20191104233002hiltonplatt_11e_sm_ch031 x
During week three you will be reading about applying overhead costs to a job or batch. Problem 3-54 on page 126 in your textbook has a great ethical issue around the under application of manufacturing overhead. Please read the scenario presented in that problem. Then in your post answer the two questions posed. Question #1 asks you for each of the tree alternative courses of action that Jackson is considering, explain whether or not the action is appropriate. For question #2 assume that Jackson again approaches Brown to make the necessary adjustments and is unsuccessful. Describe the steps that Jackson should take in proceeding to resolve this situation.
CHAPTER3
Product
Cost
ing and Cost Accumulation in a Batch Production Environment
Focus on ethics (Located before the Chapter Summary in the te
x
t.)
Did Boeing exploit accounting rules to conceal cost overruns and production snafus?
According to the circumstances alleged in the Business Week article cited in the text, Boeing did not handle its cost overruns, production problems, and the merger with McDonnell-Douglas in a transparent manner. Boeing allegedly acted to conceal its worsening operational problems through “earnings management” to ensure that the merger would be approved by the stockholders of both companies. While the method of “program accounting” is common in the aircraft industry, in this rather extreme case that accounting method did not result in a fair portrayal of the company’s financial and operational situation. As a result, the merger was approved on the basis of alleged misleading information, and it is the investors who will bear the brunt of this action.
The company’s top executives and their accountants must share the responsibility for these actions, the former for providing the data and the latter for approving it for public release. No accounting system should be used as a tool to cover up operational problems and mislead shareholders. One wonders also what the auditors were doing to assess the accuracy of the accounting information.
Answers to Review Questions
3-1
(a)
Use in financial accounting: In financial accounting, product costs are needed to determine the value of inventory on the balance sheet and to compute the cost-of-goods-sold expense on the income statement.
1.
Use in managerial accounting: In managerial accounting, product costs are needed for planning, for cost control, and for decision making.
1. Use in cost management: In order to manage, control, or reduce the costs of
manufacturing
products or providing services, management needs a clear idea of what those costs are.
(d)
Use in reporting to interested organizations: Product cost information is used in reporting on relationships between firms and various outside organizations. For example, public utilities such as electric and gas companies record product costs to justify rate increases that must be approved by state regulatory agencies.
3-2 In a job-order costing system, costs are assigned to batches or job orders of production. Job-order costing systems are used by firms that produce relatively small numbers of dissimilar products. In a process-costing system, production costs are averaged over a large number of product units. Process-costing systems are used by firms that produce large numbers of nearly identical products.
3-3 Concepts of product costing are
applied
in service industry firms to inform management of the costs of producing services. For example, banks record the costs of producing financial services for the purposes of planning, cost control, and decision making.
3-4 a. Material requisition form: A document upon which the production department supervisor requests the release of raw materials for production.
b. Labor time record: A document upon which employees record the time they spend working on each production job or batch.
c. Job-cost record: A document on which the costs of direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing
overhead
are recorded for a particular production job or batch. The job-cost sheet is a subsidiary ledger account for the
Work-in-Process Inventory
account in the general ledger.
3-5 Although manufacturing-overhead costs are not directly traceable to products, manufacturing operations cannot take place without incurring overhead costs. Consequently, overhead costs are applied to products for the purpose of making pricing decisions, in order to ensure that product prices cover all of the costs of production.
3-6 The primary benefit of using a predetermined overhead rate instead of an
actual
overhead rate is to provide timely information for decision making, planning, and control.
3-7 An advantage of prorating overapplied or underapplied overhead is that it results in the adjustment of all the accounts affected by misestimating the overhead rate. These accounts include the Work-in-Process Inventory account, the
Finished-Goods Inventory
account, and the
Cost of Goods
Sold
account. The resulting balances in these accounts are more accurate when proration is used than when overapplied or underapplied overhead is closed directly into
Cost of Goods Sold
. The primary disadvantage of prorating overapplied or underapplied overhead is that it is more complicated and time-consuming than the simpler alternative of closing overapplied or underapplied overhead directly into Cost of Goods Sold.
3-8 An important cost-benefit issue involving accuracy versus timeliness in accounting for overhead involves the use of a predetermined overhead rate or an actual overhead rate. Since an actual overhead rate is computed after costs have been incurred and activity has been recorded, it is more accurate than a predetermined rate. However, a predetermined overhead rate is more timely than an actual rate, since the predetermined rate is computed earlier and in time to be used for making decisions, planning, and controlling operations.
3-9 The difference between actual and normal costing systems involves the procedure for applying manufacturing overhead to Work-in-Process Inventory. Under actual costing, applied overhead is the product of the actual overhead rate (computed at the end of the period) and the actual amount of the cost driver used. Under normal costing, applied overhead is the product of the predetermined overhead rate (computed at the beginning of the period) and the actual amount of the cost driver used.
3-10 When a single volume-based cost driver is used to apply manufacturing overhead, the managerial accountant’s primary objective is to select a cost driver that varies in a pattern similar to the pattern in which manufacturing overhead varies. Moreover, if a single cost driver is used, it should be some productive input that is common to all of the firm’s products.
3-11 The benefit of using multiple overhead rates is that the resulting product-costing information is more accurate and more useful for decision making than is the information that results from using a single overhead rate. However, the use of multiple cost drivers and overhead rates is more complicated and more costly.
3-12 The development of departmental overhead rates involves a two-stage process. In stage one, overhead costs are assigned to the firm’s production departments. First, overhead costs are distributed to all departments, including both service and production departments. Second, costs are allocated from the service departments to the production departments. At the end of stage one, all overhead costs have been assigned to the production departments.
In stage two, the costs that have been accumulated in the production departments are applied to the production jobs that pass through the departments.
3-13 a.
Overhead
cost distribution: Assignment of all manufacturing-overhead costs to department overhead centers.
b. Service department cost allocation: Allocation of service department costs to production departments on the basis of the relative proportion of each service department’s output that is used by the various production departments.
c. Overhead application (or overhead absorption): The assignment of all manufacturing overhead costs accumulated in a production department to the jobs that the department has worked on.
These three processes are used in developing departmental overhead rates.
3-14 Job-order costing concepts are used in professional service firms. However, rather than referring to production “jobs,” such organizations use terminology that reflects their operations. For example, hospitals and law firms assign costs to “cases,” and governmental agencies often refer to “programs” or “missions.” It is important in such organizations to accumulate the costs of providing the services associated with a case, project, contract, or program. Such cost information is used for planning, cost control, and pricing, among other purposes.
3-15 A cost driver is a characteristic of an event or activity that results in the incurrence of costs by that event or activity. A volume-based cost driver is one that is closely associated with production activity, such as the number of units produced,
direct-labor
hour
s, or machine hours.
3-16 When direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing-overhead costs are incurred, they are applied to Work-in-Process Inventory by debiting the account. When goods are finished, the costs are removed from that account with a credit, and they are transferred to Finished-Goods Inventory by debiting that account. Subsequently, when the goods are sold, Finished-Goods Inventory is credited, and the costs are added to Cost of Goods Sold with a debit.
3-17 Hospitals use job-order costing concepts to accumulate the costs associated with each case treated in the hospital. For example, the costs of treating a heart patient would be assigned to that patient’s case. These costs would include the hospital room, food and beverages, medications, and specialized services such as diagnostic testing and X rays.
3-18 Some manufacturing firms are switching from direct-labor hours to machine hours or throughput time as the basis for overhead application as a result of increased automation in their factories. With increased automation comes a reduction in the amount of direct labor used in the production process. In such cases, direct labor may cease to be a cost driver that varies in a pattern similar to the way in which manufacturing-overhead costs are incurred.
3-19
Overapplied
or underapplied overhead is caused by errors in estimating the predetermined overhead rate. These errors can occur in the numerator (budgeted manufacturing overhead), or in the denominator (budgeted level of the cost driver).
3-20 Overapplied or underapplied overhead can be closed directly into Cost of Goods Sold, or it can be prorated among Work-in-Process Inventory, Finished-Goods Inventory, and Cost of Goods Sold.
