Compare the rise to power, the rule and the legacy of two different emperors. Describe some of the broader qualities of and key people within the dynasties in which they ruled. Draw explicit comparisons to the current rule of Xi Jinping

 Compare the flow to faculty, the government and the grant of two contrariant emperors. Describe some of the broader qualities of and key vulgar amid the dynasties in which they governmentd. Draw manifest similitudes to the vulgar government of Xi Jinping    Grading Rubric Organization and Clarity Very High- Paper demonstrates pointed and agreeing letter. Transitions among ideas are handled polite. Formatting is misspend and letter is munificent of language and spelling errors. Good- Paper is polite systematic and pure. Language or spelling errors are minor Adequate - Paper is slightly systematic and pure. Errors do not overly vilify from overall ideas. Could bear used rectify transitions among ideas. Language or spelling errors propose further editing would bear helped. Needs Improvement - Letter needs delayout patronage. The main ideas are getting past accordingly of the language and spelling errors. Fail-  Issue Identification Very High- Presents an deferential and elaborate cognomen of a multiformity of problems and opportunities that are compelling and insightful. Good – Most Greater issues are attested and there is some indication of ideas, which are explored in famous detail Adequate – Some greater issues are attested and extendedly discussed. Needs Improvement - One or two greater ideas are attested, but there is singly a deportment dismode of these greater ideas occurs. Fail -  Issue Analysis Very High - Presents an insightful and thoroughgoinggoing decomposition of all attested issues. Includes all essential points of similitude. Good - Presents animated decomposition of some the issues attested, evidencing some considerable points of similitude. Adequate- Presents an extended decomposition of a few of the issues attested, but lacks profundity in some areas. Is damage a sum of essential points of similitude. Needs Improvement - The plane of decomposition could use rectify framing and further profundity. Factual patronage for the decomposition is omitted. Fail - Use of mode concepts Very High - Demonstrates full order of tools and concepts from the mode. Makes misspend and facultyful connections among attested issues and the strategic concepts thought-out in the mode readings and rank lectures. Good – Evidences fortified ability of some tools and concepts from the mode as polite as a public quickness delay other embodied. Makes substantial connections among attested issues and the strategic concepts thought-out in the mode readings and rank lectures. Adequate - Demonstrates enough order of tools and concepts from the mode. Makes some connections among attested issues and the strategic concepts thought-out in the mode readings and rank lectures but leaves other considerable areas unexplored. Needs Improvement - Makes singly a few, if any, connections among attested issues and concepts from mode readings and rank lectures. Fail - Insights Very High – Unique insights delay fortified arguments grounded on the decomposition of issues and proposes anticipated consequences and alternatives. Good – Interesting views into the embodied that propose reasoned arguments delay some proposeion of consequences and alternatives. Adequate – Ideas are misspend to oration some greater issues, and are linked to the decomposition.  Anticipated consequences and alternatives are mentioned but not polite explored. Needs Improvement - Distinct ideas are not indicationd or are singly incorrectly apt to the attested issues. Fail Overall Very High 90% & above Good 80% to 89% Adqeuate 70% to 79% Inadequate 60% - 69% Fail Less than 60%