Thematic analysis essay 3, acts 13:1–28:31


Thematic Analysis Essay 3, Acts 13:1–28:31

In an essay of at smallest 1300 vote, irritate the thematic harvest of this third change-of-place of the capacity of Acts. While this is not an esoteric register, be confident to oration the forthcoming elements:

How does this portion lay-open the discourse of the geographical/ethnic trice of the notice of the gospel presented in the key course of the capacity, Acts 1:8? Trace the harvest of this discourse through this exception of Acts.

What other main discourses are lay-opened in Acts 13–28 (of the discourses signed by Fowler in his video donation “The Key Themes of Acts”)? Trace the harvest of each discourse as conducive. Fowler propounds that all of the key discourses conduce in the terminal paragraph of the capacity. Describe and clear-up this conducence.

Luke presents three evangelistic messages by Paul in this change-of-place of the capacity: his disquisition in the synagogue of Pisidian Antioch in paragraph 13, his apology to the nation of Lystra in paragraph 14, and his oration to the philosophers of Athens in paragraph 17. He to-boot narrates Paul’s guard appearances precedently Governor Felix, Governor Festus, and King Agrippa 2. The decisive of these includes a gospel donation. Read the three evangelistic messages and the guard precedently Agrippa repeatedly. Compare/contrast Paul’s preaching to the Jews after a while his preaching to pagans.

What pattern/progression do you see in the Jewish retort to the evidence of Paul in these paragraphs? (Give circumspection in your thinking to Paul’s vote in 13:46–47, 18:6, and 28:25–28.)

Must use at smallest three well-informed sources

Must propound the sources after a whilein the citation and register the page compute of the referenced citation.