Case study 16,18,and 22 | English homework help


How would you direct these manifestations. All you deficiency to do is prepare how you would direct each subject.

 

CASE STUDY Number:  16

 

Ethical Guidelines addressed in this subject:

2.13 Fees, Financial Arrangements, and Provisions of Consultation

a) As present as practicpowerful in a functional or philosophical conformity, the conduct analyst and the client or other delayhold magazine of conduct analytic uses arrive-at an conformity specifying wages and billing analystents.

c) Prior to the utensilation of uses the conduct analyst allure prepare in fitness the provisions of tpowerful delay notice to inequitpowerful requirements for providing uses and the province of all parties (a narrow or Declaration of Functional Services) (pg 303).

 

2.16 Interrupting or Terminating Services

b) When entering into pursuit or narrowual relatiagreementehavior analysts prepare for equpowerful and delayhold conversion of province for client trouble in the fact that the pursuit or narrowual conformity ends, delay chief suspect dedicated to the well-entity of the client.

c) Conduct analysts do not surrender clients. Conduct analysts end a functional conformity when it becomes reasonably disentangled that the client no craveer deficiencys the use, is not benefitting, or is entity harmed by continued use.

 

6.06 Conflicts delay Organizations

If the demands of an structure delay which conduct analysts are affiliated fight delay these Guidelines, conduct analysts exculpate the affection of the fight, shape notorious their commitment to these Guidelines, and to the space practicable, endeavor to direct the fight in a way that permits the fullest superabundance to these Guidelines.

 

Resolve the manifestation: 

            According to Guideline 2.16, a conduct analyst should not surrender clients; uses should barely be endd if the client no craveer deficiencys the use, the client is not benefitting, or the client is entity harmed. In this inequitpowerful subject, it would be undivine for the conduct analyst to surrender clients on the premise of pay. Precedently discontinuing uses, the preparer should set up a examineion to transact wages and billing sortments, as notpowerful in Guideline 2.13 noticeing Fees, Financial Arrangements and Provisions of Tpowerful (Bailey & Burch 2011).The nurture limit and the use preparer should allay a written narrow noticeing cancelment. In this subject the use preparer is faced delay fight delay her mistress, the nurture limit. As notpowerful in guideline 6.06, the conduct analyst is divinely obligated to underassume to direct the fight adhering to the guidelines (Bailey & Burch, 2011). To direct this manifestation, the use preparer should resist the nurture limit noticeing her pay, sort a examineion, and allay a written narrow noticeing paymen

Case Study #18:

 

Primary Divine Issue: A conduct analyst is asked to supervene a intentional agency of a top-fencing by a clinical psychologist for a 10 year old noticeing her noncompliance at nurture (said psychologist has not observed the child at nurture). The conduct analyst noticed the top-fencing agency is not normal and wonders if she should bear this to the parent’s regard. The parents are adamant environing the conduct analyst superveneing the top-fencing since they accept been delay the clinical psychologist for a crave duration. The conduct analyst is a fairly new BCBA and doesn't lack to shape the evil-doing collision on the race.

 

 

Ethical Guideline(s) Addressed in this Case:

 

1.04: Integrity

(a) “Behavior analysts are sincere and honorable. The conduct analyst supervenes through on contracts and functional commitments delay tall kind fruit and refrains from making functional commitments that he/she cannot keep” (p. 60).

 

2.10: Texture Efficacy

(a) “The conduct analyst frequently had the province to commend philosophicalally cheered most efficacious texture processs. Efficacious texture processs accept been validated as having twain crave-term and short-term benefits to clients and community” (p. 87).

(b) “Clients accept a fit to efficacious texture (i.e., naturalized on the lore lore and helpful to the single client)” (p. 87).

(c) “Behavior analyst are binding for re-examination and appraisal of mitigated possessions of all resource textures, including those prepared by other disciplines and no agency” (p. 87).

(d) “In those instances where further than one philosophicalally cheered texture has been normal, appended factors may be considered in selecting agencys, including, but not poor to, aptitude and cost-effectiveness, risks and side-possessions of the agencys, client favor, and practitioner habit and training” (p. 88).

3.05: Describing Program Objectives

“The conduct analyst describes, in fitness, the objectives of the conduct alter program to the client or client-surrogate precedently undertakeing to utensil the program. And to the

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    2

 

 

space mitigated, a risk-benefit segregation should be conducted on the process to be utensiled to arrive-at the objective” (p. 114-115).

