Option #1: Sources of Technical Risks
- Identify an “intolerable technical risk” on a project with which you are familiar, or on one that you can research.
- Describe the issue that created the intolerable technical risk and describe the risk itself.
- Describe the treatment plan using cost-benefit analysis, where the risk severity is reduced to an acceptable level. (A risk register is not required for the paper with this option.)
Submission Requirements:
- For this assignment, you will be preparing your paper for submission to a conference or journal for publication, as well as submitting the paper to your instructor.
- You may submit the paper to your choice of outlet (conference or journal). Since you may be charged for your submission to some outlets, you should examine options for submission by searching the internet to find both the best fit for your paper and the acceptable cost to you. There are many journals and conferences that consider papers for publication. You might consider submitting to PMI Knowledge Shelf or AACEi Conferences (Links to an external site.). Another example is The Clute Institute (Links to an external site.), which publishes many journals and hosts conferences. Note that some journals accept undergraduate and/or graduate submissions. Visit the Council for Undergraduate Research (Links to an external site.) to learn more. Read about the journal and the types of research it is interested in publishing. Make sure you understand the journal’s submission guidelines. Some outlets require submissions in APA format and some do not; and some have special accommodations for student publications.
- This assignment does not require the student to submit the paper for publication, but it does require the student to prepare a scholarly paper **for potential submission to a selected publication outlet **with all the requisite academic and practical content in a format as stated in the publication guidelines. Again, the assignment includes that the student should identify the outlet, and deliver the scholarship and format of the paper in accordance with that publication’s style guidelines. The professor will not submit your paper to the publication outlet as that is at the discretion of the student. Actual submission to the outlet is not part of the assignment requirements, but submission in the outlet’s style guideline format to the instructor is.
- ******In an appendix after your references page, identify the following information for your submission: a) journal or conference name; b) why your paper is best suited for this outlet; and c) the submission guidelines in terms of process, requirements, cost, and general acceptance rates, if stated.
- *******Your paper must be 5 pages long, not including the required title and references pages and the appendix.
- Submit your paper in the format required by your selected outlet. (For example, if the outlet requires papers to be single spaced, then use single spacing.)
- *******Support your paper with a minimum of two current (no older than five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course lecture material you wish to use. You must also use the Fontaine (2016) reading as one of the sources in your paper.
Fontaine, M. (2016). Chapter 4 – Project risk management. In P.A.J. Green (Ed.), Enterprise Risk Management: A Common Framework for the Entire Organization. Waltham, MA: Elsevier
- Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources.
- Your entire paper must be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
PJM530 Mod 5 CT
| PJM530 Mod 5 CT | ||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements |
30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation The paper includes all of the required components specified in the assignment, including length, sources, risk register, and topics addressed. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. |
30.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent |
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of risk; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis |
30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. |
|||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources/Examples |
15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient. |
15.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates College-level Proficiency in Organization, Grammar, and Style |
10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Submission is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Submission is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment.Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Submission is poorly organized; does not follow proper format.Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Submission is not well organized or written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. |
10.0 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates Proper Use of APA Style |
10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation Submission contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Submission contains no more than two to three significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Submission contains four to five significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Submission contains more than five significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA. |
|||
|
Total Points: 125.0 |
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
