attachment_22 attachment_28 x
I’m working on a english writing question and need support to help me study.
This online quiz has several questions. Each need to be answered in four to eight complete, college-level sentences. Explain fully and clearly. Show what you know. Any exact quotes (exact words) from the article should be in “quotation marks” and should not be overused. Quotes are only to support your answer, not replace it.
NON-FICTION ARTICLE FOR THIS WEEK: “WHY DO WE HATE LOVE?”
This non-fiction article with a strange title is our non-fiction article for the week. The language is fairly direct and the author makes an interesting case. As you read, ask yourself, “Do I agree with the author? Why or why not?”
first of all you have to read the paragraph after that you have to ANSWER the 4 questions
find attached the article and the 4 questions each question at least 100 words
Sender notified by
Mailtrack
16/04/21, 06:42:08
The Governor and the Legislators
Like any other state, North Carolina has regulatory institutions to safeguard the interests of citizens, the environment and the industries that bring revenue and jobs into the state. The North Carolina State legislature enacts the laws and the state government headed by the Governor, implements them.
North Carolina has a huge hog industry which provides significant employment in the state. That industry has however been facing several challenges in the last few years as appears from the media and other publications. The state needs the investment and wants to maintain its current industry going as well as it can and that includes the hog industry.
To increase production and reduce costs, hog production has been changing over the years. Producers have moved away from free run or pasture farming, which required large spaces and could only carry limited numbers of hogs. Production is now predominantly in hog barns; buildings that can house higher numbers and reduce labour as the barns are highly mechanised. The increased production brought processors into North Carolina because with the higher numbers, it became more profitable to bring the processing plants nearer to the producers. That brought jobs into the state and for a short while you were all relatively happy.
Unfortunately the higher production brought unwelcome side effects. Environmentalists and animal rights activists descended on your state, ganging up with residents and academics and pointing to the detriment to the environment and animals. The effluent from hog barns is smelly and too high in nitrogen and so it is leaching the soil and fouling up the water. The effluent ponds smell like hell and affected residents are now up in arms. The residents organized themselves into groups and campaigned for the state to take responsibility and buy them out so they can relocate. They even dumped a hog bomb at the governor’s office and to be honest, the smell is terrible. However, the state does not have enough money to buy out the residents. To make matters worse, the flooding from Hurricane Matthew was catastrophic, with ponds bursting their banks and even hogs getting drowned.
In an effort to respond to the residents’ concerns and keep the industry going, the last administration implemented legislation to stop any new hog barns, but the problem just will not go away. Because of the moratorium on any further developments of hog barns, the industry has been moving into consolidation of existing hog barns under pretty much one corporation, Smithfield, which maximizes the scales by having control of almost all the hog barns. Other corporate players have a smaller stake and they include Tyson.
The residents, environmental and animal rights activists were totally unsatisfied with the moratorium and some residents filed law suits asking for closure of some of the hog barns and claiming compensation from Smithfield and Tyson for damage to their quality of life. The residents were assisted by the environmentalists, but it’s a free country and you cannot do anything legally about that. Besides, it was part of that anger that led to the last governor (a Republican) losing in the 2016 elections and a new governor (a Democrat) being voted into office. The North Carolina legislature remains majority Republican however.
The state cannot afford either the demands from the residents or those of the environmentalists who want to effectively cut hog barns by 50%. That is patently unreasonable but in a democracy, populism can do strange things. The governor wants to find a compromise solution, i.e. act on the environment without killing the industry but also responding to residents. The majority of legislators are pro-industry and have enacted legislation limiting the amount claimable as damages from hog producing corporations and they had to override the governor’s veto to do that. However, the Republican majority legislators are also worried that the combination of activists and residents might swing the vote against them resulting in losing their seats and control at the next election. Already, they have lost the governor’s mansion and they now have to work with a Democrat!
The governor’s imperative for a negotiated settlement is to bring this long running conflict to an acceptable conclusion. Emotions are high and each group seems to be going for the jugular. To avoid that, the governor has persuaded legislators from both sides of the aisle (Democrats and Republicans) to participate in negotiations that you hope will head off a court ruling which is after all, an all or nothing option.
Your leverage with residents is jobs. Leverage with industry is that they can indeed end up getting shut down. Legislators’ concern is votes and very angry residents/voters are not a good base.
At RI you will have some preparation time in the morning to develop a consensual negotiation platform before engaging with the residents, producers and environmentalists. Use the time well. It would be best for state governance if the governor and the legislators can work out a united front and/or form alliances with other parties before the negotiation meeting. Preparation is critical to achieving your goals. Remember the environmentalists are a confrontational crowd so preparation is critical. Your team comprises of the governor and an assistant to help manage the negotiations, one Republican legislator and one Democrat.
Why Do We Hate Love?
Why Do We Hate Love?
By Robert Firestone, Ph.D.
Love—kindness, affection, sensitive attunement, respect, companionship—is not only difficult to find, but is even more challenging for many people to accept and tolerate. In my work with individuals and couples, I have observed countless examples of people reacting angrily when loving responses were directed toward them.
· One man felt a flash of anger at his wife when she said she was worried about him riding his bike in an unsafe neighborhood. Even though he knew she was not being controlling or judgmental, and despite being aware that her apprehension was based on the fact that she really loved and valued him, he felt rage.
· A woman became outright nasty when her boyfriend told her that he loved her so much he wished that they could have children together. She had never expressed hostility toward him before, and the man involved was not pressuring her or even suggesting a course of action. He said it was just a sweet feeling.
· In a therapy session, a usually calm and quiet man revealed that he felt fury when people praised him.
