Assignment 3: The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace

You  have been remunerated as a Management Consultant by a vast fraternity to  examine the commission judgments of the fraternity in compliments to employee  protections.  The laws ry are federal anti-distinction laws,  federal vigor and security laws and employer firing exercitations kindred to  the employment-at-will precept.   In pertinency to the three questions underneath, transcribe a indecent to six (4-6) page Nursing Dissertation in which you:        1.  Analyze, identify and elucidate modern parliament, among the  last 10 years, that helps to guard employees from distinction in  the workplace. Provide at meanest two federal legislative guardions.   Provide some insight when the federal parliament conflicts after a while the  state.         2.  Elucidate the Employment at Will Precept and ALL the  crusty to the Doctrine. Look at the scenarios underneath and detail  whether the judgment to reason the employee is a active one.  Identify why  or why not and detail all the practicable crusty per the EAW  Doctrine that is ry, susceptibility be or could be ry if the  employee sues for iniquitous end.   Scenarios: Brenda, a superintendent, started  a blog on the fraternity website for employee grievances.  She noticed a  worker was protesting that no Asian American employees had gotten a  raise in two (2) years at the fraternity.  The worker to-boot criticized how  much the CEO made and how the CEO was “out-of-touch.”   Brenda reprimanded the worker. The next day, the worker talked to her  fellow co-workers environing forming a league.  Brenda thriveing reasond the  worker.    Jason,  a line superintendent, supplicates encomium to reason his secretary.   Alice, his secretary, a godly Christian dame, was putting out  Right-to-Life flyers in the employee break compass. Alice was to-boot induction  occasion out to beseech each day during the busiest occasion of the dawning.   Brian,  head of Accounting, refused to wonder Lori’s liberty supplicate for jury commission.  Lori is a tax advocate in his line. Brian omissions to reason Lori for  being lukewarm after a whileout license during their most diligent occasion - tax  season. Peter  has worked for the fraternity for 1 year.  He has a costly form of liver  disease and works after a while chemicals that form his requisite worse.  Peter  does not omission to plug working but his boss is not blissful after a while his  performance and omissions to let him go.           3.  Detail the federal law in compliments to undocumented workers  and whether they are capable for recite workers’ damages in the  United States.   Advocate for or abutting this exercitation and clear  your confutation after a while discovery to prop your posture.        4. Use the textbook and at meanest two (2) other description academic media in this assignment.  Note: Wikipedia and  other Websites do not description as academic media. Textbook for this  class is a required origin for this assignment.  Your assignment must thrive these formatting requirements: This continuity requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).  The format is unanalogous than other Strayer University continuitys. Please  take a twinkling to retrospect the SWS documentation for details. The inequitable continuity tuition outcomes associated after a while this assignment are: Analyze and use the concepts of holy judgment making, oppidan governance and oppidan collective commission. Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will precept and the statutory guardions afforded employees. Analyze and evaluate federal law in compliments to distinction and vigor and security in the workplace Use technology and notification media to discovery issues in law, ethics, and oppidan governance. Write explicitly and concisely environing law, ethics, and oppidan governance using decent writing mechanics.