Can someone assist
Reflective Journal Template – Topic Reflection
|
Topic |
Debating Prenatal Debating |
|
What are the key points of contention on this topic? |
|
|
What side of the argument (stance) do you take on this topic? |
|
|
What strong points does the other side of this topic have? |
|
|
What were the three most important things you took away from the topic? 1. 2. 3. |
|
|
Which ethical theory (of the 6 approved ones ONLY – Kant; Act Utilitarianism; Rule Utilitarianism; Care Ethics; Virtue Ethics; and Social Contract) would you apply to this topic to defend your stance? Explain fully. 250 words. A) In this reflection you must first define the key terms of the debate (for example, define what Euthanasia/Abortion/Stem Cell/Public Health/PreNatal Testing/Animal Research/Health Care, etc. means and what are the different types depending on which topic you are discussing) B) Define and explain the ethical theory you chose (show me you know exactly what the theory is and does – in your own words) C) Present the evidence both pro and con and follow up how using your ethical theory is the best way to determine whether or not your stance is really ethical D) Conclusion – any final thoughts and opinions would go here E) 2 to 3 resources as support for your evidence (text book counts as 1) |
Debating
prenatal testing
In the scenari
o
assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented
scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you
already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowl
edge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic,
and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stanc
e, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to
defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1.
Complete the entire scenario.
2.
Compose your reflection in a Word document an
d be sure to address, at a
minimum, the following questions:
·
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
·
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is
the most ethical and why?
3.
Support your conclusions with evidence and
specific examples from the
textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
4.
Your reflection must be 1
–
2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and
citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
5.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Rubric
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the
presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you
already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1. Complete the entire scenario.
2. Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a
minimum, the following questions:
· Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
· Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
3. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the
textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
4. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and
citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
5. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time) of the assigned week
Rubric
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (2)
|
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (2) |
|||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues |
20 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations 15.8 to >11.8 pts Approaches Expectations 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations |
20 pts |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research |
20 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations 15.8 to >11.8 pts Approaches Expectations 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations |
||||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
10 to >7.9 pts Meets Expectations 7.9 to >5.9 pts Approaches Expectations 5.9 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations |
10 pts |
|||||
|
Total Points: 50 |
Learning Scenario Reflection (2)
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (2)
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues
20 to >15.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not identify an acceptable understanding of of the issues in the scenario.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20 to >15.8 pts
Meets Expectations
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues and the concepts studied in the course readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information, conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend points made.
15.8 to >11.8 pts
Approaches Expectations
Makes somewhat vague connections between identified issues and concepts studied in readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with limited research.
11.8 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements the reflection, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
10 to >7.9 pts
Meets Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 to >5.9 pts
Approaches Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
5.9 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or citations and references are missing.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Debating prenatal testing
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented
scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowl
edge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic,
and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stanc
e, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to
defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1.
Complete the entire scenario.
2.
Compose your reflection in a Word document an
d be sure to address, at a
minimum, the following questions:
o
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
o
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is
the most ethical and why?
3.
Support your conclusions with evidence and
specific examples from the
textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
4.
Your reflection must be 1
–
2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and
citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
5.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Rubric
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the
presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you
already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowl
edge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic,
and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stanc
e, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to
defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1.
Complete the entire scenario.
Debating prenatal testing
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented
scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you
already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic,
and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to
defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1. Complete the entire scenario.
2. Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a
minimum, the following questions:
o Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
o Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is
the most ethical and why?
3. Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the
textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
4. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and
citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
5. Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Rubric In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the
presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you
already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and
previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic,
and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and
discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to
defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
1. Complete the entire scenario.
Animal research is a necessary practice in the world of medical research, allowing scientists to develop life-saving interventions and to spot catastrophic problems before new techniques or products make their way to actual patients. However, this does not mean that we should deny that there are serious ethical issues involved.
Animal testing is not a pretty or pleasant process. It causes pain and suffering to animal subjects, and legitimate cases of abuse have been uncovered by animal rights groups. Consequently, the practice should be tightly regulated, and alternative methods should be employed whenever possible.
· Discuss a specific research study involving animals that had ethical issues.
· What were the ethical issues involved?
· What could have been done to conduct the research study differently to avoid these ethical issues?
· Which acceptable ethical theory forces you to consider the suffering of animals in its moral equations? Which acceptable ethical theories (yes more than one) consider animals non-ethical beings and therefore not worthy of being included for protection?
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
