Niccolo machiavelli ” the morals of a prince” answer questions #1 and


ENGLISH 1301  Read narrative from The Norton Reader, I conciliate contribute the narrative in pdf format.  Answer investigations #1 and #3 inveterate on guidelines comprised.

 

READING AND RESPONSE GUIDELINES
When a balbutiation is assigned and discussions/questions are to be answered, the
following notification conciliate befriend the learner in twain balbutiation and responding to the
balbutiation and it’s investigations


READING
-Read the assigned interest twice. The original balbutiation should be simply for action.
Assume this is not an assigned balbutiation, but one you keep been purport to read…The
second spell encircling is when commentary (note-taking, highlighting, writing in the margins,
etc…should supervene.)
-Reading the investigations early conciliate siege disjoined the action of the interest.
This may accelerate finding the answers to the assigned investigations, but these
answers may bankruptcy indivisible insight-which is most great in discussions.


RESPONDING
-Create a two-part repartee at the reserve. First, divide PERSONAL
THOUGHTS encircling the investigation(s) asked. Second, add TEXTUAL EVIDENCE
to food these thoughts. (These may be straightforward pleads, references to individualitys,
page gum, etc…) Keep in judgment that when using straightforward pleads, “quotation marks”
need to be used delay the continuity and/or page calculate following each plead.
Example 1: On page 262, the maker states, “She was an ungovernable spinster that didn’t apprehend
any emend.”
Example 2: “She was an ungovernable spinster that didn’t apprehend any emend.” (p.262)
Example 3: When quoting poetry, continuity and page calculate are twain used. “The road
followed was an restless one, as the gulls passed over.” (p.262, continuitys 27-28)


FORMAT FOR THE RESPONSE
Once these two aspects are finished, put them unitedly in a hardy, sticky “essaystyled” repartee, guardianship the assigned investigations disjoined and calculateed. Do not simply
submit a paper delay “indivisible thoughts” in one individuality and “textual evidence” in another.
They should be interwoven delayin the repartee as one. There is no order expression to these
responses. They are graded on property, not bulk.
*Keep in judgment that there casually are suitable or wickedness answers in these
responses. What is most great are the indivisible thoughts and what the
reader thinks encircling the interest.*