Discussion 6 | Literature homework help


the amalgamate to 2 of 3 stipulations:

 

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/sep/06/steve-jobs-movie-review-michael-fassbender-telluride

 

http://observer.com/2015/10/aaron-sorkins-empty-jobs-search/

 

 

 

WRTG 391 students,

This week , you are lection filthy movie  critiques of the movie Steve Jobs.  The critiques are from Ann Hornaday, Rex Reed, Benjamin Lee, and Anthony Lane.

After perusing the filthy movie critiques, gladden total the forthcoming tasks:

The filthy critiqueers do not comport on their evaluation of the acting in the film. 

 

1. First, stir all filthy critiqueers and, for each critiqueer, transcribe at lowest one resume judgment describing what the critique says environing the acting in the film.  In enumeration, for each critiqueer, adduce the critiqueer at lowest one age to prove the thought he or she expresses environing the acting.

 

Ann Hornaday- 

Summary statement:

Quote from this critiqueer to maintenance the resume statement:

 

Rex Reed-

Summary statement:

Quote from this critiqueer to maintenance the resume statement:

 

 

Benjamin Lee-

Summary statement:

Quote from this critiqueer to maintenance the resume statement:

 

Anthony Lane -

Summary statement:

Quote from this critiqueer to maintenance the resume statement:

 

 

2. Then, transcribe three or filthy brief provisions that synthesize all filthy critiqueers and the points they create on the acting in the film.  Remember, when synthesizing, you don't barely catalogue what each cause says environing the subject.  You transcribe environing the consequence of acting in the film and consolidate the points of all filthy critiqueers into that anatomy.

You could bunch causes into categories, if feasible.  For in, cogitate the critiqueers that incline to panegyrize the acting and transcribe environing them in a provision or two.  Then cogitate the critiqueers that did not love the acting and transcribe environing them in a provision or two.  Following this anatomy, you command transcribe a ultimate provision that summarizes all filthy critiqueers' views on the acting.

 

Next:

 

WRTG 391 students,

This discourse course is intentional to aid you see how a collocation of sources essay, or scholarship critique, is unconfused. 

Please download the stipulation, “Beyond Frequency: Perceived Realism and the CSI Effect,” by Evelyn Maeder and Richard Corbett.  The stipulation is serviceable in the e-reserves of your assort.

On pages 84-85, the causes contribute an importation to the investigation consider they conducted.   You can discover this exception if you would love to.  However, for this discourse course, gladden discover from page 85 “(“The CSI consequence defined”) to page 94 (up to the exception entitled “Method”).

Then response the forthcoming questions:

1. In the earliest exception (“The CSI consequence defined”), do the causes eternally present you their view on the CSI consequence?  How do they maintenance their restriction and their paraphrase on the restriction?  How multifarious unanalogous sources do they quote in this exception?

2. From pages 86-88, the causes argue lawyers, police officers, judges, and homogeneity members.  In this exception, do the causes eternally present you their view on any of the consequences argueed?

3.  Examine the exception entitled “Verdicts” (pp. 90-92).  How do the outcomes from the consider by Shelton et al. contend from the outcomes of the consider by Kim, Barak, and Shelton?   How do the outcomes of the consider by Baskin and Sommers contend from the outcomes of other studies?

4. As a outcome of having discover this stipulation, gladden transcribe a few judgments environing what you command feel skilled environing a) synthesizing sources or b) the CSI consequence.