3-21 A large retailer would assign overhead costs as part of the cost of goods sold. At a retailer, such costs tend to be the support costs associated with moving products to be sold, controlling those products (theft prevention), and management of the operation.
3-22 A non-profit organization would assign overhead costs as part of the cost of services delivered. At a non-profit organization, such costs would include the support costs required to be able to deliver the services that are included in their mission. These can include such items as supervision, transportation, security, and governmental reporting.
Solutions to Exercises
Exercise 3-23 (10 minutes)
1. Process
1. Job-order
1. Job-order (contracts or projects)
1. Process
1. Process
5.
Job-order
6.
Process
7.
Job-order (contracts or projects)
8.
Process
9.
Job-order
Exercise 3-24 (15 minutes)
1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) |
At 200 ,000 chicken volume: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(b) |
At 30 0 ,000 chicken volume: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) |
At 400 ,000 chicken volume: |
Exercise 3-24 (continued)
2.
The predetermined overhead rate does not change in proportion to the change in production volume. As production volume increases, the $
100
,000 of fixed overhead is allocated across a larger activity base. When volume rises by 50%, from
200,000
to
300,000
chickens, the decline in the overhead rate is 28.33% [(.60
–
.43)/.60]. When volume rises by 3
3.
33%, from 300,000 to 400,000 chickens, the decline in the overhead rate is 18.6% [(.43 – .35)/.43].
Exercise 3-25 (5 minutes)
Work-in-Process Inventory |
5,480 |
||||||||||
Raw-Material Inventory |
4,600 |
||||||||||
Wages Payable (40 x $17) |
680 |
||||||||||
Manufacturing Overhead (40 x ($5) |
200 | ||||||||||
Finished-Goods Inventory |
|||||||||||
Work-in-Process Inventory |
EXERCISE 3-26 (30 MINUTES)
Job-order costing is the appropriate product-costing system for feature film production, because a film is a unique production. The production process for each film would use labor, material and support activities (i.e., overhead) in different ways. This would be true of any type of film (e.g., filming on location, filming in the studio, or using animation).
Exercise 3-27 (20 minutes)
Raw-material inventory, January 1 |
$13 4,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Raw-material purchases |
19 1,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Raw material available for use |
$32 5,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Deduct: Raw-material inventory, January 31 |
124,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Raw material used in January |
$2 01,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Direct labor |
300 ,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total prime costs incurred in January |
$501,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
2. |
Total prime cost incurred in January |
||||||||||||||||||||
Applied manufacturing overhead (60% $300,000) |
180 ,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total manufacturing cost for January |
$6 81,000 |
Exercise 3-27 (continued)
3. | ||||||||||||
Add: Work-in-process inventory, January 1 |
2 35,000 |
|||||||||||
Subtotal |
$9 1 6,000 |
|||||||||||
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, January 31 |
251,000 |
|||||||||||
Cost of goods manufactured |
$665,000 |
4.
Finished-goods inventory, January 1
$12
5,000
Add: Cost of goods manufactured
665,000
Cost of goods available for sale
$7
90,000
Deduct: Finished-goods inventory, January 31
1
1
7,000
Cost of goods sold
$67
3,000
Since the company accumulates overapplied or underapplied overhead until the end of the year, no adjustment is made to cost of goods sold until December 31.
Applied manufacturing overhead for January
$
1
80,000
Actual
manufacturing overhead incurred in January
1
75,000
Overapplied overhead
as of January 31
$ 5,000
The balance in the Manufacturing Overhead account on January 31 is a $5,000 credit balance.
NOTE: Actual selling and administrative expense, although given in the exercise, is irrelevant to the solution.
Exercise 3-28 (15 minutes)
Applied manufacturing overhead |
= |
total manufacturing costs30% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
$2, 500 ,00030% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$750,000 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
direct-labor cost80% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct-labor cost |
applied manufacturing overhead80% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$750,000.8 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$937,500 |
2.
Direct-material cost
=
total manufacturing cost
– direct labor cost
– applied manufacturing overhead
=
$
2,500
,000 – $937,500 – $750,000
=
$812,500
3.
Let X denote work-in-process inventory on December 31.
work-in-process
work-in-process
cost of
+
inventory,
inventory,
=
goods
cost
Jan.1
Dec. 31
manufactured
$2,500,000
+
.75X
–
X
=
$2,425,000
.25X
=
$2,500,000 – $2,425,000
X
=
$300,000
Work-in-process inventory on December 31 amounted to $300,000.
Exercise 3-29 (25 minutes)
JOB-COST RECORD |
|||||||||||||||||||
Job Number |
TB78 |
Description |
teddy bears |
||||||||||||||||
Date Started |
4/1 |
Date Completed |
4/15 |
||||||||||||||||
Number of Units Completed |
1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Direct Material |
|||||||||||||||||||
Date |
Requisition Number |
Quantity |
Unit Price |
Cost | |||||||||||||||
101 |
400 |
$.80 |
$320 |
||||||||||||||||
4/5 |
108 |
500 |
.30 |
150 |
|||||||||||||||
Direct Labor |
|||||||||||||||||||
Time Card Number |
Hours |
Rate |
|||||||||||||||||
4/1 – 4/8 |
Various time cards |
$12 |
$6,000 |
||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing Overhead | |||||||||||||||||||
Activity Base |
Application Rate |
||||||||||||||||||
Direct-labor hours |
$2 |
$1,000 |
|||||||||||||||||
Cost Summary |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cost Item |
Amount |
||||||||||||||||||
Total Direct Material Total Direct Labor Total Manufacturing Overhead |
$ 470 6,000 1,000 |
||||||||||||||||||
Total Cost |
$7,470 |
||||||||||||||||||
Unit Cost |
$ 7.47 |
||||||||||||||||||
Shipping Summary |
|||||||||||||||||||
Date |
Units Shipped |
Units Remaining In Inventory |
Cost Bal ance |
||||||||||||||||
4/30 |
700 |
300 |
$2,241 * |
*300 units remaining in inventory$7.47 = $2,241
Exercise 3-30 (30 minutes)
Crunchem Cereal Company |
||||||
Direct material: |
||||||
Raw-material inventory, January 1 |
$ 30,000 |
|||||
Add: Purchases of raw material |
27 8,000 |
|||||
Raw material available for use |
$308,000 |
|||||
Deduct: Raw-material inventory, December 31 |
33,000 |
|||||
Raw material used |
$275,000 |
|||||
120,000
|
||||||
Manufacturing overhead |
25 2,000 |
* | ||||
Total manufacturing costs |
$647,000 |
|||||
39,000 |
||||||
$ 686,000
|
||||||
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, December 31 |
42,900 |
|||||
$64 3,100
|
*Applied manufacturing overhead is $252,000 ($120,000210%). Actual manufacturing overhead is also $252,000, so there is no overapplied or underapplied overhead.
