Part 2 | English homework help


Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II

 

 

When looking for advice encircling a subject-matter progeny, how frequently do you try to combat biases inside your own subject-matter of representation? This assignment asks you to gain in this deportment of precarious thinking.

The assignment is separated into two (2) faculty.

For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you interpret a book educe encircling precarious thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in prescribe to append advice, and gaind in prematch to study your thoughts.

* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you studyd the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you earn transcribe a pamphlet to synthedimension your ideas.

Part II – Writing

Write at three to disgusting (3-4) page pamphlet in which you:

1. State your situation on the theme you clarified for Assignment 1.1.

2. Identify (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation    and interpret why you clarified these inequitable reasons.

3. Interpret your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

4. Study at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.   

5. Discuss the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

6. Discuss whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny has stayed the similar.

The pamphlet should flourish guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match:

·         Include an precursory passage and ultimate passage.

·         Address ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and fooding decrees.

·         Adhere to criterion rules of English phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must flourish these formatting requirements:

·         Be typed, envelop spaced, using Times New Roman font (dimension 12), delay one-inch margins on all sides; passages and intimations must flourish APA Style format. Check delay your adherent for any added instructions.

·         Include a secure page containing the denomination of the assignment, the student’s designate, the adherent’s designate, the route denomination, and the bound. The secure page and the intimation page are not comprised in the required assignment page prolixity.

You must flourish these resignation guidelines:

·         Submit the essay to Turnitin.com and then refer the originality ment and ultimate essay delay any needed revisions to Blackboard.

The inequitable route attainments outcomes associated delay this assignment are:

·         Identify the loose fallacies, assumptions, and biases implicated in manipulative appeals and abuses of speech.

·         Create written composture utilizing the concepts of precarious thinking.

·         Use technology and advice instrument to elaboration progenys in precarious thinking skills and loose logic.

 

 

 

Grading for this assignment earn be domiciled on temper, logic / form, and speech and match skills, using the flourishing rubric.


Points: 100

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II

Criteria

 

Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

 

Fair
70-79% C

 

Proficient
80-89% B

 

Exemplary
90-100% A

1.State your situation on the theme.
Weight: 10%

Did not refer or inaccurately recognized your situation on the theme.

Insufficiently recognized your situation on the theme.

Partially recognized your situation on the theme.

Satisfactorily recognized your situation on the theme.

Thoroughly recognized your situation on the theme.

2. Identify (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpret why you clarified these inequitable reasons.
Weight: 10%

Did not refer or inaccurately signed (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpreted why you clarified these inequitable reasons.

Insufficiently signed (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpreted why you clarified these inequitable reasons. .

Partially signed (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpreted why you clarified these inequitable reasons.

Satisfactorily signed (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpreted why you clarified these inequitable reasons.

Thoroughly signed (3) three antecedent (reasons) from the Procon.org website that food your situation and interpreted why you clarified these inequitable reasons.

3. Interpret your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.
Weight: 10%

Did not refer or inaccurately interpreted your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

Insufficiently interpreted your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

Partially interpreted your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

Satisfactorily interpreted your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

Thoroughly interpreted your answers to the “believing” questions encircling the three (3) antecedent opposite your situation from the Procon.org website.

4. Study at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.
Weight: 15%

Did not refer or inaccurately studyd at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.

Insufficiently studyd at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.

Partially studyd at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.

Satisfactorily studyd at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.

Thoroughly studyd at last two (2) types of biases that you slight practiced as you evaluated the antecedent for and athwart your situation.

5. Discuss the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.
Weight: 10%

Did not refer or inaccurately discussed the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

Insufficiently discussed the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

Partially discussed the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

Satisfactorily discussed the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

Thoroughly discussed the property of your own enculturation or assemblage identification that may own influenced your biases.

6. Discuss whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny has stayed the similar.
Weight: 15%

Did not refer or inaccurately discussed whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny stayed the similar.

Insufficiently discussed whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny stayed the similar.

Partially discussed whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny stayed the similar.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny stayed the similar.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not your thinking encircling the theme has newfangled behind unconditional the “Believing Game,” uniform if your situation on the progeny stayed the similar.

7. Flourish APA Style requirements for format, in-text passage of quotes and paraphrases, and intimations page.
Weight: 10%

Did not entire the assignment or had further than 9 errors in flourishing APA Style requirements.

Had 8-9 errors in flourishing APA Style requirements.

Had 6-7 divergent errors in flourishing APA Style requirements.

Had 4-5 divergent errors in flourishing APA Style requirements.

Had 0-3 divergent errors in flourishing APA Style requirements.

8. Flourish guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match: apprehend an precursory and ultimate passage; address ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and fooding decrees.
Weight: 10%

Did not refer or inaccurately flourished guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match.

Insufficiently flourished guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match: did not apprehend an precursory and / or ultimate passage; did not address ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and fooding decrees.

Partially flourished guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match: comprised a insufficiently open precursory and / or ultimate passage; insufficiently addressed ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and fooding decrees.

Sufficiently flourished guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match: comprised an precursory and ultimate passage; sufficiently addressed ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and fooding decrees.

Thoroughly   followed guidelines for apparent and unembarrassed match: comprised an interesting precursory and anxious ultimate passage; wholly addressed ocean ideas in matter passages delay a theme decree and minute fooding decrees.

9. Adhere to criterion rules of English phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Weight: 10%

Did not entire the assignment or had further than 9 errors in phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 8-9 errors in phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 6-7 divergent errors in phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 4-5 divergent errors in phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 0-3 divergent errors in phraseology, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.