CriticalThinkingDiscussionResponse1 x
Running Head: CRITICAL THINKING DISCUSSION RESPONSE 1
CRITICAL THINKING DISCUSSION RESPONSE 2
Critical Thinking Discussion Response
Student name
Professor
Course
Date of submission
Terrance response
Question 1
As outlined in the post, the process of critical thinking has a wide range of concept that is developed in a systematic process and transparency disciplinary aspect. It entails examinations of various methods, structures, and elements for the separates and breaks adown material and component in a diverse way for better understanding. It provides a roadmap that gives a mass factor that separates facts and interference. I must agree that the processes examining and conceptual use of a professional overview which gives alternatives and perceptive that supports view and handles explicit changes and challenges. That may act as a hindrance to attaining the foresee objective of s businesses and corporate organizations.
Question 2
Critical think has a wide range of applications; as depicted in the post, it has been applauded in flattening the curve of drugs and trafficking activities. Lopes, the scholar have given more weight on combating this criminal activity. Thorough critical thinking process a more insight on questioning and typical analyzing has a description of his independent ability, which eliminates receptive assumption. This has yielded a more effective result as he gives and proposes mitigation factors of reducing drug uncertainty.
Question 3
The case that was posted on the site did not consider fundamental factors that are necessary when making a public opinion upload. The rate of its endorsement does not meet the threshold. The strict policy should have flowed when uploading materials to avoid posing a detrimental implicating and moral erosion to the users,
Brittany response
Question 1
I agree with the post by the virtue that various processes are involved in the active critical thinking process. They include exhibiting knowledge’s comprehension of the matter at hand and, in the broader scope, examine evidence to enable attaining high profiled feedback. As indicated, before drawing in conclusion, it’s always necessary to consider the relevance of the matter.
Question 2
Emerge of advanced technology, innovating, and emerging trends AI has turned to be a reliable tool for passing meaningful communication. Through the use of critical thinking and professional evaluations, it has been able to attain its goal of clearing all the uncertainty and incorporating effective sharing of communications. We share the same though in agreeing that capturing the audience and eliminating Biasness requires a well-thought plan, which is supported by facts.
Question 3
As the case has been explained, I agree with my colleague that any discussion should depict fact through proving but not making incitement. The author should maintain his conversation through a clear and consistent description. If one chooses to address both positive and negative implications, the post should balance and not concluding the reader.
References
Battersby, M., & Bailin, S. (2018). Inquiry: A new paradigm for critical thinking. University of Windsor.
Edberg, H. (2018). Concluding discussion about Discoursal identity and learning critical thinking through creative writing. Creative Writing for Critical Thinking, 319-358. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65491-1_9
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
