197206f008000075ed070a4f79f87023a6b69cc5 xEXSUMRubric EXSUMExample-OperationAnacondaExplained x57107fd69d2800eab49baebc99ab363aa48728fb IMG_5325
The EXSUM has to be adapted to one of the NCO Core competencies. In my case will be operations
UNCLASSIFIED
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES20-008-1
11 June 2019
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS TO THE NCO COMMON CORE COMPENTENCY (NCOCCC) OF OPERATIONS?
(U) The NCOCCC of Operations is a combination of operational skill sets that, when mastered by senior leaders can save lives and ensure effective unified action. Some of its key tenets include: Large-scale combat operations; understanding operational and mission variables; resolving complex, ill-structured problems with the use of Mission Command; and understanding how to integrate the different branches of the military into successful joint operations (Department of the Army [DA], 2020, pp. 2-3). This final principle of conducting joint operations becomes increasingly important as contemporary conflicts continue to venture further into the realm of multi-domain warfare. (Marr, 2018, pp. 10-11). In order to execute such a complex task, Joint Force Commanders (JFC) must “integrate, synchronize, and direct joint operations” through the use of seven Joint Functions (Joint Chiefs of Staff [JCS], 2017, p. III-1). One of these functions, Command and Control, is how the JFC directs the forces toward accomplishment of the mission, and its essential task is to “Communicate and ensure the flow of information across the staff and joint force” (JCS, 2017, p. III-2). This task is critical to the creation of a shared understanding, which allows the separate branches to work seamlessly together toward a common goal. The absence of this unifying component hinders missions and increases casualties. In Operation ANACONDA, JFC Major General (MG) Hagenbeck failed to create such a shared understanding with his subordinate Air Force assets, which contributed to increasing the amount of casualties his forces incurred. Although the warning order was published on 6 January, MG Hagenbeck did not notify the Combined Force Air Component Commander of Operation ANACONDA until 23 February, just days before the operation began (Fleri et al., 2003). This failure to ensure the flow of information across the joint force, caused downstream effects in planning and preparation that led to diminished air support during the initial stages of the operation. As noted by Lambeth (2005) in his comprehensive analysis, “because so little air support had been requested…coalition troops entered the fight virtually unprotected by any preparatory and suppressive fire” (pp. 204-205). Operation Anaconda provides a clear case of how proficiency in the realm of Operations can result in fewer U.S. casualties.
Kenneth P. Mullan/MLC 20-008
kenneth.p.mullan.mil@mail.mil
APPROVED BY: MSG Brian Brown
References
Fleri, E., Howard, E., Hulkill, J., & Searle, T. R. (2003). Operation Anaconda case study. College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education.
Headquarters, Department of the Army. (2020). The Noncommissioned Officer Guide (TC 7-22.7).
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). Joint Operations (JP 3-0).
https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_0ch1 ?ver=2018-11-27-160457-910
Lambeth, B.S. (2005). Air power against terror: America’s conduct of Operation Enduring Freedom.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg166centaf.13?seq=1
Marr, S. (2018). Stability in Multi-Domain Battle. U.S. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute.
UNCLASSIFIED
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 1/3
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 2/3
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 3/3
Describe: Describe the overall concept of the NCOCCC.
Explain: Explain the parts and pieces of the NCOCCC. Give extra attention to the one you will highlight from the case study.
Transition statement: Transition from the NCOCCC description to the case study.
Example: Give BRIEF synopsis of the case study events with a STRONG tie back to the NCOCCC pieces.
Summary and Answer: Summarize everything already said and use summary to explicitly answer question.
EXSUMs follow the format outlined in TRADOC Regulation 1-11 with the following exceptions. Summary paragraph not to exceed 2 pages. Do NOT use footnotes.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES20-008-1 11 June 2019
(U) WHAT INSIGHTS ARE DERIVED FROM OPERATION ANACONDA IN REGARDS TO THE NCO COMMON CORE COMPENTENCY (NCOCCC) OF OPERATIONS?
(U) The NCOCCC of Operations is a combination of operational skill sets that, when mastered by senior leaders can save lives and ensure effective unified action. Some of its key tenets include: Large-scale combat operations; understanding operational and mission variables; resolving complex, ill-structured problems with the use of Mission Command; and understanding how to integrate the different branches of the military into successful joint operations (Department of the Army [DA], 2020, pp. 2-3). This final principle of conducting joint operations becomes increasingly important as contemporary conflicts continue to venture further into the realm of multi-domain warfare. (Marr, 2018, pp. 10-11). In order to execute such a complex task, Joint Force Commanders (JFC) must “integrate, synchronize, and direct joint operations” through the use of seven Joint Functions (Joint Chiefs of Staff [JCS], 2017, p. III-1). One of these functions, Command and Control, is how the JFC directs the forces toward accomplishment of the mission, and its essential task is to “Communicate and ensure the flow of information across the staff and joint force” (JCS, 2017, p. III-2). This task is critical to the creation of a shared understanding, which allows the separate branches to work seamlessly together toward a common goal. The absence of this unifying component hinders missions and increases casualties. In Operation ANACONDA, JFC Major General (MG) Hagenbeck failed to create such a shared understanding with his subordinate Air Force assets, which contributed to increasing the amount of casualties his forces incurred. Although the warning order was published on 6 January, MG Hagenbeck did not notify the Combined Force Air Component Commander of Operation ANACONDA until 23 February, just days before the operation began (Fleri et al., 2003). This failure to ensure the flow of information across the joint force, caused downstream effects in planning and preparation that led to diminished air support during the initial stages of the operation. As noted by Lambeth (2005) in his comprehensive analysis, “because so little air support had been requested…coalition troops entered the fight virtually unprotected by any preparatory and suppressive fire” (pp. 204-205). Operation Anaconda provides a clear case of how proficiency in the realm of Operations can result in fewer U.S. casualties.
Kenneth P. Mullan/MLC 20-008
kenneth.p.mullan.mil@mail.mil
APPROVED BY: MSG Brian Brown
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
References
: References keep single space but formatted and cited in APA for practice. No need to bold heading, EXSUMs do not use bold.
References
Fleri, E., Howard, E., Hulkill, J., & Searle, T. R. (2003). Operation Anaconda case study. College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education.
Headquarters, Department of the Army. (2020). The Noncommissioned Officer Guide
(TC 7-22.7).
Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). Joint Operations (JP 3-0).
https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_0ch1 ?ver=201
8
-11-27-160457-910
Lambeth, B.S. (2005). Air power against terror: America’s conduct of Operation Enduring Freedom.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg166centaf.13?seq=1
Marr, S. (2018). Stability in Multi-Domain Battle. U.S. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute.
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 1/3
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 2/3
11/19/2020 MLC Template FY2020
https://usasma.ncoes.army.mil/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_258288_1&course_id=_2637_1 3/3