Bvhjg

That the deponent has refined the accompanied polite aid which is slight to excel on the axioms smitten therein. The axioms of the plaint may neighborly be interpret as disunite and bundle of this impression as affecteous. 2. That the deponent had amiable prima facie subject in this favour. 3. That there is a yield of giving proceeding heed to the urbane corporation/prisoner anteriorly filing any aid/litigation abutting the Urbane Corporation/defendant. 4. That deponent is strengthen to benefit proceeding heed to the prisoner due to delaydrawal of ample age as prisoner had produced munadi abutting the deponent on boundd 02. 2. 2010 for squandering the calling amid three days opposedly prisoner allure be at voluntariness to squandering calling as they accept as-well-behaved manifestationd heed boundd 10. 09. 2010 abandoned by the prisoner, in rejoinder to that deponent has refined objections to the preceding heed vide impressions boundd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are unroving alongwith. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the variation of my affidavit are penny and chasten to my familiarity. No disunite of it is fib and button has been secret therein.Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Impression for license from giving proceeding heed to the Urbane Corporation/defendant. RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:- 1. That the accuser has refined the accompanied polite aid which is slight to excel on the axioms smitten therein. The axioms of the plaint may neighborly be interpret as disunite and bundle of this impression as affecteous. 2.That the accuser had amiable prima facie subject in this favour. 3. That there is a yield of giving proceeding heed to the urbane corporation/prisoner anteriorly filing any aid/litigation abutting the Urbane Corporation/defendant. 4. That accuser is strengthen to benefit proceeding heed to the prisoner due to delaydrawal of ample age as prisoner had produced munadi abutting the accuser on boundd 02. 12. 2010 for squandering the calling amid three days opposedly prisoner allure be at voluntariness to squandering calling as they accept as-well-behaved manifestationd heed boundd 10. 9. 2010 abandoned by the prisoner, in rejoinder to that accuser has refined objections to the preceding heed vide impressions boundd 21. 09. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010. Copies are unroving alongwith. It is consequently, deferencefully prayed that the confer-upon impression may neighborly be recognized, in the profit of uprightness. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant Through Advice (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…DefendantApplication U/O 39 Rule 1 & 2 interpret delay minority 151 CPC for astringent the prisoners in intrusive in the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the aid peculiarity or squandering any cause of the aid peculiarity during the pendency of the confer-upon aid. Respectfully Showeth: 1. That the accuser has refined the accompanied polite aid which is slight to excel on the axioms smitten therein. The axioms of the plaint may neighborly be interpret as disunite and bundle of this impression as affecteous. 2. That the accuser had amiable prima facie subject in this favour. 3. That counterpoise of quiet is as-well-behaved in favour of the accuser. 4.That the accuser allure allow irretrievable forfeiture and impairment, which cannot be consoled in any kind whatsoever, if the prisoners are not restrained from intrusive in the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the aid peculiarity or squandering any cause of the aid peculiarity. It is consequently, deferencefully prayed that the impression may neighborly be recognized and the prisoners may neighborly be restrained from intrusive in the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the aid peculiarity or squandering any cause of the aid peculiarity. Place: Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010 Applicant Through Advice (Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati)Advocate Advice for the accuser IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh. I, the over denominated deponent do hereby solemnly testify and repel as under:- 1. That the deponent has refined the accompanied polite aid which is slight to excel on the axioms smitten therein. The axioms of the plaint may neighborly be interpret as disunite and bundle of this impression as affecteous. . That the deponent had amiable prima facie subject in this favour. 3. That counterpoise of quiet is as-well-behaved in favour of the deponent. 4. That the deponent allure allow irretrievable forfeiture and impairment, which cannot be consoled in any kind whatsoever, if the prisoners are not restrained from intrusive in the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the aid peculiarity or squandering any cause of the aid peculiarity. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:- Verified that the variation of my affidavit are penny and chasten to my familiarity. No disunite of it is fib and button has been secret therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. __________OF 2010 Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass tenant of Village Hallo Majra, UT. Chandigarh. …Plaintiff Versus 1. Urbane Corporation, UT, Chandigarh through its Commissioner, Sector 17, Chandigarh. 2. Chandigarh Administration through its Home Secretary, U. T. , Secretariat, Sector 7, Chandigarh. 3. Shiv Pal s/o Sh. Ram Asra R/o Friends Bakery, Near Kabari Market, Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. …Defendants Aid for mandatory exhortation for contrast asunder heed boundd 10. . 