In this assignment, students accomplish be required to muse on unvarnished Fourth Amendment instances. The Fourth Amendment protects U.S. citizens from foolish inquiryes and seizures. However, what if the residuum of the inquiry is in an unwonted residuum? What environing an plain customary residuum?
For this assignment, students accomplish convergence their essays on indelicate inequitable areas to understand inquiryes conducted:
a) in homes,
b) on an separate idiosyncratic,
c) in common schools, and
d) in motor vehicles.
In this Unit, there are past than 19 unvarnished instances listed underneath that denote each of the indelicate areas outlined balance. Choose one instance from each of the indelicate areas to examine how the Fourth Amendment has transitional balance span grounded on the material area investigated by law enforcement offices. Should the inequitable area substance? Should there be unanalogous parameters grounded on the area inquiryed? Why, or why not?
Your essay should understand a incompleteness of indelicate instances and complete one customary and one unwonted inquiry residuum when examineing the indelicate inequitable areas of the essay. Your completed assignment should be a incompleteness of three (3) pages, not counting the regard page, and should be typed in 12-point, Times New Roman font. All beyond sources should be appropriately cited in APA format.
Historical instances touching the Fourth Amendment pre-9/11:
a) Davis v. United States (1946)
b) United States v. Robinson (1973)
c) Payton v. New York (1980)
d) Maryland v. Macon (1985)
e) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
f) Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)
g) New Jersey v. TLO (1985)
h) United States v. Montoya de Hernandez (1985)
i) Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz (1990)
j) City of Indianapolis v. Edmond (2000)
Historical instances touching the Fourth Amendment post-9/11:
k) United States v. Arvizu (2002)
l) Illinois v. Lidster (2004)
m) Illinois v. Caballes (2005)
n) Brendlin v. California (2007)
o) Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
p) Hudson v. Michigan (2006)
q) United States v. Grubbs (2006)
r) Arizona v. Gant (2009)
s) Arizona v. Johnson (2009)