$ 42,000 |
|
643,100 |
|
$685,100 |
|
Deduct: Finished-goods inventory, December 31 |
46,200 |
$6 38 ,900 |
3. In the electronic version of the solutions manual, press the CTRL key and click on the following link: Build a Spreadsheet 03-30.xls
Exercise 3-31 (20 minutes)
Raw-Material Inventory | Work-in-Process Inventory | ||||||
227,000 |
18,000 |
||||||
174,000 |
DM 174,000 |
||||||
53,000 |
DL 324,000 |
||||||
MOH 180,000 |
|||||||
Wages Payable |
120,000 |
||||||
324,000 |
5 76 ,000 |
||||||
Finished-Goods Inventory | |||||||
180,000 |
30,000 |
||||||
Sales Revenue |
132,000 |
||||||
195,000 |
|||||||
Account s Receivable |
Cost of Goods Sold | ||||||
Reimel Furniture Company, Inc. |
||||
Current assets |
||||
Cash |
XXX |
|||
Accounts receivable |
||||
Inventory |
||||
Raw material |
$ 53,000 |
|||
Work in process |
||||
Finished goods |
18,000 | |||
Reimel Furniture Company, Inc. |
||||
Sales revenue |
$195,000 |
|||
Less: Cost of goods sold |
132,000 |
|||
Gross margin |
$ 63,000 |
Exercise 3-32 (20 minutes)
Raw material: |
|||
Beginning inventory |
$ 71,000 |
||
Add: Purchases |
? |
||
Deduct: Raw material used |
326,000 |
||
Ending inventory |
$ 81,000 |
||
Therefore, purchases for the year were |
$3 36,000 |
||
Direct labor: |
|||
Total manufacturing cost | $686,000 | ||
Deduct: Direct material |
|||
Direct labor and manufacturing overhead |
3 60,000 |
||
Direct labor + manufacturing overhead |
$360,000 |
||
Direct labor + (60%) (direct labor) |
|||
(160%) (direct labor) |
|||
Direct labor | $360,000 | ||
1.6 |
|||
$225,000 |
|||
Cost of goods manufactured: |
|||
Work in process, beginning inventory |
$ 80,000 |
||
Add: Total manufacturing costs |
686,000 | ||
Deduct: Cost of goods manufactured |
? |
||
Work in process, ending inventory |
$ 30,000 |
||
Therefore, cost of goods manufactured was |
$736,000 |
Exercise 3-32 (Continued)
Cost of goods sold: |
|
Finished goods, beginning inventory |
$ 90,000 |
Add: Cost of goods manufactured |
736,000 |
Cost of goods available for sale |
$826,000 |
Deduct: Cost of goods sold |
|
Finished goods, ending inventory |
$1 10,000 |
Therefore, cost of goods sold was |
$716,000 |
Exercise 3-33 (20 minutes)
Calculation of
proration amounts:
Calculation of | |||||
Account |
Percent age |
||||
Work in Process |
$ 35, 250 |
25% |
35,250 $141,000 |
||
Finished Goods |
49,350 |
35% |
49,350 $141,000 |
||
5 6,400 |
40% |
56,400 $141,000 |
|||
$141,000 |
100% |
Underapplied |
Amount Added |
|||||
Overhead | x |
to Account |
||||
$16,000 * |
25% |
$4,000 |
||||
16,000 |
35% |
5,600 |
||||
40% |
6,400 |
*
Underapplied overhead
= actual overhead – applied overhead
$16,000 = $157,000 – $141,000
Journal entry: |
||||
4,000 | ||||
5,600 | ||||
6,400 | ||||
16,000 |
Exercise 3-34 (15 minutes)
NOTE: Actual selling and administrative expense, although given in the exercise, is irrelevant to the solution.
To compute actual manufacturing overhead: |
||||
Depreciation |
$ 231,000 |
|||
Property taxes |
21,000 |
|||
Indirect labor |
82,000 |
|||
Supervisory salaries |
200,000 | |||
Utilities |
59,000 |
|||
Insurance |
30,000 | |||
Rental of space |
300,000 | |||
Indirect material: |
||||
Beginning inventory, January 1 |
$ 48,000 |
|||
Add: Purchases |
94,000 |
|||
Indirect material available for use |
$142,000 |
|||
Deduct: Ending inventory, December 31 |
63,000 |
|||
Indirect material used |
79,000 |
|||
Actual manufacturing overhead |
$1,002,000 |
|||
actual | applied | |||
Overapplied | ||||
overhead | ||||
$1,002,000 – ($13.3080,000*) = $ 62,000 |
*Actual direct-labor hours.
Manufacturing Overhead |
62,000 | |||||||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold |
4. In the electronic version of the solutions manual, press the CTRL key and click on the following link: Build a Spreadsheet 03-34.xls
EXERCISE 3-35 (20 MINUTES)
NOTE: Budgeted sales revenue, although given in the exercise, is irrelevant to the solution.
Predetermined overhead rate |
$36.40 per machine hour |
$18.20 per direct-labor hour |
$1.30 per direct-labor dollar or 130% |
*Budgeted direct-labor cost = 20,000$14
Actual manufacturing overhead |
– |
applied overhead |
= |
overapplied or |
$ 3 40,000 – ( 11,000 )($36.40) |
$60,400 overapplied overhead |
|||
$340,000 – (18,000)($18.20) |
$1 2,400 underapplied overhead |
|||
$340,000 – ($2 70,000 † )(130%) |
$11,000 overapplied overhead |
†Actual direct-labor cost = 18,000$15
Exercise 3-36 (5 minutes)
340,000 | ||||
Manufacturing Overhead |
||||
400,400 |
||||
EXercise 3-37 (10 minutes)
Budgeted overhead
rate = budgeted overhead / budgeted direct professional labor
160% = 400,000 euros / 250,000 euros
Contract to redecorate mayor’s offices: |
||||
Direct material |
3,500 euros |
|||
Direct professional labor |
6,000 euros |
|||
Overhead (160% 6,000 euros) |
9,600 euros |
|||
Total contract cost |
19,100 euros |
exercise 3-38 (15 minutes)
Memorandum |
|||||
Date: |
Today |
||||
To: |
President |
||||
From: |
I.M. Student |
||||
Subject: |
Cost driver for overhead application |
||||
I recommend direct-labor hours as the best volume-based cost driver upon which to base the application of manufacturing overhead. Since our products are made by hand, direct labor is a very significant production input. Moreover, the incurrence of manufacturing overhead cost appears to be related to the use of direct labor. |
Exercise 3-38 (Continued)
I recommend either machine hours or units of production as the most appropriate cost driver for the application of manufacturing overhead. Since our production process is highly automated, machine hours are the most significant production input. Also, our chips are nearly identical, so the amount of overhead incurred in their production does not vary much across product lines. The incurrence of manufacturing overhead cost appears to be related closely both to machine time and units of production. |
Exercise 3-39 (15 minutes)
Work-in-Process Inventory: Tanning Department |
6,000a |
||||||
Manufacturing Overhead |
6,000 | ||||||
Work-in-Process Inventory: Assembly Department |
540 b |
||||||
540 | |||||||
Work-in-Process Inventory: Saddle Department |
3,200 c |
||||||
3,200 | |||||||
Exercise 3-40 (10 minutes)
Overhead distribution: Allocation of the hospital’s building maintenance and custodial costs to all of the hospital’s departments.
Service-department cost allocation: Allocation of the hospital’s Personnel Department costs to the direct-patient-care departments in the hospital.
Overhead application: Assignment of the overhead costs in the maternity ward to each patient-day of care provided to new mothers.
EXERCISE 3-41 (15 MINUTES)
Total staff compensation = $280,000 + $420,000 = $700,000 |
Overhead rate = total budgeted overhead/total budgeted staff compensation |
= $756,000/$700,000 |
= 108% |
Applied overhead = 108% × total direct professional labor |
= 108% × ($ 1,200 + $2,000) |
= $3,456 |
Applied overhead using single cost driver = $3,456 |
Applied overhead using two cost drivers = $3,480 ($1,080 + $2,400) See the illustration in the text. |
solutions to Problems
Problem 3-42 (45 minutes)
NOTE: The 12/31/x1 balances for cash and accounts receivable, although given in the problem, are irrelevant to the solution.
Twisto Pretzel Company |
||||||
Raw-material inventory, 12/31/x0 |
$10,100 |
|||||
39,000 |
||||||
$49,100 |
||||||
Deduct: Raw-material inventory, 12/31/x1 |
11,000 |
|||||
$38,100 |
||||||
79,000 | ||||||
Manufacturing overhead: |
||||||
Indirect material |
$ 4,900 |
|||||
Indirect labor |
29,000 |
|||||
Depreciation on factory building |
3, 800 |
|||||
Depreciation on factory equipment |
2,100 |
|||||
Utilities |
||||||
Property taxes |
2,400 | |||||
Insurance |
3,600 |
|||||
Rental of warehouse space |
3,100 |
|||||
Total actual manufacturing overhead |
$54,900 |
|||||
Add: Overapplied overhead* |
||||||
Overhead applied to work in process |
58,000 |
|||||
$175,100 |
||||||
Add: Work-in-process inventory, 12/31/x0 |
8,100 |
|||||
$183,200 |
||||||
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, 12/31/x1 |
8,300 |
|||||
$174,900 |
*The Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured lists the manufacturing costs applied to work in process. Therefore, the overapplied overhead, $3,100, must be added to total actual overhead to arrive at the amount of
overhead applied
to work in process. If there had been underapplied overhead, the balance would have been deducted from total actual manufacturing overhead. The amount of overapplied overhead is found by subtracting actual overhead, $54,900 (as computed above), from applied overhead, $58,000 (given).