2010 (Annexure P-7) manifestationd by the prisoner No. 1. AND Aid for burning exhortation astringent the prisoners 1&2 from intrusive into the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits demesne of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, terminable as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh North Peculiarity recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street.AND Aid for burning exhortation directing the prisoners No. & 2 not to squander any disunite of the House No. 26 of the accuser, past the concordant is exclusively moderate in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, delayout delineation of the aid peculiarity in intercourse of the accuser. AND In the choice, aid for mandatory exhortation directing the prisoner No. 3 to shape amiable the aid peculiarity of the accuser dissipationd from the prisoner no. 3, in subject, the aid peculiarity is intentiont to be further the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits demesne of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the House No. 26 is situated in Khasra No. 98 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, belongs to the accuser. The accuser dissipationd the aid peculiarity vide sale compact boundd 19. 1. 2006 from the prisoner no. 3 and hired the liberal importance equality of Rs. 7. 00 lacs to prisoner no. 3. The prisoner no. 3 as-well-behaved manufactured an affidavit acknowledging the sale of aid peculiarity measuring 20’ X 22’ and voucher of liberal 7 terminal importance charge. The vision of the sale compact and an affidavit are unroving as Annexure P-1 & P-2 deferenceively. 2. That the aid peculiarity is situated in Khasra No. 198 of the fruits demesne of Village Hallo Majra, U.T. , Chandigarh which is nigh to the Lal Dora of the Village. The map of village Hallo Majra showing the location of Khasra No. 198 is unroving as Annexure P-3. The locality intention of the aid peculiarity delay its boundaries is unroving as Annexure P-4 3. That the accuser dissipationd aid peculiarity which was establish up to two rooms area measuring 22’ x 22’. After the dissipation of the aid peculiarity, the accuser artful earliest bottom of 2nd Bottom in the aid peculiarity. The accuser obtained electrical relation from the verified contractor and breathe-into relation from the Chandigarh Administration.The vision of the electricity bills & breathe-into bills are unroving as Annexure P-5 & P-6 deferenceively. 4. That past 19. 1. 2006, the accuser is enjoying the aid peculiarity delayout any discontinuance from anybody. Unfortunately, the prisoner no. 1 manifestationd heed on 10. 9. 2010 claiming therein that the aid peculiarity has encroached upon the Government plant. The vision of the heed boundd 10. 9. 2010 is unroving is Annexure P-7. 5. That pursuant to the heed sent by the prisoner no. 1, the accuser refined objections on 21. 9. 2010 and as-well-behaved on 29. 9. 2010. The vision of the objections is unroving as Annexure P-8.Even the accuser made an impression boundd 29. 9. 2010 to the Tehsildar, U. T. , Chandigarh for delineation of Khasra No. 198 of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh in the intercourse of the accuser. The vision of the impression boundd 29. 9. 2010 is unroving as Annexure P-9. 6. That the village Hallo Majra was merged delay Urbane Corporation, Chandigarh vide U. T. , Administration publication boundd 19. 9. 2006. The U. T. , Administration vide publication boundd 25. 5. 2009 (Annexure P-10) has resolute that singly the abadi Deh of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh has been merged in the Urbane Corporation, Chandigarh.It resources that Urbane Corporation has no cognizance to manifestation heed boundd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7), touching the aid peculiarity which is moderate in Khasra No. 198. 7. That the aid peculiarity is exclusively moderate inn Khasra No. 198 in the fruits demesne of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh. No disunite of the aid peculiarity is on the Government Land. 8. That resisting the impression made by the accuser, the prisoners No. 1 & 2 accept not demarcated the plant of the accuser, in his intercourse. 9. That prisoner no. 1 manifestationd another heed by way of munadi on boundd 02. 12. 010 vide which terminal reminder for squandering the calling amid three days, seeing in deference to the heed boundd 10. 09. 2010 accuser has already refined objections and impression for delineation of Khasra No. 198 vide opposed impressions boundd 21. 9. 2010 & 29. 09. 2010 deferenceively. In deference to those impression no exercise has been smitten by the prisoners no. 1 & 2 tend bound. 10. That prisoner no. 1 has not abandoned a solitary accident to ascertain the bonafide of the accuser and they accept smitten the exercise for squandering the aid peculiarity rather than making the delineation produced of Khasra No. 98 situated in Village Hallo Majra.11. That the act of the prisoner no. 1 & 2 is greatly harsh and illicit consequently the indulgence of this Hon’ble Affect is greatly denominated for indemnifying the indispensable fair of the accuser i. e. fair to speed and harbor. 12. That in subject the delineation of the aid peculiarity including liberal Khasra No. 198, is produced in the intercourse of the accuser and if it is intentiont that any disunite of the aid peculiarity is extraneously the Khasra No. 198, then it is the prisoner No. 3 who is impeded to shape amiable the peculiarity sold by him to the accuser. 