Nurs 6208 final project and guidelines


NURS 6208 FINAL PROJECT AND GUIDELINES

The contrivance must be emblemwritten, envelop spaced and very scant in protraction (apex 12 pages). Uses APA rules uprightly, including quotation and boards.

Part I 

A NP eliminationer randomly scantlingd 100 women senile 50-65 years and measured their minutes of drill in the departed week, BMI, and debasement. Debasement was measured using a Likert emblem flake consisting of 20 items. The summation jaw collocated from 20 to 100 and the remarkable the jaw, the remarkable the roll of debasement.  The correspondence coefficients (Pearson’s rs) are summarized in the subjoined board. For the analyses, statistical telling roll was set at α=0.05.

Table 1: correspondence shapeless minutes of drill, BMI and debasement
    Exercise in departed week (minutes)    BMI
BMI    -0.20    
Depression jaw    -0.30 (P<0.05)    0.21

1.    Write a elimination and vain hypotheses touching the kindred betwixt drill and debasement.
2.    Based on the criterion statistics in board 1, what is you blank touching your elimination theory? (Hint: debate twain the bulk and superscription of the kindred).
3.    What adjustment of estrangement is shared by minutes of drill and debasement shapeless women 50-65 years of age?
4.    For the kindred betwixt minutes of drill and BMI, what was the estimated authority of the statistical criterion? (Using the authority board on page 202, board 9.1, Polit 2010). What was the destroy that a emblem II fault was committed?
5.    If -0.20 is a good-natured-natured record of population amendment, what scantling bigness would be needed to close authority of 0.80 at α=0.05?

PART II. 

Using the “N6208 Final Contrivance Data”, picked two inconstants after a while suppositious or ordinal roll delineations, and execute the picturesque statistics (quantity and percentage).  [Please picked singly dichotomous inconstants from the subjoined list: worknow, destitution, smoker, PoorHealth]. Then execute the bi-variate picturesque statistics using crosstabulation. Hand compute the ARs, ARR, RR, and OR. Execute a chi-square partition. Write a narration after a while the subjoined sections: Introduction: Including the inconstants, delineation rolls, one bivariate elimination inquiry, and one theory.
Method: Include scantling style (scantling bigness, eligibility criteria) and statistical methods used for basis partition. (The scantling notification can be fix in “Polit Dataset Description” in SPSS Basis Sets folder).
 
Results: Include frequencies and percentages for the two inconstants, crosstabulation results, destroy condemnationes (ARs, ARR, RR, and OR), and chi-square criterion results. Include a fact resume of the results and resume board(s) for the results (Attach SPSS outputs).
Discussion: Write a narration including resume and definition of the findings narrationed in the prior sections not-absolute to the elimination inquirys you posed.

Part III. 

Run a one-way ANOVA using the basisset “N6208 Final Contrivance Data”. The Dataset contains 1000 cases from the peculiar PolitDatasetA. Two inconstants procure be used for this partition: Contentment and  Houseproblem.
The inconstant Househeight is created using the inconstant housprob, a resume condemnation of view inconstants environing prevalent housing heights for the women in this scantling—for development, whether or not they had their utilities cut off, had vermin in the intimate, had false hear, and so forth.  The inconstant housprob is a compute of the completion enumerate of times the women said “yes” to these view inquirys.  The inconstant housprob is recoded into Househeight domiciled on enumerate of housing heights. The coding for Househeight is: 1=no housing heights, 2=one housing height, and 3= two or more housing heights.
Satisfaction measures the overall willingment after a while esthetic sell-being. This inconstant is a summated rating flake inconstant for women’s responses to their limit of willingment after a while lewd aspects of their esthetic sell-being—their housing, living, wares, and investment for themselves and their effect. Each item was coded from 1 (very morose) to 4 (very pleased), so the overall jaw for the lewd items could collocate from a low of 4 (4 X 1) to 16 (4 X 4). Remarkable jaw indicates important willingment. This flake has an interior substance Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90. The willing fibre and build fibre keep been stated in prior elimination.
For this partition, use the inconstant Househeight as the fractions (group) inconstant and inconstant Contentment as the termination inconstant. To run the one-way ANOVA, click Analyze → Compare Media → Oneway.  In the hole tete-a-tete box, advance Contentment into the Dependent List and Househeight into the slot for Factor. Click the Options pushbutton, and click Descriptives and Homogeneity of Variance, then abide. Next, click the Post Hoc pushbutton and picked LSD.  Click abide, then OK, and counter-argument these inquirys:

1.    What are the moderation rolls of willingment in the three assemblys? Narration the moderation, SD, median, restriction, apex and scantling bigness in a board.
2.    Write a elimination inquiry.
3.    Write the elimination theory and the vain theory.
4.    What was the compute of the F statistic?
5.    What were the limits of immunity?
6.    What was the verisimilitude roll for the F statistic? Can the vain theory be exceptional?
7.    According to the LSD criterion, were any assembly moderations tellingly irrelative from any others? If yes, which ones?
8.    Write a chapter summarizing the results.
9.    Attach the apt SPSS printouts.
 


EVALUATIVE CRITERIA FINAL PROJECT
Criteria    5    4    3    2    1
Clarity of elimination inquirys and inconstants (1-4 pts)                    
Accurate style of methods (1-4 pts)                    
Thoroughness and atonement of results (1-4 pts)                    
Accuracy of definitions (1-5 pts)                    
Overall sort: logic, phraseology, APA format. (1-4 pts)                    
Total Score- max jaw 21 points                    
Legend:
1=inaccurate, all notification is crime or did not arrange an counter-argument to the inquiry 2=some notification is crime
3=most notification is considerate
4/5=all notification is considerate after a while proud sort on all aspects.