Problem 3-42 (Continued)
Twisto Pretzel Company |
||
Finished-goods inventory, 12/31/x0 |
$ 14,000 |
|
Add: Cost of goods manufactured* |
174,900 |
|
$188,900 |
||
Deduct: Finished-goods inventory, 12/31/x1 |
15,400 |
|
$173,500 |
||
Deduct: Overapplied overhead† |
||
Cost of goods sold (adjusted for overapplied overhead) |
$170,400 |
*The cost of goods manufactured is obtained from the Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured.
†The company closes underapplied or overapplied overhead into cost of goods sold. Hence, the balance in overapplied overhead is deducted from cost of goods sold for the month.
Twisto Pretzel Company |
|||
$20 5,800 |
|||
170,400 |
|||
$ 35,400 |
|||
Selling and administrative expenses: |
|||
Salaries |
$13,800 |
||
2,500 | |||
Depreciation |
1,200 | ||
Rental of office space |
1,700 |
||
Other expenses |
4,000 |
||
Total |
23,200 |
||
Income before taxes |
$12,200 |
||
Income tax expense |
5,100 |
||
Net income |
$ 7,100 |
Problem 3-43 (20 minutes)
Journal entries: |
|||||||
Raw-Material Inventory |
33,000 | ||||||
Accounts Payable |
|||||||
460 |
|||||||
Raw-Material Inventory |
|||||||
100 | |||||||
Manufacturing-Supplies Inventory |
|||||||
(d) | 8,000 | ||||||
Accumulated Depreciation: Building |
|||||||
(e) |
|||||||
Cash |
|||||||
(f) |
34,000 |
||||||
Wages Payable |
|||||||
To record direct-labor cost [(1,000 + 700) x $20]. |
|||||||
20,400 |
|||||||
To apply manufacturing overhead to work in process ($20,400 = 1,700$12 per hour). |
|||||
(g) |
910 |
||||
Property Taxes Payable |
|||||
(h) |
|||||
(i) |
14,400 |
||||
Work-in-Process Inventory |
Problem 3-43 (continued)
(j) |
Accounts Receivable |
13,500 |
|||||
Sales Revenue |
|||||||
Cost of Goods Sold |
10,800 * |
||||||
Finished-Goods Inventory |
10,800 | ||||||
*$10,800 = (9/12)($14,400) |
Problem 3-44 (25 minutes)
The completed T-accounts are shown below. (Missing amounts in problem are italicized.) |
Accounts Payable | |||||||
Bal. 1/1 |
|||||||
135,000 |
120,000 |
136,500 |
|||||
Bal. 12/31 |
36,000 | ||||||
17,000 |
12,000 |
||||||
Direct |
120,000 |
Bal. 12/31 |
718,000 20,000 |
710,000 |
|||
Direct |
150,000 |
718,000 |
|||||
Mfg. |
450,000 |
||||||
19,000 |
|||||||
452,500 |
|||||||
810,000 |
|||||||
2,000 | |||||||
147,000 |
11,000 | ||||||
5,000 |
806,000 |
||||||
15,000 |
PROBLEM 3-45 (35 MINUTES)
1. Predetermined overhead rate = budgeted overhead ÷ budgeted machine hours = $840,000 ÷ 16,000 = $52.50 per machine hour
2. (a) Work-in-Process Inventory 80,000* Raw-Material Inventory 80,000
Work-in-Process Inventory 130,800** Wages Payable 130,800
*
$21
,000 + $44,000 +
$15,000
=
$80,000
** $35,000 + $22,000 + $65,000 + $8,800 = $130,800
(b) Manufacturing Overhead 238,500 Accumulated Depreciation 34,000 Wages Payable 60,000 Manufacturing Supplies Inventory 5,000 Miscellaneous Accounts 139,500
(c) Work-in-Process Inventory 231,000* Manufacturing Overhead 231,000
* (1,200 + 700 + 2,000 + 500) x $52.50 = $231,000
(d) Finished-Goods Inventory 315,250* Work-in-Process Inventory 315,250
* Job 64: $84,000 + $21,000 + $35,000 + (1,200 x $52.50) = $203,000
Job 65: $53,500 + $22,000 + (700 x $52.50) = $
112
,250
$315,250 = $203,000 + $112,250
(e) Accounts Receivable…………………………………………… 146,950*
Sales Revenue 146,950
* $112,250 + $34,700 = $146,950
Cost of Goods Sold 112,250
Finished-Goods Inventory 112,250
3. Job no. 66 and no. 67 are in production as of
March
31:
Job 66: $44,000 + $65,000 + (2,000 x $52.50) $214,000
Job 67: $15,000 + $8,800 + (500 x $52.50) 50,050
Total $264,050
PROBLEM 3-45 (CONTINUED)
4. Finished-goods inventory increased by $203,000 ($315,250 – $112,250).
5. The company’s actual overhead amounted to $238,500, whereas applied overhead totaled $231,000. Thus, overhead was underapplied by $7,500.
PROBLEM 3-46 (35 MINUTES)
1. Predetermined overhead rate = budgeted overhead ÷ budgeted direct-labor cost = $5,460,000 ÷ $4,200,000 = 130% of direct labor cost
2. Additions (debits) total $15,605,000 [$5,600,000 + $4,350,000 + ($4,350,000 x 130%)].
3. The finished-goods inventory consisted of job no. 2143, which cost $351,500 [$156,000 + $85,000 + ($85,000 x 130%)].
4. Since there is no work in process at year-end, all amounts in the Work-in-Process account must be transferred to Finished-Goods Inventory. Thus:
Finished-Goods Inventory 15,76
1,800
*
Work-in-Process Inventory 15,761,800
*Beginning balance in Work-in-Process Inventory + additions to the account:
$156,800 + $15,605,000 =
$15,761,800
5. Finlon’s applied overhead totals 130% of direct-labor cost, or $5,655,000 ($4,350,000 x 130%). Actual overhead was $5,554,000, itemized as follows, resulting in overapplied overhead of $101,000.
Indirect materials used |
$ 65,000 |
2,860,000 |
|
Factory depreciation |
1,740,000 |
Factory insurance |
59,000 |
Factory utilities |
830,000 |
$5,554,000 |
Manufacturing Overhead 101,000
Cost of Goods Sold 101,000
PROBLEM 3-46 (CONTINUED)
6. The company’s cost of goods sold totals $15,309,300:
Finished-goods inventory, Jan. 1……………. |
$ 0 |
Add: Cost of goods manufactured………….. |
15,761,800 |
Cost of goods available for sale……………… |
$15,761,800 |
Less: Finished-goods inventory, Dec. 31….. |
351,500 |
Unadjusted cost of goods sold………………. |
$15,410,300 |
Less: Overapplied overhead…………………. |
101,000 |
Cost of goods sold……………………………… |
$15,309,300 |
7. No, selling and administrative expenses are operating expenses of the firm and are treated as period costs rather than product costs. Such costs are unrelated to manufacturing overhead and cost of goods sold.
PROBLEM 3-47 (30 MINUTES)
1.
Traceable
costs total $2,500,000, computed as follows:
Total Cost |
Percent Traceable |
Traceable Cost |
||
Professional staff salaries……… |
80% |
$2,000,000 |
||
Administrative support staff…… |
300,000 |
60 |
180,000 | |
Travel………………………………. |
250,000 |
90 |
225,000 |
|
Photocopying…………………….. |
50 ,000 |
45,000 |
||
Other operating costs…………… |
100,000 |
50 |
50,000 |
|
Total……………………………. |
$3,200,000 |
$2,500,000 |
JLR’s overhead (i.e., the nontraceable costs) total $700,000 ($3,200,000 – $2,500,000).