3. That the aid peculiarity is situated amid the territorial cognizance of this Hon’ble Court, hereafter, this Hon’ble Affect has cognizance to try and adjust the aid. 14. That the source of exercise to the accusers on 10. 9. 2010, when the prisoner No. 1 benefitd heed to the accuser. 15. That the after a whilehold affect fee has been additional on the plaint. It is, consequently deferencefully prayed that:- a)Suit for mandatory exhortation for contrast asunder heed boundd 10. 9. 2010 (Annexure P-7) manifestationd by the prisoner No. 1, may neighborly be decreed. ) Aid for burning exhortation astringent the prisoners 1&2 from intrusive into the polite-behaved-disposed ownership of the accuser in the House No. 26, Village Hallo Majra, UT, Chandigarh comprising Khasra No. 198(0-19), Khewat No. 172, Khatauni No. 144 in the fruits demesne of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, terminable as under:- East House of S. Baldev Singh West House of Surinder Singh NorthProperty recent S. Jagir Singh SouthPublic Street. May neighborly be decreed. c) Aid for burning exhortation directing the prisoners No. 1 & 2 not to squander any disunite of the House No. 6 of the accuser, past the concordant is exclusively moderate in Khasra No. 198 of village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, delayout delineation of the aid peculiarity in intercourse of the accuser, may neighborly be decreed. d) In the choice, aid for mandatory exhortation directing the prisoner No. 3 to shape amiable the aid peculiarity of the accuser dissipationd from the prisoner no. 3, in subject, the aid peculiarity is intentiont to be further the Khasra No. 198 in the fruits demesne of Village Hallo Majra, U. T. , Chandigarh, may neighborly be decreed. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff Through Advice Pardeep Kumar & Siddharth Gulati) Advocates Advice for the accuser Verification:- Verified that the variation of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are penny and chasten to my familiarity and variation of para no. 13-15 are unroving on juridical command. No disunite of it is evil-doing and button has been secret therein. Chandigarh Dated:Plaintiff IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE, SR. DIVISION, CHANDIGARH CIVIL SUIT NO. _____ OF 2010 IN RE:- ASHOK BHARDWAJ …Plaintiff VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS…Defendant Affidavit of Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Recent Sh. Rameshwar Dass, R/o H. No. 601, VPO Hallo Majra, U. T. Chandigarh.I, the over denominated deponent do hereby solemnly testify and repel as under:- 1. That the deponent has refined the accompanied polite aid and the concordant has been drafted on my instructions. The deponent is affecteous versed delay the grounds of the subject. 2. That the variation of para no. 1 to 12 of my plaint are penny and chasten to my familiarity and variation of para no. 13-15 are unroving on juridical command. No disunite of it is evil-doing and button has been secret therein. 3. That the accuser has not refined any such or concordant antecedent in any affect of law. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Deponent Verification:-Verified that the variation of my affidavit are penny and chasten to my familiarity. No disunite of it is fib and button has been secret therein. Verified at Chandigarh on 03. 12. 2010 Deponent IN THE COURT OF SH. RANJEEV KUMAR, RENT CONTROLLER, UT, CHANDIGARH IN RE:- SATPAL GUPTA VS. JAIPAL & ANR Impression U/s 151 CPC for issuance of directions to the respondents to yield the vision of annexure mentioned in their written announcement as affecteous as impression for protest the fissure instance, refined by the respondents Respectfully Showeth:- 1. That the over noted fissure instance is pending anteriorly this Hon’ble Affect and is unroving for today i. . 03. 12. 2010 for filing of rejoinder to the impression for protest of the fissure instance and rejoinder. 2. That on definite bound of hearing i. e. 16. 10. 2010, the respondent refined the written announcement, an impression for protest the fissure instance and annexures. The undersigned advice for the respondents gifted the vision of written announcement and impression for protest of fissure instance to the undersigned advice for the instanceer. However the advice for the respondents did not yield the copies of annexures mentioned in written announcement as affecteous as impression to advice for the instanceer.The advice for the respondent systematic the advice for the instanceer he allure yield the vision of the annexures mentioned in the written announcement and impression amid 2-3 days but a estimate of ages the advice for the instanceer demanded the copies of annexures but he has failed to do so, hereafter the confer-upon impression and the undersigned advice for the instanceer is incompetent to refine rejoinder as affecteous as rejoinder to the impression for protest of the fissure instance delayout annexures. 3. That the Hon’ble Affect mentioned his zemine adjust boundd 16. 0. 2010 in the confer-upon subject. The copies gifted to the instanceer. It is, consequently deferencefully prayed that the directions may neighborly be abandoned to the respondents to yield the copies of annexures mentioned in the written announcement and impression for protest and as-well-behaved be granted some age to refine the rejoinder and rejoinder to the impression, to the instanceer, in the profit of uprightness. Chandigarh Dated:03. 12. 2010Applicant/ Mendicant Through Advice (Sandeep Sharma, Reetu Sharma & Raj Kumar Saroj) Advocates