|
NM 480: Case Study Rubric |
|||||
|
Criteria |
16-20 points |
12-15 points |
8-11 points |
4-7 points |
0-3 points |
|
Organization |
All questions answered with information organized in logical sequence |
All questions answered with information generally organized in logical sequence |
All questions answered and information intermittently organized |
All questions answered but information disorganized |
All questions not addressed |
|
Analysis and Evaluation |
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of issue; Support analysis with at least one scholarly source |
Presents a thorough analysis of issue; Support analysis with at least one scholarly source |
Presents an incomplete analysis of issue by failure to address one aspect: No scholarly support of analysis |
Presents an incomplete analysis of issue by failure to address multiple aspects; No scholarly support of analysis |
Presents a superficial analysis of issue; No scholarly support of analysis |
|
Conclusion and recommendation |
Effective recommendation or solution aligned with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution loosely aligned with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution does not align with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution does not align with the analysis and is unrealistic |
No recommendation or solution offered |
|
Writing Mechanics and Formatting |
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness, and correctness. Current APA formatting used and free of grammar and spelling errors |
Majority of information is clear with some questions left to reader interpretation. APA with 1-3 grammar and spelling errors |
Sentence structure proper but paragraph is disorganized. APA with 4-5 grammar and spelling errors |
Poorly organized and does not follow proper sentence structure. APA with greater than 5 grammar and spelling errors |
Unfocused and rambling. Not in current APA format |
|
NM 480: Case Study Rubric |
|||||
|
Criteria |
16-20 points |
12-15 points |
8-11 points |
4-7 points |
0-3 points |
|
Organization |
All questions answered with information organized in logical sequence |
All questions answered with information generally organized in logical sequence |
All questions answered and information intermittently organized |
All questions answered but information disorganized |
All questions not addressed |
|
Analysis and Evaluation |
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of issue; Support analysis with at least one scholarly source |
Presents a thorough analysis of issue; Support analysis with at least one scholarly source |
Presents an incomplete analysis of issue by failure to address one aspect: No scholarly support of analysis |
Presents an incomplete analysis of issue by failure to address multiple aspects; No scholarly support of analysis |
Presents a superficial analysis of issue; No scholarly support of analysis |
|
Conclusion and recommendation |
Effective recommendation or solution aligned with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution loosely aligned with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution does not align with the analysis |
Recommendation or solution does not align with the analysis and is unrealistic |
No recommendation or solution offered |
|
Writing Mechanics and Formatting |
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness, and correctness. Current APA formatting used and free of grammar and spelling errors |
Majority of information is clear with some questions left to reader interpretation. APA with 1-3 grammar and spelling errors |
Sentence structure proper but paragraph is disorganized. APA with 4-5 grammar and spelling errors |
Poorly organized and does not follow proper sentence structure. APA with greater than 5 grammar and spelling errors |
Unfocused and rambling. Not in current APA format |
Instructions
· Please answer all questions associated with the case study as thoroughly as you can.
· Please use at least 2 references when responding to the Case Study unless otherwise noted.
· There is no particular length requirement as long as you answer the questions thoroughly and use a reference(s) to support your responses.
· Use the most current APA edition when writing and referencing.
· Please proofread your papers.
Janice Menovich, a nurse manager on an oncology unit, is trying to increase the skill mix from 50% registered nurses (RNs) to 62% RNs. Nurse Menovich believes that it is essential to have a high percentage of RNs because of the chemotherapy administered on this unit. Jessie Salee, a nurse manager on a surgical unit, is also trying to increase the skill mix of RNs from 50% to 55%. Nurse Salee believes that this change should be supported because of the increasing acuity levels and decreasing amount of time in the PACU, especially on the 3-11 PM shift.
The vice-president of nursing has announced that there will be a small increase in RN positions (approximately five new RN positions) and that she would like proposals from the managers on how to allocate the scarce resources in the best possible way. Nurse Menovich decides that she needs all five positions and writes up a detailed report, which she gives to the vice president of nursing. She makes an appointment with the vice president of nursing to follow up on the memorandum. The vice president of nursing asks Nurse Menovich whether she can negotiate for fewer RN positions so that Nurse Salee’s unit also can be allocated new positions. Nurse Menovich states that she can prove why she needs the RN positions more than Nurse Salee and that she will do what it takes to obtain the positions for her unit.
· Which type of conflict is described in this case study?
· What conflict management strategy or mode is Nurse Menovich using to get all of the RN positions?
· What conflict management strategy or mode is Nurse Salee using to get all of the RN positions?
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
