rubric1 USW1_NURS_6053_WorkEnvironmentAssessmentTemplate
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
By Day 7 of Week 9
Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
6
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
Exit
·
Grid View
·
List View
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment |
45 (45%) – 50 (50%) An accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%) An accurate and completed Work Environment Assessment Template is provided. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%) A completed Work Environment Assessment Template that is vague or inaccurate is provided. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%) A vague and inaccurate Work Environment Assessment Template is provided, or is missing. |
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. |
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend in detail at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. |
16 (16%) – 19 (19%) The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
Total Points: 100 |
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
_1703268738.unknown
Work Environment Assessment
Template
Use this document to complete the Module 4
Workplace Environment Assessment
.
Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory |
Identify two things that surprised you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. |
What do the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace? |
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. |
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples. |
General Notes/Comments |
Work Environment Assessment
Template
© 2018 Laureate Education Inc.
1