Unlike these individuals, many people are unaware that being loved or especially valued makes them feel angry and withholding. Indeed, this paradoxical reaction is largely an unconscious process. Even a simple compliment, although initially accepted at face value and enjoyed, can later arouse feelings of disbelief or anger toward the person giving the compliment, or can trigger negative attitudes and critical feelings towards oneself.
But why do love, positive acknowledgment and compliments arouse such animosity? There are a number of primary causes of this phenomenon discussed in this essay.
1. Being loved arouses anxiety, because it threatens long-standing psychological defenses formed early in life in relation to emotional pain and rejection, therefore leaving a person feeling more vulnerable.
Although the experience of being chosen and especially valued is exciting and can bring happiness and fulfillment, at the same time, it can be frightening and the fear often translates into anger and hostility. Basically, love is scary when it contrasts with childhood trauma. In that situation, the beloved feels compelled to act in ways that hurt the lover: behaving in a punitive manner, distancing themselves and pushing love away. In essence, people maintain the defensive posture that they formed early in life. Because the negative reaction to positive events occurs without conscious awareness, individuals respond without understanding what caused them to react. They rationalize the situation by finding fault with or blaming others, particularly those closest to them.
2. Being loved arouses sadness and painful feelings from the past.
Being treated with love and tenderness arouses a kind of poignant sadness that many people struggle to block out. Ironically, close moments with a partner can activate memories of painful childhood experiences, fears of abandonment and feelings of loneliness from the past. People are afraid of being hurt in the same ways they were hurt as children.
3. Being loved provokes a painful identity crisis.
When people have been hurt, they feel that if they accepted love into their life, the whole world as they have experienced it would be shattered, and they would not know who they were. Being valued or seen in a positive light is confusing, because it conflicts with the negative self-concept that many people form within their family.
In the developmental process, children idealize their parents at their own expense as part of a psychological survival mechanism. This idealization process is inextricably tied to maintaining an image of oneself as bad or deficient. However painful it may be, people are somehow willing to accept failure or rejection, because these are harmonious with the incorporated negative view of themselves, whereas the intrusion of being loved or having positive responses directed toward them is disruptive of their psychological equilibrium.
4
. Accepting being loved in reality disconnects people from a fantasy bond with their parents.
Early in life, children develop fantasies of being fused with a parent or primary caregiver to compensate for what is emotionally missing in their environment. The imagined connection offers a sense of safety, partially gratifies the child’s needs and relieves painful feelings of emotional deprivation and rejection. This fantasy persists into adult life, although it may be largely unconscious. As a result, the hurt individual maintains a sense of pseudo-independence, an attitude that they can take care of themselves without a need for others.
As a result of merging with their parents in their imagination, people continue to both nurture and punish themselves in the same way they were treated by their parents. In addition, as love relationships become more meaningful, deep and threatening, people tend to revert to utilizing the same defense mechanisms that their parents used to avoid pain. Reacting in a manner similar to their parents offers a sense of safety, regardless of any negative consequences. Once the fantasy bond takes hold, people are extremely reluctant to take a chance again on real love and gratification from a romantic partner.
5. Positive acknowledgment arouses guilt in relation to surpassing the parent of the same sex.
Achieving success in one’s love life or career can make a person aware of their parents’ weaknesses, limitations and failures to find gratification in their lives, in particular the parent of the same sex. Being chosen or preferred by a loved one in a relationship, or being acknowledged for a success for which others are striving in the workplace, tends to precipitate guilt reactions and self-recriminations. When the guilt of surpassing one’s parent or associate is operant, people fear retaliation and tend to limit or go against their own development.
Furthermore, people often feel angry at being acknowledged and, because the feeling appears to be irrational, it is suppressed. They distort the very people who made them feel loved or who supported or acknowledged their success or achievement, and act out aggression towards them. Many mistakenly perceive positive acclaim as an expectation or a demand to continue the behavior that earned them the appreciation and praise. All of these painful emotions are relieved to some extent as people withhold their positive or lovable qualities, adjust their performance downward and unconsciously attempt to diminish or sabotage their success. It is extremely difficult to get out of that kind of withholding pattern.
6. Accepting being loved stirs up painful existential issues.
In a previous work, Fear of Intimacy, I wrote, “Being close to another in a loving relationship makes one aware that life is precious, but must eventually be surrendered. If we embrace life and love, we must also face death’s inevitability.” In particular, the experience of being loved makes one place more value on one’s life, and the anticipation of its ending becomes tortuous. For this reason, people attempt to modify those loving exchanges rather than go through the painful feelings. Often close moments in a relationship are followed by attempts on the part of one or both partners to take the edge off the experience or to withdraw to a “safer” distance. Many people have spoken of heightened feelings of death anxiety after feeling especially close emotionally and sexually, and of later reacting with anger and withholding behaviors that lead to deterioration in the relationship.
For the most part, people create the emotional world in which they live. In actuality, they attempt to recreate the world they lived in as children to maintain psychological equilibrium. Positive events and circumstances, particularly the experience of being loved, seriously interrupt this process. In order to maintain a false sense of safety and security, people utilize the defense mechanisms of selection, distortion and provocation in their relationships. They tend to select partners who are like people in their early lives, because they are more comfortable with people who fit their defenses. Secondly, they distort their partners and see them as more like the people in their past than they really are. Thirdly, they try to provoke responses in their partners that duplicate interactions from their past. The end result is antithetical to maintaining happy and satisfying relationships.
Lastly, most people are not aware of their negative reactions to being loved or the dynamics described above, nor do they recognize their own withholding behavior and its effect on themselves and their loved ones. The hope is that becoming aware of these core defenses and challenging them can help people to be liberated from these detrimental effects.
4
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