2. Predetermined overhead rate = budgeted overhead ÷ traceable costs = $700,000 ÷ $2,500,000 = 28% of traceable costs
3. Target profit percentage = target profit ÷ total cost
= $640,000 ÷ $3,200,000 = 20% of cost
PROBLEM 3-47 (CONTINUED)
4. The total cost of the Martin Manufacturing project is
$64,000
, and the billing is $76,800, as follows:
Professional staff salaries… ……… |
$41,000 |
Administrative support staff……… |
2,600 |
Travel………………………………….. |
4,500 |
Photocopying………………………… |
500 |
Other operating costs………………. |
1,400 |
Subtotal…………………………… |
$50,000 |
Overhead ($50,000 x 28%)…………. |
14,000 |
Total cost …………………………. |
$64,000 |
Markup ($64,000 x 20%)……………. |
12,800 |
Billing to Martin……………………… |
$76,800 |
5. Possible nontraceable costs include utilities, rent, depreciation, advertising, top management salaries, and insurance.
6. Professional staff members are compensated for attending training sessions and firm-wide planning meetings, paid vacations, and completion of general, non-client-related paperwork and reports. These activities benefit multiple clients, the consultant, and/or the overall firm, making traceability to specific clients difficult if not impossible.
PROBLEM 3-48 (30 MINUTES)
NOTE: Actual selling and administrative expense, although given in the exercise, is irrelevant to the solution.
1. Machining Dept. overhead rate = budgeted overhead ÷ budgeted machine hours
= $4,000,000 ÷ 400,000 = $10 per machine hour
Assembly Dept. overhead rate = budgeted overhead ÷ budgeted direct-labor cost
= $3,080,000 ÷ $5,600,000 = 55% of direct-labor cost
PROBLEM 3-48 (CONTINUED)
2. The ending work-in-process inventory is carried at a cost of $153,530, computed as follows:
Machining Department: |
||
Direct material…………………………………… |
$24,500 |
|
Direct labor………………………………………. |
27,900 |
|
Manufacturing overhead (360 x $10)………… |
3,600 |
$ 56,000 |
Assembly Department: |
||
$ 6,700 |
||
58,600 |
||
Manufacturing overhead ($58,600 x 55%)….. |
32,230 |
97,530 |
Total cost……………………………………………… |
$153,530 |
3. Actual overhead in the Machining Department amounted to $4,260,000, whereas applied overhead totaled $4,250,000 (425,000 hours x $10). Thus, overhead was underapplied by $10,000 during the year.
4. Actual overhead in the Assembly Department amounted to $3,050,000, whereas applied overhead totaled $3,179,000 ($5,780,000 x 55%). Thus, overhead was overapplied by $129,000.
5. The company’s manufacturing overhead was overapplied by $119,000 ($129,000 – $10,000). As a result, excessive overhead flowed from Work-in-Process Inventory, to Finished-Goods Inventory, to Cost of Goods Sold, meaning that the Cost of Goods Sold account must be decreased at year-end.
6. The Work-in-Process account is charged with applied overhead, or $7,429,000 ($4,250,000 + $3,179,000).
7. The firm’s selection of cost drivers (or application bases) seems appropriate. There should be a strong correlation between the cost driver and the amount of overhead incurred. In the Machining Department, much of the overhead is probably related to the operation of machines. Similarly, in the Assembly Department, a considerable portion of the overhead incurred is related to manual assembly (i.e., labor) operations.
Problem 3-49 (25 minutes)
1.
7,850 |
|||
180 | |||
30 | |||
800 | |||
75,000 | |||
Selling and Administrative Expense |
1,800 | ||
Prepaid Insurance |
|||
3,000 | |||
Accounts Payable | |||
7,000 | |||
Accumulated Depreciation: Equipment |
|||
(k) |
1,100 |
||
Problem 3-49 (Continued)
(l) |
140,000 * |
||
140,000 | |||
*Applied manufacturing overhead = 7,000 machine hours$20 per hour. |
|||
(m) |
176,000 |
||
139,000 |
|||
Problem 3-50 (45 minutes)
Huron Corporation |
||
Raw material inventory, 12/31/x1 |
$ 89,000 |
|
731,000 |
||
$820,000 |
||
Deduct: Raw-material inventory, 12/31/x2 |
59,000 |
|
$761,000 |
||
474,000 |
||
$ 45,000 |
||
125,000 |
||
60,000 | ||
70,000 | ||
90,000 | ||
40,000 |
||
$580,000 |
||
Deduct: Underapplied overhead* |
2,500 |
|
577,500 |
||
$1,812,500 |
||
Add: Work-in-process inventory, 12/31/x1 |
-0- |
|
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, 12/31/x2 |
40,000 |
|
$1,772,500 |
*The Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured lists the manufacturing costs applied to work in process. Therefore, the underapplied overhead, $2,500, must be deducted from total actual overhead to arrive at the amount of overhead applied to work in process. If there had been overapplied overhead, the balance would have been added to total manufacturing overhead.
The amount of underapplied overhead is found by subtracting the applied manufacturing overhead, $577,500, from the total actual manufacturing overhead, $580,000.
Problem 3-50 (Continued)
Huron Corporation |
|
Finished-goods inventory, 12/31/x1 |
$ 35,000 |
Add: cost of goods manufactured |
1,772,500 |
$1,807,500 |
|
Deduct: Finished-goods inventory, 12/31/x2 |
|
$1,767,500 |
|
Add: Underapplied overhead* |
2,500 |
Cost of goods sold (adjusted for underapplied overhead) |
$1,770,000 |
*The company closes underapplied or overapplied overhead into cost of goods sold. Hence the $2,500 balance in underapplied overhead is added to cost of goods sold for the month.
Huron Corporation |
||
$2,105,000 |
||
1,770,000 |
||
$ 335,000 |
||
Selling and administrative expenses |
269,000 |
|
$ 66,000 |
||
25,000 |
||
$ 41,000 |
4. In the electronic version of the solutions manual, press the CTRL key and click on the following link: Build a Spreadsheet 03-50.xls
Problem 3-51 (15 minutes)
1.
$40,000
. Since there was no work-in-process inventory at the beginning of 20×2, all of the costs in the year-end work-in-process inventory were incurred during 20×2.
2. The direct-material cost would have been larger, probably by roughly 20 percent, because direct material is a variable cost.
3. Depreciation is a fixed cost, so it would not have been any larger if the firm’s volume had increased.
Problem 3-51 (Continued)
4. Only the $30,000 of equipment depreciation would have been included in manufacturing overhead on the Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured. The $30,000 of depreciation related to selling and administrative equipment would have been treated as a period cost and expensed during 20×2.
Problem 3-52 (30 minutes)
Marco Polo Map Company |
|||
Raw-material inventory, March 1 |
$ 17,000 |
||
Add: March purchases of raw material |
1 13,000 |
||
$130,000 |
|||
Deduct: Raw-material inventory, March 31 |
26,000 |
||
Raw materials used |
$104,000
|
||
160,000 |
|||
Manufacturing overhead applied (50% of direct labor) |
80 ,000 |
||
$344,000 |
|||
Add: Work-in-process inventory, March 1 |
40,000 |
||
$384,000 |
|||
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, | |||
March 31 (90%$40,000) |
36,000 |
||
$348,000 |
† |
*Work upward from the bottom of the statement, using the information available. Direct labor + manufacturing overhead = total manufacturing costs – direct material cost = $344,000 – $104,000 = $240,000. Since manufacturing overhead = 50% of direct labor, then manufacturing overhead = $80,000 and direct labor =
$160,000
.
†Cost of goods manufactured = cost of goods sold + increase in finished-goods inventory
= $345,000 + $3,000 = $348,000.