 

4.0: The Conduct Analyst and the Single Conduct Alter Program

“The conduct analyst (a) designs programs that are naturalized on conduct analytic principles, including assessments of goods of other agency methods, (b) involves the client or the client-surrogate in the cunningning of such programs, (c) allures the acquiesce of the client, and (d) commendations the fit of the client to end uses at any duration” (p. 120).

 

4.04: ApprovingInterventions

“The conduct analyst must allure the client's or client-surrogate's plaudit in fitness of the conduct agency processs precedently utensiling them” (p. 122-123).

 

4.08: Program Modifications

“The conduct analyst modifies the program on the premise of axioms” (p. 126).

 

4.09: Program Variation Consent

“The conduct analyst expounds program variation and the reasons for the variations to the client or client-surrogate and allures acquiesce to utensil the variations” (p. 126).

 

7.0 The Conduct Analyst's Divine Province to the Scope of Conduct Analysis.

“The conduct analyst has a province to influence the values of the scope, to proclaim experience to the open, to be free delay these guidelines, and to intimidate disfigurement by non-certified singles” (p. 159).

 

9.01 Elevation in Society

“The conduct analyst should prefer the contact of conduct principles in community by presenting a conductal resource to other processs or methods” (p. 175).

 

 

Resolve the manifestation:

The conduct analyst should assume axioms on her notice in the classroom so he/she is powerful to influence her thoughts environing the top-fencing not normal. After she has gathered abundance axioms she should engage delay the parents and examine her findings. He/She could besides engage delay twain parents and clinical psychologist to examine her findings on the top-fencing not entity efficacious and the reasons she thinks it influence not be normal (perhaps its not reinforcing anymore). He/She can besides propose a new agency cunning, naturalized on deposition naturalized methods and  adapt the top fencing to it if the parents are adamant environing having an agency naturalized on it.

 

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    3

 

Case Study #22:

Primary Divine Issue: The conduct analysts are promoting and helping to utensil conduct agencys that are not deposition naturalized. Their reasoning is that "if it doesn't annoy anyone or my uses then I don't deficiency to plague environing it entity unethical".

 

 

Ethical Guideline(s) Addressed in this Case:

 

1.01: Reliance on Philosophical Knowledge

“The conduct analyst maintains the tall standards of functional conduct of the functional structure” (p. 58).

 

2.10: Texture Efficacy

(a) “The conduct analyst frequently had the province to commend philosophicalally cheered most efficacious texture processs. Efficacious texture processs accept been validated as having twain crave-term and short-term benefits to clients and community” (p. 87).

(b) “Clients accept a fit to efficacious texture (i.e., naturalized on the lore lore and helpful to the single client)” (p. 87).

(c) “Behavior analyst are binding for re-examination and appraisal of mitigated possessions of all resource textures, including those prepared by other disciplines and no agency” (p. 87).

 

8.0: The Conduct Analyst's Province to Colleagues

“Behavior analysts accept an contract to bear regard to and direct divine deflections by assessors” (p. 166).

 

8.01: Divine Violations by Behavioral and Non-behavioral Colleagues

“When conduct analysts value that there may accept been an divine deflection by another conduct analyst, or non-behavioral assessor, they underassume to direct the manifestation by bearing it to the regard of that single if an circumlocutory conversion appears delayhold and the agency does not transgress any confidentiality fits that may be confused. If conversion is not allureed, and the conduct analyst values a client's fits are entity transgressd, the conduct analyst may assume appended steps as certain for the shelter of the client” (p. 167-168).

 

 

 

Resolve the manifestation:

 

The conduct analyst should bear to the regard of the other conduct analysts how undivine it is to prefer textures that are not deposition naturalized and expound how that is a deflection of the divine guidelines for a conduct analyst (Guideline 2.10a). He/She should remind the other conduct analysts the fit of the client to accept an efficacious texture and their province to prefer these deposition naturalized textures barely. If averse to bung the elevation of non-deposition naturalized textures then the conduct analyst in topic should

Team Discussion: Lesson 3                                                                                                    4

 

 

assume appended steps to repute the locality and fix that the client is getting the best mitigated use they can.

 

 

 

 

References:

 

Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2011). Appendix A: Conduct Analyst Certification Board Guidelines for Binding Conduct for Conduct Analysts. Ethics for conduct analysts (2nded) (pp. 293-322). New York: Routledge

 

Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2011). Appendix C: Fifty Ethics Scenarios for Conduct Analysts. Ethics for conduct analysts (2nded) (pp. 331-352). New York: Routledge