Assignment 2: analysis on food security | Solutions to global issues


 

Assignment 2: Disindividuality on Patronage Security

Due Week 7 and merit 110 points

The components of the United Nations ground excellent esteem in the disindividuality you granted on the justty of global warming that termination from population educement. They are now exploration you transcribe an appended disindividuality to comprise advance manifestations akin to population educement. Here is the manifestation they bear asked you to consider:

The component states of the United Nations follow to institute patronage systems that can collect global patronage protection which achieve heal totalone, totalwhere, total day by neat patronage virtue though the furtherance of talented and nutritional agricultural usages. The probing manifestation is not the after a whiledrawal of patronage in the cosmos-vulgar but the admittance to that patronage. In frequent educeing countries, patronage shortages are due to governmental administer aggravate patronage arrangement. These governments tend administer of the population and their dominion by limiting admittance to beneficial patronage to incontrovertible groups. In this usage, they thereby "weaponize" patronage.

Your second purpose as a consultant for the United Nations is to educe an disindividuality that haranguees three manifestations akin to global patronage inprotection caused by global population educement and need, and to search these manifestations in a educeing state of your choosing.

The UN has fond you the aftercited guidelines.

Content

The UN has asked that your pamphlet comprehend three individualitys. Each individuality should be one page (or approximately 300 vernacular) in tediousness and retort particular investigations, attested in the sketch adown. It so asks that you use examples from your educeing state when retorting the investigations.

Introduction

Provide an insertion of half a page stint that haranguees points a-e adown.

  1. Explains the height the UN has asked you to harangue in your own vernacular;
  2. Identifies the three individualitys your pamphlet achieve secrete;
  3. Identifies the educeing state you achieve consider;
  4. Tells the UN the causes of patronage distrust; and
  5. Provides a one-sentence declaration of your solutions at the end of your insertion stipulation.

Section I. Background

  1. What is patronage distrust?
  2. What role does population educement dramatize in patronage protection?

Section II. Technologies That Can Impoverish Yearn and Reform Patronage Security

  1. What forms of technology can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection?
  2. How would these technological solutions achievement?
  3. What causes of patronage inprotection do these technologies harangue?

Section III. Particular Factors in Chosen Developing Country

  1. Considering the causes of patronage distrust, what factors stop the career of patronage from the cause to the vulgar in the educeing state you chosen?

            Conclusion

  • Provide a blank of half a page stint that comprises a epitome of your experienceings that the United Nations can use to notify advenient prudence decisions.

Success Tips

  • In retorting each investigation, use examples from your educeing state to image your points.
  • The UN needs axioms and extrinsic disindividuality on which to sordid advenient prudence decisions; elude single theory and reach infallible your retorts are sordidd on notifyation you experience through examination.

Formatting Requirements

  • Make infallible your pamphlet consists of four to six pages of full (or 1,200 vernacular stint, not including the caggravate or regard pages).
  • Create headings for each individuality of your pamphlet as follows:
    • Section I. Background
    • Section II. Technologies That Can Impoverish Yearn and Reform Patronage Security
    • Section III. Specific Factors in Chosen Developing Country
  • Use and indicate at lowest five probable causes in your examination. A roll of immanent media is advantageous adown.
  • Make infallible your pamphlet comprehends twain in-text extracts and a cause roll, per SWS guidelines: Refer to the Strayer Match Standards (SWS) instrument for regard.
  • Include a caggravate page after a while your indicate, the state you chosen, the duration you submitted the pamphlet, and your instructor’s indicate.

Potential Sources

  1. Peter Timmer. May/June 2015. Patronage Protection and Scarcity: Why Ending Yearn Is So Hard. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/food-security-and-scarcity-why-ending-hunger-so-hard
  2. The United Nations Population Division. 2017. Cosmos-vulgar Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-the-2017-revision.html
  3. Will Martin. November 5, 2010. Patronage Protection and Poverty: A Precarious Balance. Let's Talk Development blog by The Cosmos-vulgar Bank. http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/food-security-and-poverty-a-precarious-balance

The particular race literature effect associated after a while this assignment is as follows:

  • Propose a intent to harangue the manifestation of global patronage protection in underdeveloped countries that considers the application of preceding solutions.

Grading for this assignment achieve be sordidd on retort virtue, logic/organization of the pamphlet, and vernacular and match skills, using the aftercited rubric:

Points: 110

Assignment 2: Disindividuality on Patronage Security

Criteria

Exemplary

90–100% A

Proficient

80–89% B

Fair

70–79% C

Meets Stint Expectations
60–69% D

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Defined patronage inprotection and harangueed its junction to population educement.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in elucidateing the junction among patronage inprotection and population educement.

Proficiently elucidateed the junction among patronage inprotection and population educement.

Defined patronage inprotection and population educement but did not equally elucidate the junction among the two.

Defined patronage inprotection and population educement but did not elucidate the junction among the two.

Did not specify or incorporate patronage inprotection or population educement.

Explained other manifestations that are legitimate for patronage inprotection in a particular educeing state.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in elucidateing manifestations that are legitimate for patronage inprotection in a particular educeing state.

Proficiently elucidateed manifestations that are legitimate for patronage inprotection in a particular educeing state.

Explained manifestations that are legitimate for patronage inprotection but did not detail them to a particular educeing state.

Defined manifestations that are legitimate for patronage inprotection but did not detail them to a particular educeing state.

Did not elucidate manifestations akin to patronage inprotection as it details to a particular educeing state.

Explained the forms of technology that can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in elucidateing how technology can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection.

Proficiently elucidateed how technology can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection.

Explained how technology can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection.

Listed forms of technology that can be used to impoverish yearn and reform patronage protection but did not elucidate how they can do so.

Did not roll or elucidate how forms of technology can be used to impoverish yearn or reform patronage protection.

Included an fissure stipulation and a blank for this individuality of the pamphlet.

Weight: 20%

Included a well-thought-out fissure declaration and a blank.

Included a equal fissure and a blank.

Did not equally comprise either an fissure declaration or a blank.

Missed match either an fissure declaration or a blank.

Both the fissure stipulation and blank are mislaying.

Clarity, match mechanics, and formatting.

Weight: 15%

0-2 errors offer.

3-4 errors offer.

5-6 errors offer.

7-8 errors offer.

More than 8 errors offer.

Met the stint capability of five probable causes/citations.

Weight: 5%

Met stint probable cause and just extract capability.

Used 4 probable causes, after a while few extract errors.

Used at lowest 3 probable causes and justly indicated causes.

Used at lowest 2 causes but did not justly indicate causes.

Used 1 or fewer causes.