Problem 3-52 (Continued)
Marco Polo Map Company |
|
Beginning inventory |
|
Deduct: Ending inventory |
|
Raw material used | $104,000 |
160,000 |
|
Total prime costs |
$264,000 |
Marco Polo Map Company |
|
$160,000 | |
Manufacturing overhead applied (50% of direct labor) |
80,000 |
Total conversion cost |
$240,000 |
Problem 3-53 (30 minutes)
Calculation of applied manufacturing overhead: |
|
Applied manufacturing overhead = machine hrs. used x predetermined overhead rate $20,000 = 4,000 hrs. x $5 per hr. |
|
Underapplied overhead |
actual overhead – applied overhead |
$26,000 – $20,000 |
|
Problem 3-53 (continued)
Calculation of proration amounts: |
Account |
Explanation |
Amount* |
Percentage |
Calculation |
Job P82 only |
$ 2,500 |
12.5% |
2,500 20,000 |
|
Job N08 only |
12,500 |
62.5% |
12,500 20,000 |
|
Cost of Goods | ||||
Sold |
Job A79 only |
5,000 |
25.0% |
5,000 20,000 |
$20,000 |
100.0% |
|||
*Machine hours used on jobpredetermined overhead rate. |
Account
Underapplied Overhead
Percentage
Amount Added
to Account
Work in Process
$6,000
12.5%
$ 750
Finished Goods
6,000
62.5%
3,750
Cost of Goods Sold
6,000
25.0%
1,500
Total
$6,000
(b)
Journal entry:
Work-in-Process Inventory
750
Finished-Goods Inventory
3,750
Cost of Goods Sold
1,500
Manufacturing Overhead
6,000
Problem 3-54 (40 minutes)
1. In accordance with the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice, the appropriateness of Marc Jackson’s three alternative courses of action is described as follows:
(a) Follow Brown’s directive and do nothing further. This action is inappropriate as Jackson has ethical responsibilities to take further action in accordance with the following standards of ethical conduct.
Problem 3-54 (continued)
Competence:
· Maintain an appropriate level of professional expertise by continually developing knowledge and skills.
· Perform professional duties in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and technical standards.
· Provide decision support information and recommendations that are accurate, clear, concise, and timely.
· Recognize and communicate professional limitations or other constraints that would preclude responsible judgment or successful performance of an activity.
Integrity:
· Mitigate actual conflicts of interest. Regularly communicate with business associates to avoid apparent conflicts of interest. Advise all parties of any potential conflicts.
· Refrain from engaging in any conduct that would prejudice carrying out duties ethically.
· Abstain from engaging in or supporting any activity that might discredit the profession.
Credibility:
· Communicate information fairly and objectively.
· Disclose all relevant information that could reasonably be expected to influence an intended user’s understanding of the reports, analyses, or recommendations.
· Disclose delays or deficiencies in information, timeliness, processing, or internal controls in conformance with organization policy and/or applicable law.
(b) Attempt to convince Brown to make the proper adjustments and to advise the external auditors of her actions. This action is appropriate as Jackson has taken the ethical conflict to his immediate superior for resolution. Unless Jackson suspects that his superior is involved, this alternative is the first step for the resolution of an ethical conflict.
Problem 3-54 (continued)
(c) Tell the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors about the problem and give them the appropriate accounting data. This action is not appropriate as a first step since the resolution of ethical conflicts requires Jackson to first discuss the matter with his immediate superior.
2. The next step that Jackson should take in resolving this conflict is to inform Brown that he is planning to discuss the conflict with the next higher managerial level. Jackson should pursue discussions with successively higher levels of management, including the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors, until the matter is satisfactorily resolved. At the same time, Jackson should “clarify relevant concepts by confidential discussion with an objective advisor to obtain an understanding of possible courses of action.” If the ethical conflict still exists after exhausting all levels of internal review, Jackson may have no course other than to resign from the organization.
Problem 3-55 (25 minutes)
Quarter |
Predetermined Overhead Rate |
Calculations |
||||||||
1st |
$ 4 per hour
|
$100 ,000/25,000 |
||||||||
2nd |
5 per hour |
$80,000/16,000 |
||||||||
3rd |
4 per hour |
$50,000/12,500 |
||||||||
4th |
$70,000 /14,000 |
|||||||||
January |
April |
|||||||||
$100 | ||||||||||
300 | ||||||||||
20 hrs$4 per hr |
80 | |||||||||
20 hrs$5 per hr |
____ |
100 |
||||||||
Total cost |
$480 |
$500 |
||||||||
Markup (10%) |
48 |
50 |
||||||||
Price |
$528 |
$550 |
||||||||
$100.00 |
||||||||||
300.00 |
||||||||||
Manufacturing overhead (20 hrs $4.44) |
88.80 |
|||||||||
$488.80 |
Problem 3-55 (Continued)
6. | ||||
48.88 |
||||
$537.68 |
Notice that with quarterly overhead rates, the firm may underprice its product in January and overprice it in April.
Problem 3-56 (45 minutes)
Predetermined overhead rate: |
$5.05 per direct-labor hour |
*Budgeted manufacturing overhead = variable overhead + fixed overhead $606,000 = $390,000 + $216,000 |
2.
Cost of job 77:
Cost in beginning work-in-process inventory
$ 54,000
Direct material
Direct labor (3,500 hours$24.00 per hour)*
84,000
Applied manufacturing overhead
(3,500 hours$5.05 per hour)
17,675
Total cost
$200,675
3.
Manufacturing overhead applied to job 79:
Direct-labor hourspredetermined overhead rate 2,000 hours$5.05 per hour
$10,100
Problem 3-56 (continued)
Total manufacturing overhead applied during November: |
|||
Total direct-labor hourspredetermined overhead rate 8,500 hours$5.05 |
|||
$42,925 |
|||
Actual manufacturing overhead incurred during November: |
|||
Indirect material (supplies) |
$12,000 |
||
Indirect-labor wages |
|||
Supervisory salaries |
|||
Building occupancy costs, factory facilities |
|||
Production equipment costs |
|||
Total |
$47,500 |
||
Underapplied overhead for November: |
|||
Actual manufacturing overhead – applied manufacturing overhead |
|||
$47,500 – $42,925 |
|||
$4,575 underapplied |
Problem 3-57 (75 minutes)
(c)
Work-in-Process Inventory
11,250*
Raw-Material Inventory
11,250
*(250 sq. ft.$5 per sq. ft.) + (1,000 lbs.$10 per lb.)
Manufacturing Overhead**
100
Manufacturing-Supplies Inventory
100
**Valve lubricant is an indirect material, so it is considered an overhead cost.
(d)
Work-in-Process Inventory
34,000
Manufacturing Overhead
13,000
Wages Payable
47,000
Work-in-Process Inventory
35,700*
Manufacturing Overhead
35,700
*Applied manufacturing overhead = 1,700 direct-labor hours$21 per hour.
(e)
Manufacturing Overhead
12,000
Accumulated Depreciation: Building and
Equipment
12,000
(f)
Manufacturing Overhead
1,200
Cash
1,200
Problem 3-57 (continued)
Problem 3-57 (continued)
3,100 | |
Selling and Administrative Expenses |
|
(k)
Selling and Administrative Expenses
4,000
Accumulated Depreciation: Buildings and
Equipment
4,000
(l)
Selling and Administrative Expenses
1,000
Cash
1,000
(m)
Finished-Goods Inventory
34,050
*
Work-in-Process Inventory
*Cost of Job
T81
:
Direct material (250$5)
$ 1,250
Direct labor (800$20)
16,000
Manufacturing overhead (800$21)
16,800
Total cost
$34,050
(n)
Accounts Receivable
26,600
*
Sales Revenue
*(76 2)$700 per trombone
.
Cost of Goods Sold
17,025
**
Finished-Goods Inventory
**17,025 = $34,050 2
Problem 3-57 (continued)
T-accounts and posting of journal entries: |
|||
Cash | |||
Bal | 10,000 | 13,000 | |
Accounts Receivable
Wages Payable
21,000
8,000
Bal.
(n)
26,600
47,000
(d)
Accumulated Depreciation:
Prepaid Insurance
Buildings and Equipment
Bal.
5,000
102,000
Bal.
3,100
(i)
12,000
(e)
4,000
(k)
Manufacturing-Supplies Inventory
Manufacturing Overhead
Bal.
500
(c)
100
35,700
(d)
100
(c)
(d)
13,000
(e)
12,000
(f)
1,200
(g)
2,100
(h)
2,400
(i)
3,100
Raw-Material Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold
Bal.
149,000
(n)
17,025
(a)
5,000
11,250
(c)
(b)
4,000
Selling and Administrative
Work-in-Process Inventory
Expenses
Bal.
