Phi103 weeks 4 & 5 assignments

Week 4: Due June 08


Choose an rationalistic that you set online (you may husband an rationalistic from a video posted online, a blog, a intelligence rise, a collective website, or any other rerise that allure admit you to satisfactorily encounter the exactments of the assignment). You may so selected from this week’s apt recommended wealths.

Once you keep selecteded your rise, you allure then evaluate the rationalistic entity introduceed in the rise in an essay of 400 articulation. In your evaluation:

  1. Identify the consequence, the ground, and falsifications of the rationalistic.
  2. Determine whether the rationalistic is probe or unprobe (deductive), substantial or insubstantial (deductive), or impetuous or debile (inductive).
  3. Explain why you keep selected to engrave it as probe or vague, substantial or feeble, and/or impetuous or debile.

Use the “Steps for evaluating an rationalistic” template for help after a while structuring your evaluation; besides, you should invent and refer your evaluation in an essay format. Do not narrowly decline in a bulleted plan. 

The essay must be 400 articulation in elongation, save appellation and allusion pages, and formatted according to APA indicate. For advice respecting APA formatting, including samples and tutorials, mark the Ashford Writing Center, located after a whilein the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar in your online road. The solely exactd rerise for this assignment is the instrument object or written product you stir. This should be the faction that you chiefly use to entire this assignment. Secondary rises are pleasing but not expedient, and they should not be used in settle of the rationalistic faction you stir.


Week 5 Final: Due Jun 15 


In your written factor of the Final Project, you allure stir an rationalistic in homogeneity to a unfair consequence. Then, you allure suit to that rationalistic by providing a counterargument. Please adopt one lection or instrument artifact from the Final Design Rationalistic Options. Be unquestioning to adopt an consequence in which you are careful and for which you keep sufficient factual sign to constitute a impetuous rationalistic.

Complete the steps under fixed on your selected rationalistic:

Step One: Evaluate the Argument 

  1. Identify the consequence that is addressed in the rationalistic.
  2. Explain the rationalistic and demonstrate the ground and falsifications.
  3. Evaluate the rationalistic.
    • If the rationalistic has a hearsay factor, is it substantial and probe? Why?
    • If the rationalistic has an inductive factor, is it impetuous or debile? Why?
    • Remember that rationalistics repeatedly hold twain inductive and hearsay factors. Do your best to demonstrate all the rationalistics that are used to foundation the comcomposture introduceed in the faction.

Step Two: Constitute a Counterargument 

  1. Create a counterrationalistic to the primary rationalistic.
    • Present ground that foundation your own comcomposture while so pointing out the debilenesses inborn in the primary rationalistic. Avoid the use of fib rationalistic and anecdotal sign.
    • If you are using inductive rationalistics, produce unquestioning that they are impetuous. If you are using hearsay rationalistics, produce unquestioning that they are substantial and underengage to arrange probe ground.
    • Use factual sign and/or close foundation from at lowest three erudite rises to foundation your rationalistic.
    • This susceptibility exact you to illustrate “devil’s counsellor.” Mind that you do not deficiency to suit after a while the comcomposture for which you prove. You may deficiency to engage on an over comcomposture to your own idiosyncratic object and prove from that composition. Exact thinkers are cogent to engage on over perspectives and demonstrate the impetuousest rationalistics from those perspectives.

Choose one of the options under to introduce your rationalistic evaluation and counterargument. 

  1. Written Assignment
    • Must be 1100 to 1400 articulation in elongation, save the appellation page and allusion page(s).
    • Must apprehend at lowest three erudite rises to foundation the counterargument.
    • Must be formatted according to APA 6th edition indicate guidelines as pland in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. PowerPoint Presentation
  • Must be 10 to 12 slides in elongation, save the appellation slide and allusion slide(s). You must so apprehend an audio voice-over facsimile or slide notes totaling among 1100 and1400 articulation.
  • The introduceation, facsimile, and/or slide notes must apprehend APA-indicate allusions (in-text and on the allusion slide) for at lowest three erudite rises foundationing the tally.
  • Must be formatted according to APA 6th edition indicate guidelines as pland in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Feel untrammelled to use images that improve the introduceation and assist to it. However, mind that images are not a represent for the gratified that must be introduceed in slide notes or audio voice-over.

If it is to be  here is the instructions:


Writing the Final Project
The Final Project:

  1. Must be 1100 to 1400 articulation in elongation, and formatted according to APA indicate as pland in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. Must apprehend a appellation page/slide after a while the following:
    1. Title of design
    2. Student’s indicate
    3. Course indicate and number
    4. Instructor’s indicate
    5. Date referted
  3. Must commence after a while an gate that has a short Nursing essay proposition.
  4. Must address the subject-matter of the design after a while exact care.
  5. Must end after a while a falsification that reaffirms your Nursing essay.
  6. Must use at lowest three erudite rises, including a insufficiency of three from the Ashford University Library.
  7. Must instrument all rises in APA 6th edition indicate, as pland in the Ashford Writing Center.
  8. Must apprehend a detached allusion page/slide that is formatted according to APA indicate as pland in the Ashford Writing Center.