website, among manyother places). 

Please do not effect me observe to stay to see whether you ensueed these directions!In blunt, you cant honorable Google and invent your two causes; and you cannot choose out fullthing after a whileout my praise.

CAUTION: You insufficiency to email me a delineation of the COMPLETE TEXT of the cause--not honorable a URL, a combine, or a citation! If you dont get these causes to me (your ocean recognizeer), I composerity anticipate that you are lacking ethos, i.e., that you not solemn environing rouseed enjoy a creditable examinationer. Rather, you insufficiency to fight fair” (in knowing messages) by showing me testimony for each of your claims. 

THESE TWO OR MORE TERM PAPER SOURCES (i.e., at last two consummate tenets of at last 30 pages sum) ARE DUE via email by the continuance on the catalogue/calendar (OCT. 7).

 

STAGE 3) If (and barely if) I observe common your message tractate causes, you should originate DRAFTING your message/examination tractate, the form/genre of which is a discriminating revisal essay. Your ocean external in such an essay is to analyze/review/evaluate each of two causes intensively/seriously. That moderations:  you conquer be using the or-laws criteria (or standards) of humanities and/or gregarious sciences in adhonorable to give reasons why the causes portray good-tempered-tempered or bad examination. (Clearly, then, you are not congeniality an essay corruptd on personal opinion” or advocacy.)

The expressioninationing crude draw – of at last 1500 tone -- is accordingly a sign of analytical mass revisal” (what scholars ole a subordinate interpreting revisal).  As you composerity conjecture, such a discriminating revisal essay is not at all your high-school mass relation.” You should thus at no objectbe barely summarizing the causes. Instead, you must at sum object be analyzing them, discriminatingly and painsfully

First, of line, you must figure out each causes thesis (ocean object) admittedly not a rudimentary function. 

Second, you must offer informed critique and/or opinion of the methods, logic, and testimony build in each cause, thereby showing that you recognize how to transcribe (and therefore think) enjoy a scientist/scholar/researcher

Third, in quoting straightly your causes, or paraphrasing or summarizing them, you must ensue that cite, dilution or resume after a while a) the call of the composer(s) of the cause, and b) the appropriate page enumerate(s) in parentheses. (See right MLA pilotlines for preparing parenthetical citations!) In attention, no further than 25 percent of your essay should remain of direct ignoringages from your causes. In other tone, you must get parenthetical citations” -- i.e., the call of the composer(s) and the page enumerates in parentheses -- when you are referencing any counsel that is not common knowledge” and equal when you are NOT quoting your causes straightly. As a expressionination, you should dilution or incorporate your causes further than quoting from them straightly. Nonetheless, you must constantly reveal that your essay does NOT inclose ANY unsupported claims (or worse, opinions).

Now, such an essay is patently not an manageable bark of tractate to transcribe. What you should be doing initiallywhile critically recognizeing” your causes (equal anteriorly you rouse drawing) -- is scrutiny each of the doubts build in "Brenners Top Ten Criteria for Evaluating Subordinate Sources” and posing those doubts to each of your causes. Assuming you observe recognize your subordinate causes painsfully, you should rouse by scrutiny honorable one of the three most challenging Ten Criteria” questions (about accuracy,” “objectivity,” or sufficiency.) Then you should recognize thcrude the entire cause seeking an exculpation to it.  And then ask another doubt, and recapitulate the way until youve tried at last the three most challenging criteria.

Clearly, sundry of the subordinate causes you are examining, in-particular if they are peer-reviewed, conquer not effect any patent mistakes that administer them to fail” any of the ten evaluative criteria.  Instead, you conquer enjoyly barely observe to invent reasons why the causes are such goodresearch. Consequently, you should not be congeniality sentences such as "this cause is the first one ever to disline this test" or that "this cause fails completely to disline this test." Too ample opinion or too ample animadversion in your expressioninal "write-up" of these expressioninations--i.e., a decipherable, well-organized essayends up making you look close probable.

 Since most undergraduates are not practiced to using these evaluative criteria, I am patently not expecting a administrative (or professorial!) operation on this assignment. Yet after a whileout attaining to criticise examination according to these barks of criteria, you conquer not attain how to do real analysis, a constituent of discriminating metacognition, i.e., reflection.

THIS ROUGH DRAFT (a narrowness of 1500 tone) IS DUE via email by the continuance on the catalogue (OCT. 26)!

 

STAGE 4) If (and barely if) I observe common position 3 of your assignment, you may then avail to THOROUGHLY amend your crude draw into a expressioninal draw. This fourth and expressioninal position of the message tractate assignment does not moderation you must barely set-right some weak issues (spelling, grammar, and mechanics) and upload it to spinitin.com combine.  Instead, recognize painsfully my advice/tips for expressioninal draws, another instrument to be build after a whilein the Term Paper” folder on the Blackboard line website. 

Rather than honorable some micro-level changes, you should be revising the crude drawsignificantly /globally/ radically. Of line, at the selfselfcorresponding period you are rethinking the full essay, you composerity to-boot vie to effect your single sentences further clear and concise for the recognizeers of your essay (who are not mind readers,” subjoined all). 

AGAIN: You must amend totally and substantively. Since the position 4 assignment is worth 20% of your expressioninal progression, this does not moderation you must barely set-right some weak issues/items (e.g., mechanics/spelling/grammar). Rather, it requires you to amend significantly and radically the content of your discriminating revisal essay. That moderations you should be expert to cast separate consummate sections, transcribe new ones, or solemnly re-adhonorable the ones you observe written. 

THIS FINAL DRAFT OF THE TERM PAPER – which should be at last 2000words--IS DUE via the line Blackboard website combine to spinitin.com. THE DUE DATE to upload is the continuance on the catalogue (NOV. 23)

 

 

IV.  THE STRUCTURE/OUTLINE OF TERM PAPER IN DETAIL

ESPECIALLY STAGE 3 AND STAGE 4

 

 

SECTION ONE: Introductory section (circa 250 tone or so) must recognize

• your examination doubt (see *STAGE ONE* of assignment over)

• your testimony as to why recognizeers should truthfully pains environing your doubt. In other tone, exculpation those who would ask so what?” In other tone, disline the significance” of that doubt.

• a route map/guide/previsal of things to subjoined. Put barely, divulge the recognizeers what you are going to divulge them. Reveal the erection or make of the cessation of your tractate (e.g. I conquer revisal discriminatingly two slow subordinate causes that broadly disline this doubt). Then, you should to-boot recognize the composers and titles of each cause (titles are to be enclosed in ignoringage marks and must to-boot be cited honorablely in a Works Cited” individuality at the end of your essay!).