91,000
(j)
8,000
(c)
11,250
34,050
(m)
(k)
4,000
(d)
34,000
(l)
1,000
(d)
35,700
Problem 3-57 (continued)
220,000 |
4.
(a)
Calculation of actual overhead:
Indirect material (valve lubricant)
$ 100
Indirect labor
13,000
Depreciation: factory building and equipment
12,000
Rent: warehouse
1,200
Utilities
2,100
Property taxes
2,400
Insurance
3,100
Total actual overhead
$33,900
(b)
Overapplied overhead
=
=
$33,900 – $35,700*
=
$1,800 overapplied
*$35,700 = 1,700 direct-labor hours$21 per hour.
(c)
Manufacturing Overhead
1,800
Cost of Goods Sold
1,800
Problem 3-57 (Continued)
Scholastic Brass Corporation |
||
$149,000 |
||
9,000 |
||
$158,000 |
||
146,750 |
||
$ 11,250 |
||
$ 100 |
||
Depreciation on factory building and equipment |
12,000 |
|
Rent: Warehouse |
1,200 |
|
2,100 |
||
2,400 |
||
3,100 |
||
$33,900 |
||
Add: overapplied overhead* |
1,800 |
|
35,700 |
||
$ 80,950 |
||
91,000 |
||
$171,950 |
||
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, March 31 |
137,900 |
|
Cost of goods manufactured† |
$ 34,050 |
*The Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured lists the manufacturing costs applied to work in process. Therefore, the overapplied overhead, $1,800, must be added to actual overhead to arrive at the amount of overhead applied to work in process during March.
†Cost of Job T81, which was completed during March.
Problem 3-57 (Continued)
Scholastic Brass Corporation |
|
Finished-goods inventory, March 1 |
$220,000 |
34,050 |
|
$254,050 |
|
Deduct: Finished-goods inventory, March 31 |
237,025 |
$ 17,025 |
|
Deduct: Overapplied overhead* |
|
$ 15,225 |
*The company closes underapplied or overapplied overhead into cost of goods sold. Hence the balance in overapplied overhead is deducted from cost of goods sold for the month.
7. |
Scholastic Brass Corporation |
|
$26,600 |
||
15,225 |
||
$11,375 |
||
13,000 |
||
Income (loss) |
$ (1,625) |
Problem 3-58 (20 minutes)
T81 |
Trombones |
|||
March 5 |
March 20 |
|||
76 | ||||
3/5 |
112 | 250 |
$5.00 |
$1,250 |
3/8 to 3/12 |
3-08 through 3-12 |
$20 | $16,000 | |
$21 |
$16,800 |
|||
Total direct material Total direct labor Total manufacturing overhead |
$ 1,250 16,000 16,800 |
|||
Total cost |
$34,050 |
|||
Unit cost |
$448.03* |
|||
March | 38 |
$17,025† |
*Rounded
†$17,025 = $34,050 ÷ 2
Problem 3-59 (55 minutes)
The answers to the questions are as follows: |
||||
$216,000 |
$60,000 |
|||
$19,000 |
$150,000 |
|||
$70,000 | 8. | $40,000 | ||
$ 38,000 |
9. | $15,000 | ||
$80,000 |
10. |
Zero |
||
The completed T accounts, along with supporting calculations, follow. |
||||
Bal. 10/31 |
||||
40,000 | 81,000 | |||
Bal. 11/30 |
1,000 |
|||
35,000 | ||||
material |
||||
labor |
80,000 | |||
38,000 |
Manufacturing Overhead
Sales Revenue
60,000
60,000
216,000
Wages Payable
Accounts Receivable
1,000
Bal. 10/31
Bal. 10/31
8,000
79,500
80,000
216,000
205,000
1,500
Bal. 11/30
Bal. 11/30
19,000
Supporting Calculations:
1.
Sales revenue
=
cost of goods sold120%
=
$180,000120%
=
$216,000
Problem 3-59 (continued)
2.
Ending balance in accounts receivable
=
beginning balance + sales revenue
– collections
=
$8,000 + $216,000 – $205,000
=
$19,000
3.
Purchases of raw material
=
addition to accounts payable
Addition to accounts payable
=
ending balance + payments
– beginning balance
=
$1,000 + $81,000 – $12,000
=
$70,000
4.
November 30 balance in work-in-process inventory
=
direct
material
+
direct
labor
+
manufacturing
overhead
=
$20,500 + (500)($20) + (500)($15*)
=
$38,000
*Predetermined overhead rate
=
=
=
$15 per direct-labor hour
=
5.
Addition to work in process
for direct labor
=
November credit to
wages payable
November credit to
wages payable
=
ending balance + payments – beginning balance
=
$1,500
+ $79,500 – $1,000
=
$80,000
Problem 3-59 (continued)
6.
November applied overhead
=
direct labor hourspredetermined overhead rate
=
4,000*$15
=
$60,000
Direct labor hours
=
=
7.
Cost of goods completed during November
=
beginning balance in work in process
+
additions during November
–
ending balance in work in process
=
$8,000 + ($40,000 + $80,000 + $60,000) – $38,000
=
$150,000
8.
Raw material used in November
=
November credit to raw-material inventory
=
$40,000 (given)
9.
October 31 balance in
raw-material inventory
=
November 30 balance in raw-material inventory
+
direct material used
–
purchases
=
$45,000 + $40,000 – $70,000
=
$15,000
10.
Overapplied or underapplied overhead = actual overhead – applied overhead
= $60,000 – $60,000
= 0
Problem 3-60 (50 minutes)
Schedule of budgeted overhead costs: |
||||
Department A |
Department B |
|||
Variable overhead |
||||
A 20,000$16 |
$320,000 |
|||
B 20,000$4 |
$ 80,000 |
|||
Fixed overhead |
200,000 |
|||
Total overhead |
$520,000 |
$280,000 |
||
Grand total of budgeted overhead (A + B): |
$800,000 |
|||
Product prices: |
||||
Basic |
Advanced System |
|||
$1,100 |
$1,500 | |||
Markup, 10% of cost |
110 |
150 |
||
$1,210 |
$1,650 |
|||
Departmental overhead rates : |
||||
Budgeted overhead
(from requirement 1) |
$280,000 | |||
Budgeted direct-labor hours |
20,000 |
|||
Predetermined overhead rates |
$520,000 | |||
$26 per |
$14 per |
|||
direct-labor | ||||
hour |
Problem 3-60 (Continued)
New product costs: |
|||
Advanced | |||
System | |||
$ 400 |
$ 800 |
||
300 |
|||
Department A: |
|||
Basic system 5$26 |
130 |
||
Advanced system 15$26 |
390 |
||
Department B: |
|||
Basic system 15$14 |
210 |
||
Advanced system 5$14 |
_ ____ |
70 |
|
$1,040 |
$1,560 |
||
New product prices: |
|||
104 |
156 |
||
Price |
$1,144 |
$1,716 |
Problem 3-60 (Continued)
TeleTech Corporation |
President, TeleTech Corporation |
I. M. Student |
Departmental overhead rates |
Until now the company has used a single, plantwide overhead rate in computing product costs. This approach resulted in a product cost of $1,100 for the basic system and a cost of $1,500 for the advanced system. Under the company’s pricing policy of adding a 10 percent markup, this yielded prices of $1,210 for the basic system and $1,650 for the advanced system.
When departmental overhead rates are computed, it is apparent that the two production departments have very different cost structures. Department A is a relatively expensive department to operate, while Department B is less costly. It is important to recognize the different rates of cost incurrence in the two departments, because our two products require different amounts of time in the two departments. The basic system spends most of its time in Department B, the inexpensive department. The advanced system spends most of its time in Department A, the more expensive department. Thus, using departmental overhead rates shows that the basic system costs less than we had previously realized; the advanced system costs more. The revised product costs are $1,040 and $1,560 for the basic and advanced systems, respectively. With a 10 percent markup, these revised product costs yield prices of $1,144 for the basic system and $1,716 for the advanced system. We have been overpricing the basic system and underpricing the advanced system.
