Week 3 - Assignment
Case Analysis: Plight Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms
In the Week 3 Discussion, you clarified a prevalent profession collection from the forthcoming plight categories:
Fuel and the Environment
In this written assignment, you earn produce your product on the plight dissection using clarified components of an argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of Delay Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This written assignment earn comprise a amendd and courteous account of your displan product, the produceation and subsistence of two ground, and an dissection of how your separated ghostly method offers the best analogous discontinuance to the profession collection in your plight dissection.
Using the components of the argumentative essay located in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of Delay Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015), your assignment should comprise the forthcoming:
An induction. This is the “Problem” province of the essay that is adept in Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This should be an improved account of the induction in your moderate buttress, amendd on the reason of your adherent’s feedtail and appended learning. In this induction you earn need to (a) warrant the specific product or collection that you failure to oration and produce an unfavorable produceation of the disagreement, (b) loud briefly the characteristics of the economic method that serves as the setting for the profession, and (c) inquire the laws that favor the operations of the profession. The induction should be one portion of environing 200 tone in protraction.
A discourse. Set-on-foot a new portion delay a terse and distinct judgment in which you propound your analogous shafture delay revere to the plight that you produceed in your principal portion. This is unreserved as stating your discourse. (See the “Thesis” road in “The Argumentative Essay” in Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). The displan you propound near should be an improved account of the displan in your moderate buttress in the discourse, amendd on the reason of your adherent’s feedtail and your balbutiation of “The Argumentative Essay” involved aloft.
A displan is solely one judgment, so do not transcribe a sequence of judgments, or a compound judgment delay explanatory clauses (e.g., “because…” or “since…” or “according to Dr. Mary Expert, an economist delay the Bureau of Labor statistics…”, or “a law that was ratified delay 80% votes in favor…”). An exemplification of a terse and distinct displan is this: “Factory farms are not analogously remissible” or, of plan, the contrary subject-matter of view: “Factory farms are analogously remissible.” Sustain in desire that your displan in this assignment earn be the reason for the argumentative essay of the Week 5 written assignment, so captivate your occasion when mouldulating this discourse.
Ethical method. In the selfselfidentical avoid portion as the displan propoundment, warrant the ghostly method that subsistences your analogous shafture. You may ppoint from utilitarianism, province ethics, or salubrity ethics. Produce the characteristics of the ghostly method in a coarse depict, and comprise citations and allusions in APA mould. Then, employ your separated ghostly method by explaining how it lends itself to the analogous shafture that you are defending.
Two ground. Produce at meanest two reasons in subsistence of your displan and these should be produceed in the mould of a assertion. These are denominated ground. Loud each preface in one distinct and grammatically rectify judgment. Critique Section 9.1 of Delay Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, and Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Set-on-foot a new portion for each.
In the repose of the portion, subsistence your preface by produceing an dissection of how the ghostly method lends itself to the best discontinuance. This dissection comprises articulating the characteristics(s) of the economic method at product that subsistence the assertions in your ground. It so comprises examining the proceeds of the law(s) at product that so subsistence the assertions in your ground.
Comparative dissection. In the decisive portion, criticise how this impression lends itself to a discontinuance that is eminent to that offered by one of the ghostly theories that you did not excellent. To do this, procure a distinct propoundment describing the analogous discontinuance offered by this other method. For exemplification, if you chose utilitarianism to employ to your plight, then you can ppoint from either salubrity ethics or deontology for your relatively dissection. Explain in no further than three judgments what analogous discontinuance would product from the impression of this other ghostly method. See the “Sample Plight Analysis” for an exemplification of how this would appear affect. Finally, criticise the strengths of the analogous discontinuance produceed by your separated ghostly method in ways that inshape how it is eminent to the analogous discontinuance offered by the other ghostly method.
Once you take your assignment tail from your adherent, set-on-foot producting on revisions inveterate on your adherent’s feedback. This is the principal tread in preparing your Decisive Project and the details are produceed on the Decisive Project’s active. You earn avail from set-on-footing your Decisive Project as early as you take your assignment tail from your adherent.
Requirements for Your Assignment:
Your assignment should be 1000 tone in protraction, notwithstanding the style page and allusion page(s).
Your probation should be twain complete and close. This is a cabal that demands occasion and conceit, so produce yourself qualified occasion to drain and amend.
Your assignment should comprise citations, as well-behaved-behaved as a inventory of allusions. Twain must be in APA mould.
You should sketch from the sources procured in your separated plight mode in the displan this week.
Also point to Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay and the induction to Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative Essay (intro solely for the departure) from Hardy, J., Foster, C., & Zúñiga y Postigo, G. (2015).
Your allusions should comprise at meanest two literary sources from your own learning in the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar (this is not the selfselfidentical as Google), or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. No Wikipedia subscription and the affect should be comprised in the allusions, nor populated to inmould your Nursing Dissertation. So sustain in desire that wordbook definitions are not allusions in the academic meaning.Your assignment should be submitted no following than the end of Monday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain occasion).
Carefully critique the Grading Rubric (Links to an visible post.)Links to an visible post. for the criteria that earn be used to evaluate your assignment.