I recommend that the company switch to a product costing system that incorporates departmental overhead rates.
solutions to cases
Case 3-61 (45 minutes)
A job-order costing system is appropriate in any environment where costs can be readily identified with specific products, batches, contracts, or projects. This situation typically occurs in a manufacturing setting when relatively small numbers of heterogeneous products are produced. |
||
The only job remaining in CompuFurn’s work-in-process inventory on December 31 is job PS812. The cost of job PS812 can be calculated as follows: |
||
Job PS812 balance, 11/30 ……… |
$250,000 |
|
December additions: |
||
Direct material |
$124,000 |
|
Purchased parts |
87,000 |
|
Direct labor |
200,500 |
|
Manufacturing overhead (19,500 machine hrs$5*) |
97,500 |
509,000 |
Work-in-process inventory, 12/31 |
$759,000 |
|
The cost of the chairs remaining in CompuFurn’s finished-goods inventory on December 31 is $455,600, calculated as follows: · Units of chairs in finished-goods inventory on December 31: |
||
Chair Units |
||
Finished-goods inventory, 11/30 |
19,400 |
|
Add: Units completed in December |
15,000 | |
Units available |
34,400 |
|
Deduct: Units shipped in December |
21,000 | |
Finished-goods inventory, 12/31 |
13,400 |
Case 3-61 (Continued)
Since CompuFurn uses the first-in, first-out (FIFO) inventory method, all units remaining in finished- goods inventory were completed in December. |
|
· Unit cost of chairs completed in December: |
|
Work in process inventory, 11/30 |
$431,000 |
Direct material |
$ 3,000 |
43,200 |
|
Manufacturing overhead (4,400 machine hrs$5) |
22,000 |
$510,000 |
|
Unit cost = = = $34 per unit |
|
· Cost of finished-goods inventory |
= unit cost quantity |
= $34 13,400 |
|
= $455,600 |
Overapplied overhead is $7,500, calculated as follows: |
||
Machine hours used: |
||
January through November |
830,000 | |
December |
49,900 |
|
879,900 |
||
Applied manufacturing overhead = 879,900 machine hours $5 = $4,399,500 Actual manufacturing overhead: |
||
$4,140,000 |
||
252,000 |
||
$4,392,000 |
||
Overapplied overhead |
= applied overhead actual overhead |
|
= $4,399,500 $4,392,000 |
||
= $7,500 |
Case 3-61 (Continued)
5. If the amount of overapplied or underapplied overhead is not significant, the amount is generally treated as a period cost and closed to Cost of Goods Sold. If the amount is significant, the amount is sometimes prorated over the relevant accounts, i.e., Work-in-Process Inventory, Finished-Goods Inventory, and Cost of Goods Sold.
Case 3-62 (50 minutes)
Manufacturers use predetermined overhead rates to allocate to production jobs the production costs that are not directly traceable to specific jobs. As a result, management will have timely, accurate job-cost information. Predetermined overhead rates are easy to apply and avoid fluctuations in job costs caused by changes in production volume or overhead costs throughout the year. |
|
The manufacturing overhead applied through November 30 is calculated as follows: |
|
Machine hourspredetermined overhead rate |
overhead applied |
73,000$15 |
$1,095,000 |
3.
The manufacturing overhead applied in December is calculated as follows:
Machine hourspredetermined overhead rate
=
overhead applied
6,000$15
=
$90,000
4.
Underapplied manufacturing overhead through December 31 is calculated as follows:
Actual overhead ($1,100,000 + $96,000)
$1,196,000
Applied overhead ($1,095,000 + $90,000)
(1,185,000)
Underapplied overhead
$ 11,000
Case 3-62 (continued)
The balance the Finished-Goods Inventory account on December 31 is comprised only of Job No. N11-013 and is calculated as follows: |
|
November 30 balance for Job No. N11-013 |
$55,000 |
December direct material |
|
December direct labor |
|
December overhead (1,000$15) |
15,000 |
Total finished-goods inventory |
$86,000 |
6.
FiberCom’s Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured for the year just completed is constructed as follows:
FiberCom Company
Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured
For the Year Ended December 31
Direct material:
Raw-material inventory, 1/1
$ 105,000
Raw-material purchases ($965,000 + $98,000)
1,063,000
Raw material available for use
$1,168,000
Deduct: Indirect material used ($125,000 + $9,000)
$134,000
Raw-material inventory 12/31
85,000
219,000
Raw material used
$ 949,000
Direct labor ($845,000 + $80,000)
925,000
Manufacturing overhead:
Indirect material ($125,000 + $9,000)
$134,000
Indirect labor ($345,000 + $30,000)
375,000
Utilities ($245,000 + $22,000)
267,000
Depreciation ($385,000 + $35,000)
420,000
Total actual manufacturing overhead
1,196,000
Deduct: Underapplied overhead
11,000
Overhead applied to work in process
$1,185,000
Total manufacturing costs
$3,059,000
Add: Work-in-process inventory, 1/1
60,000
Subtotal
$3,119,000
Deduct: Work-in-process inventory, 12/31*
150,200
Cost of goods manufactured
$2,968,800
*Supporting calculations follow.
Case 3-62 (Continued)
*Supporting calculations for work in process 12/31:
D12-002
D12-003
Total
Direct material
$37,900
$26,000
$ 63,900
Direct labor
20,000
16,800
36,800
Applied overhead:
2,500 hrs.$15
37,500
37,500
800 hrs.$15
______
$12,000
12,000
Total
$95,400
$54,800
$150,200
3-58 Solutions Manual
© 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Managerial Accounting, 11/e 3-57
© 2017 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
(rounded)
chicken
per
$.43
300,000
,000)
($.10)(300
$100,000
rate
Overhead
=
+
=
chicken
per
$.35
400,000
,000)
($.10)(400
$100,000
rate
Overhead
=
+
=
´
¸
¸
hour
per
$13.30
hours
75,000
$997,500
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
driver
cost
of
level
budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
hours
machine
10,000
$364,000
hours
labor
–
direct
20,000
$364,000
*
$280,000
$364,000
ft.
sq.
per
$3
sets
20
set
per
ft.
sq.
100
$6,000
a
´
´
=
hour.
machine
per
$9
sets
20
hours
machine
3
$540
b
´
´
=
hour.
labor
–
direct
per
$4
sets
20
hours
labor
–
direct
40
$3,200
c
´
´
=
hour
per
$12
(10)
(2,000)
$240,000
hours
labor
–
direct
budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
=
r
hou
machine
per
$20
73,200
$1,464,000
hours
machine
budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
=
hour
machine
per
$5
47,000
$235,000
hours
machine
budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
=
hours
labor
–
direct
budgeted
annual
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
annual
rate
ned
Predetermi
=
(rounded)
hour
per
$4.44
67,500
$300,000
=
=
120,000
*
$606,000
hours
labor
–
direct
Budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
Budgeted
=
=
direct-labor wages
$204,000
*Direct-labor rate $24.00 per
hour
direct-labor hours8,500
===
=
volume
production
budgeted
overhead
budgeted
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
hour
labor
–
direct
per
$21
20,300
$426,300
hours
labor
–
direct
budgeted
overhead
ing
manufactur
budgeted
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
=
÷
÷
ø
ö
ç
ç
è
æ
–
÷
÷
ø
ö
ç
ç
è
æ
overhead
ing
manufactur
applied
overhead
ing
manufactur
actual
†
hours
labor
–
direct
budgeted
overhead
budgeted
48,000
$720,000
rate
labor
–
direct
cost
labor
–
direct
budgeted
=
48,000
$20
$960,000
=
rate
labor
–
direct
labor
direct
for
process
in
work
to
addition
hours
4,000
$20
$80,000
=
chicken
per
$.60
200,000
,000)
($.10)(200
$100,000
rate
Overhead
=
+
=
hour
per
$20
40,000
$800,000
hours
labor
–
direct
budgeted
total
rate
overhead
budgeted
total
rate
overhead
ned
Predetermi
=
=
=
hour
machine
per
$5
hours
900,000
$4,500,000
rate
overhead
ing
Manufactur
*
=
=
completed
units
cost
total
15,000
$510,000